SUN EDITORIAL:
Transform the FDA
Experts agree that the agency desperately needs new leadership and resources
Fri, Nov 28, 2008 (2:05 a.m.)
Four years ago skeptical eyes were turned toward the Food and Drug Administration after the arthritis drug Vioxx was voluntarily recalled by its manufacturer, Merck & Co. Tests by Merck showed that people taking the drug were far more susceptible to having heart attacks than the general population.
The FDA was heavily criticized for not conducting follow-up research after approving drugs like Vioxx, which was linked to thousands of deaths during its five years on the market.
Criticism of this agency, which is vital to public health, has only risen since the Vioxx debacle. In a story Wednesday, The Washington Post reported that government studies, former officials of the FDA, members of Congress and watchdog groups have concluded the FDA needs new leadership, better technology, more professional staff and a bigger budget.
The newspaper quoted William K. Hubbard, who retired in 2005 after serving the previous 14 years as an FDA associate commissioner. “The FDA is hanging on by its fingertips in protecting us,” Hubbard said.
The FDA’s responsibility includes oversight over prescription drugs, medical devices, the nation’s blood supply and food. It has 11,000 employees and a $2.1 billion budget.
While that might sound sufficient, safeguarding food alone is almost overwhelming the agency. In today’s global economy, processed food contains ingredients produced in countries all over the world.
This includes China, where melamine, used to make plastics and fertilizer, has been intentionally introduced into the food chain. Producers there discovered that adding melamine masks the fact that food, whether for pets or for newborn children, has been watered down to increase profits.
Food tainted with high levels of melamine can cause kidney disease and has sickened and killed people and pets in many countries. Trace amounts of melamine have now turned up in baby formula sold in the U.S., although the FDA says the formula remains safe.
Nevertheless, much more vigilance than is now being seen from the FDA is required to keep Americans protected against tainted food and blood and unsafe medical devices.
We hope that Congress and President-elect Barack Obama transform the FDA so that it can again be trusted to fully accomplish its lifesaving mission.
Discussion: 2 comments so far…
Post a comment
Email Edition
- Most Read
- Discussed
- Most E-mailed
- Fourth fireworks light up valley sky
- Ensign’s pal lacked usual qualifications for job as senator’s senior aide
- Jay-Z lights up Las Vegas, lives life to the max
- Cousins attracting attention from college football recruiters
- Strip performer is eBay high bidder for Elvis ring
- Las Vegas to sizzle for the Fourth
- Swarm of crickets descends once again on Northern Nevada
- Local conservative radio talk reflects right’s downcast state
- Henderson house fire displaces family of three
- Day 2 of the World Series of Poker main event
Blogs
Elsewhere
Goalie chooses Mudbugs over Wranglers
The Bull's-Eye
Real drama follows Desert Classic victory by 'The Power' (UPDATED)
Elsewhere
Spike TV's 'UFC's Ultimate 100: Greatest Fights' airs tonight
The Kats Report
LV Phil 'Spectacular' at Springs Preserve was great -- for the music
Punchy Points: UFC 100
No. 6: The Ref: Dean relishes role, making right calls (1 Comment)
The Bull's-Eye
Canadian is first in Desert Classic's final four, Barney joins him (UPDATED) (2 Comments)
Sports: Upon Further Review
July 4 at Wimbledon
Calendar
- Blues Monday at the House of Blues (9 p.m. to 11 p.m.)
- Industry Night at XS (10 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.)
- The Automatic Tour at The Square Apple (5 p.m. to 9:30 p.m.)
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.
Technorati
While I agree that the FDA needs to be transformed, don't go hog-wild in praise for it. The FDA's primary shortcoming is that it protects the financial interests of big pharma at the expense of the health of the citizens. The FDA has been succesfully sued by several physicians for suppressing first amendment rights and threatening researchers who discover new uses for inexpensive drugs and supplements that could lower healthcare costs.
Didn't we read this same article like a week ago?
Brian do you just recycle one "raise tax" or "increase regulation" article each week?
I mean, come on, how many times do I have to repeat the problems with the FDA?