Las Vegas Sun

November 25, 2009

Currently: 60° | Complete forecast | Log in

Agreement reached on budget shortfall

Published Tuesday, Nov. 25, 2008 | 5:39 p.m.

Updated Tuesday, Nov. 25, 2008 | 6:53 p.m.

CARSON CITY – Gov. Jim Gibbons says a “broad based agreement” has been reached with top legislators to borrow up to $150 million and make further cuts in government, possibly up to 100 employees, to address the $340 million state budget deficit this year.

After a two hour meeting with legislative leaders, Gibbons said he would convene a special session of the Legislature Dec. 8-9 to approve the plan. And he says this should get the state through this fiscal year without new or increased taxes.

Assembly Speaker Barbara Buckley, D-Las Vegas, said there’s a “framework” agreed upon and now “We have to make sure it’s balanced.”

Buckley said there were recommendations that the state issue bonds to get it through its financial troubles. But that was rejected.

The agreement, which was suggested by State Treasurer Kate Marshall, would have the state use a “line of credit” up to $150 million to get through this fiscal year. This money is in the state’s Local Government Investment fund where cities and counties put their cash to invest.

Buckley said the tentative agreement will permit the state to survive this fiscal year and give the 2009 Legislature a chance to work out long term solutions. Gibbons agreed this was only a short term solution.

Gibbons said he hopes the state can avoid new taxes in the next biennium. And there may have to be consolidation of agencies.

The lawmakers and the governor are waiting for the projection of the five-member Economic Forum that meets Monday and decides how much the state will collect in taxes for the rest of this fiscal year and for the next two years.

The governor and Legislature must abide by the Forum’s projections, unless they raise taxes.

Assemblywoman Sheila Leslie, D-Reno, said the decision reached Tuesday “postpones the inevitable” and the 2009 Legislature will have to come up with a “comprehensive solution.”

Leslie said lawmakers rejected some suggestions from the Gibbons Administration. For instance, she said the legislators would not approve closing Summit View, the juvenile detention facility in Las Vegas.

She said “This still leaves a big (money) gap we will have to wrestle with.”

Under the plan, the state would use a line of credit and borrow from the local government investment pool at an interest rate of 2.5 percent. The money would have to be repaid in five years. The governor said the state could draw down the money as it is needed.

Gibbons said the treasurer’s office feels this is legal. But he said he wants his legal staff to look at it.

The top lawmakers will meet next Monday after the Economic Forum makes its predictions to see how much they will definitely need to get through this fiscal year.

Buckley said Gibbons will be in Philadelphia for a meeting of governors. And if there are any hitches, another meeting will be called for Wednesday.

Gibbons said every account in government with extra money will be swept clean. So state agencies won’t be returning any unspent money to the general fund at the end of this fiscal year.

He said state agencies will be trimmed further but less than 100 employees would be laid off.

The governor conceded this was a short term fix. For one part of a long-term solution, Gibbons suggests that state workers forfeit part of their salaries. That’s better than layoffs, he said.

Each 1 percent cost of living raise paid employees costs the state $32 million. He said if they gave up one-half of a percent, the state would realize $16 million. An employees union has rejected this suggestion.

There was also discussion, he said about cutting back the 120 day regular session. That costs $20 million. And reducing it to 90 days would save some money.

When asked if he requested the lawmakers to take a cut in salary, Gibbons just laughed. They earn $7,800 for the full 120 days.

Marshall said she has discussed with her legal staff the state taking the “line of credit” with the investment pool. The local governments would still be earning the same 2.5 percent interest as now plus an additional quarter percent.

Marshall says the line of credit allows the borrower to determine at a later date if money is actually needed and only ask for the amount required at that time. She said if the state issued bonds, the interest rate starts immediately at a much higher rate and the state might be asking for more money than is necessary to cure the shortfall.

The portfolio of the local government investment poor has a par value of $768.8 million.

Gibbons said these steps were “not pretty or easy” but they must be taken to balance the budgets.

Discussion: 3 comments so far…

  1. 1. We are borrowing money to pay for government operations. That sounds stupid. That is like using your credit card to buy food and not pay off the credit card bill at the end of the month.

    2. Gibbons, Democratic State Senate Leader and Buckley - Democratic State Assembly Leader- all agreed on more cuts. So the Democrats and Republicans are pushing for spending cuts.

    3. Unions said they prefer layoffs to any reduction in salaries increases.

  2. If State employees received a cost of living allowance (COLA) this year, I don't know anybody who is aware of it. Indeed, we were told that we would be receiving a 4% COLA in June, 2008. In approximately early June we were told there would be no COLA after all.

    We have been told that our monthly health insurance payments are going to be raised;
    we were then told that our health insurance coverage will be reduced;
    we are now being told to expect a decrease in pay.

    Effectively:

    Our cost of living increase was removed shortly before we were told our cost of living is going to be raised (due to health insurance rate increase) while our health insurance coverage is going to be reduced (literally paying more to get less) and our pay will be decreased (so the State can pay less to get more).

    It's funny how the government can righteously defend that which it would fine ordinary citizens.

    It's good to be the king I guess.

    Don't worry about the kids being educated in one of the most poorly funded education systems in America, just cut more funding from education and all will be fine. Forget the supposed 'need' for public safety, let law enforcement work for less. 'Morale'? Hmmm... not really necessary. State employees will do the job, for less, and LIKE it! Nevermind contracts or binding obligations, if the Governor does it, it must be legal (and morally appropriate).

    Hey, I know: let's tax the casinos more! Nevermind that tough times for them will mean even tougher times for us... let's just become MORE dependent upon their revenue streams. THAT should fix everything! There must be blood in that turnip!

  3. My husband, who is NOT a state employee or any type of government employee for that matter has not had a raise, cost of living or otherwise (such as a merit raise) for 5 years now - meanwhile his health insurance premium also has gone up while the coverage has decreased, our utilities have gone up, our food cost has gone up, etc etc etc - and this situation has become the norm for many many people, we certainly are not unique in our situation - if State workers previously (up until now that is) were accustomed to received Cost of Living raises then consider yourselves lucky when you got them and now welcome to the rest of the world.

Post a comment

Commenting requires registration.

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Full comments policy.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

OR Create an account (It's free)

  • Most Read
  • Discussed
  • Most E-mailed

Calendar »

  • 25 Wed
  • 26 Thu
  • 27 Fri
  • 28 Sat
  • 29 Sun