Facebook
Fark
Digg
Reddit
StumbleSUN EDITORIAL:
Gender-biased premiums
Study finds women, on average, pay more than men for health insurance on the open market
Monday, Nov. 10, 2008 | 2:07 a.m.
When women who are not covered by an employer’s health insurance plan seek to buy coverage directly from an insurer, they are normally charged much higher premiums than men, particularly if they are younger than 55, according to a national study.
The nonprofit National Women’s Law Center in Washington found that to be the case in 38 states, including Nevada. Those states allow the insurers to charge different rates based on the customer’s sex, a practice known as gender rating.
The law center’s study, released in September, focused on the cost of health plans offered to 25-, 40- and 55-year-old men and women on the open market in capital cities throughout the United States.
Among the findings was that a 40-year-old woman living in Carson City pays on average 11 to 39 percent more than a 40-year-old man for the same best-selling plans available.
Insurance industry representatives were quoted in the study as saying women pay higher premiums because they typically have higher costs for hospital stays, physicians’ visits and other medical care. But the law center made a valid counterargument by stating that many women have lower health expenses than men of the same age.
“Individual insurance providers should not charge a higher premium based on a generalization about women as a class that is not necessarily applicable to the individual woman being insured,” the report stated.
It is both unfair and discriminatory to charge a woman more than a man for insurance when their health is relatively the same. Ten states have come to that conclusion and two others have limited the use of gender rating, but Nevada is not one of them.
This would be a worthy issue for the Nevada Legislature to explore during its 2009 session. Insurers should be made to explain to lawmakers why a woman, who may incur lower health care expenses than a man of the same age, can wind up with higher premiums. There has to be a fairer solution than what is now allowed under state law.
Discussion: comments so far…
Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.
Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.
No trusted comments have been posted.
Post a comment
Most Popular
- Viewed
- Discussed
- E-mailed
- Is Kate Upton the next Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Edition cover model?
- Man saves ‘60s Vegas party house, fills it with treasures
- Man kicked by officer says he still respects law enforcement
- Contraception a clear policy matter
- UNLV basketball in middle of big week of preparations for San Diego State game
- Is Grammy Award-nominated Skrillex worth the hype?
- Beyond the Rack to open distribution facility this month
- Big banks near mortgage deal with state AGs
- Las Vegas traffic stop leads to ‘Suge’ Knight’s arrest
- Sun’s Demirjian earns national award for congressional coverage
Blogs
Elsewhere
Revel reveals smoke-free casino opening
Cirque du Soleil show in Sands China casino to close this month
Meet the woman behind Sheldon Adelson
The Kats Report
A sophisticated look at line-moving and dog-show handicapping from Wynn's Johnny Avello
Elsewhere
Update 2: Caesars IPO pricing delayed due to "glitch" - underwriter
The Kats Report
A party replete with Carrot Top, 'AGT' contestants, a couple of Blue Men, deep-fried Oreos ... oh, and the Super Bowl (2 Comments)
High School Sports Scene
High School Hoops Picks: Week 7 (1 Comment)
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.
Here is the explanation:
Women get pregnant. Men don't.
Disallowing price discrimination means the price for men goes up.
That means we will have more men go uninsured.
If you want the price of pregnancy to go down, get rid of 3rd party payer systems and move toward Health Savings Accounts.
Doctors like to tack on all sorts of unnecessary procedures for pregnant women just to drive the bill up. Women don't care so it goes to the insurance company to pay. Insurance company must charge women more.
By the way, is that Women's center going to complain about men paying higher car insurance or is their deafening science from their quarters?
Wall St crashed and burned, and only then did the American public change party leadership. After Wall St., everybody was pointing fingers. But it's been coming since Reagan
The health care system is on track for a crash, too - big time. Every time I go to a doctor he/she wants to prescribe pills and order some sort of procedure. I avoid them. Baby boomers are aging and retiring. The health care system is going to collapse.
The American people need to wake up, stay involved, and start pushing for this system to be reined in. And stop going along with all the bull$#!+ procedures your doctors order.
By the way, employer avoidance of health care has everything to do with the increasing costs due to these unnecessary procedures. And that's huge during childbirth. What's a woman in labor going to do when she's told some procedure is "recommended"?
Doctors need to be rated and sanctioned somehow for ordering unnecessary procedures - within reason, of course.
At least we can hope that the FDA will now stop being an arm of the pharmaceutical/health care industry.
The problem with the answer "women get pregnant, men don't" bullcrap is that men get women pregnant. Health insurance covers Viagra and many don't cover birth control.
Down with such hypocrisy!
Health Savings Accounts will do just that G4OBama.
By eliminating the middleman, people will be interested in knowing what procedures cost, why they are necessary and will decide what they are willing to pay for.
That will even eliminate the hospitals ability to charge for circumcisions on girls.
Another issue is that men tend to have a lot more of the problems that strike older people, ie heart attacks and strokes. Additionally it has been well documented that men tend to get into more accidents due to being men. They get more construction accidents, they get into more fights, and in general do a lot of the dumb stuff (any one seen a female on Jackass lately?). On the issue of women getting pregnant, what about sterile women, or women over 40 who probably won't have kids. Your argument KDR is pretty weak.
Also as for men having higher insurance than women for driving... Men have overall a tendency to be far more aggressive on the road. Hence the higher premiums, because men under 30 tend to do more bone-headed things on the road.
Redferret,
Economists have shown that even single unmarried women or women who don't plan on having kids suffer from the stigma of potentially getting pregnant and will pay accordingly. For salaries that means an extra 2% less for health insurance that means 4% more.
As far as me, I drive a vehicle that is slow, it doesn't want to go fast, yet I have to pay a premium that reflects the stupid nature of unmarried male drivers with no kids roughly my age.
Its called actuarial science. Its not a weak argument, in fact, that Women's Law Center admits it. Their caveat is that giving birth to babies creates a societal benefit so women should be subsidized (which is nonsense).
Actually I just realized a point that totally undoes your argument, in Nevada and other states insurance companies don't pay for pregnancies because they are considered a pre-existing condition. Since in Nevada insurance companies don't pony up for all the necessary treatments, people have to do it on their own. So why are women penalized?