Sun editorial:
Ending credit deception?
Federal Reserve’s proposal to tighten rules on lenders is long overdue
Fri, May 9, 2008 (2:06 a.m.)
The Federal Reserve has proposed new rules for the credit card industry to protect consumers by prohibiting practices the agency considers unfair.
One of the proposed rules would restrict lenders from taking a consumer’s payments and applying them to debts that have lower interest rates before putting them toward balances with higher interest rates. Banks do this to collect more interest, but Federal Reserve officials say it unfairly keeps consumers deeper in debt.
The Fed also wants to do away with a practice known as “double-cycle billing,” which preys on consumers who pay some, but not all, of their credit card balances every month. For example, if a consumer owes $500 on a credit card and makes a $400 payment, his next bill will charge interest based on the entire $500 that was owed on the previous month’s statement, rather than the unpaid balance of $100.
The new rules also would prohibit lenders from charging security deposits and fees when credit is made available and would require lenders to provide customers with “a reasonable amount of time” to make payments.
In advertising lines of credit that have multiple interest rates, banks would have to include the factors that determine whether a consumer qualifies for the lowest interest rate and the highest credit limit.
The Fed’s proposal, announced Friday, will remain open for public comment until mid-July. Congress is considering legislation that calls for similar measures, and some lawmakers offered guarded praise for the Fed’s actions. Banking industry officials oppose the proposed rules and have warned that such restrictions could lead to higher interest rates and credit that is tougher to obtain.
Such threats ring hollow, however. The Consumer Federation of America told the Associated Press that the average debt for more than half of American households that have revolving credit card balances is $17,000.
Certainly, people should pay off what they owe. But it is not fair to prevent consumers from paying off their cards through deceptive practices and ever-increasing fees.
Discussion: 2 comments so far…
Post a comment
- Most Read
- Discussed
- Editors’ Picks
- Democrats propose taxes to fund veterans’ benefits
- Fire destroys Boulder Highway casino (UPDATED)
- Goodman changes face on state’s top job
- Voters, pick your fix for gas prices
- Desai, colleagues may take the Fifth, stalling lawsuits for years
- Rogers giveth and taketh away, until he gets what he wants
- In anti-tax Nevada, policy can be pawned
- Sheldon Adelson questioned by Israeli police
- Reid to Lieberman: That’s a second demerit
- CityCenter pushes ahead, despite economy
Blogs
Elsewhere
Minor quake shakes northwest Reno
Movie on Binion's death to premiere in September
Politics: Ralston's Flash
Secretary of state challenges filing, creates first term limits case
Cops, Courts and Safety
Shots fired at Cheyenne High School (2 Comments)
Politics: The Early Line
Yucca license application expected in early June (1 Comment)
Face To Face: Final Take
Heck Returns Home (1 Comment)
Politics: The Early Line
Politico: Dems tying GOP candidates to unflattering portrayals of Adelson (2 Comments)
Politics: Ralston's Flash
AG backs up secretary of state on recall petitions
Calendar
- Third Thursdays Arts Walk (5 p.m.)
- The Bargain DJ Collective (9 p.m.)
- Louie Anderson (7 p.m.)
- The Improv at Harrah's (8:30 p.m.)
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.


This is the first common sense legislation I have seen in a long time. In addition, they should not be allowed to charge 32% interest.
That's guido rates.
I guess one role of government is to protect dumb people.
Most of the credit card industry is based on taking advantage of people that have poor financial skills.
Why carry a balance with a card that has 23% interest? Why carry a balance on any credit card?
Why are people continuely late with payments or get over limit fee or do not make min. payments?
That is because they are dumb people.
The result of the new regulations will be this.
Credit card companies will charge more somewhere else to make up for the loss revenue.
Or they will restrict who will get credit cards.
Which is good because that means less dumb people will giving their money away to the credit card companies.