Facebook
Fark
Digg
Reddit
StumbleLetter to the editor:
55-mph speed limit will save gas, money
Thursday, May 8, 2008 | 2:01 a.m.
The proposed “gas tax holiday” from two of our presidential candidates fails to meet or solve any of the problems associated with the $3.62 gas prices of today. The problem is national in scope; the proposals are a short-term fix and contribute to inflation and high food prices.
My solution addresses all of these problems and will produce a minimum 10 percent reduction in the consumption of gasoline and produce a reduction of consumption for as long as required. It will also result in an increased supply of gasoline that will bring down the prices we pay today.
Very simply, my solution is for Congress to declare that effective next week, the speed limit on all roads federal highways, state highways, county and city roads shall be 55 miles per hour. The penalty for violations of this law shall be $100 for the first offense, $500 for the second offense and $2,500 for all subsequent violations.
The total contribution is shared equally by all citizens, and all citizens will share in the benefits of this program. It is a simple solution, easy to implement and fair to all. It is time to stop the bickering and make it happen.
Discussion: comments so far…
Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.
Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.
No trusted comments have been posted.
Post a comment
Everything Under the Sun
Blogs
The Kats Report
Las Vegas Philharmonic says search for new music director to begin 'immediately' (1 Comment)
With Shenandoah project stalled, Wayne Newton hits back legally (7 Comments)
Where does a Playmate play when she turns 21? Vegas! (3 Comments)
Ice Ice Billy
The road to six-toed cats and Mayor Bubba
The Kats Report
David Itkin tells L.V. Philharmonic officials he's on his way out (14 Comments)
Diamond Dave sells it well as Van Halen pours out the power at MGM Grand (2 Comments)
Entering debut at Tryst, Nick Hissom is a model for a rapid rise to prominence (3 Comments)
- Locally owned and independent since 1950; Winner of the Pulitzer Prize for Public Service, best news website in the nation & DuPont Award for broadcast journalism
I agree, but I doubt it will happen. People seem more eager anymore to rip up Alaskan wilderness than to be personally inconvenienced.
Carter was voted out years ago. Get over it.
The premise "55-mph speed limit will save gas, money" is akin to someone using slogans to reincarnate the flat earth society. Simply stated, the 55 mph didn't save lives or fuel last time, why would it now? It surely won't solve our energy problems.
Those nations that are self sufficient in energy also have the strongest economies. What we’re suffering from is a delusional belief that we can solve our energy and environmental problems by devaluing the dollar and printing more money to ship offshore buy energy.
There is only one solution to our energy crisis. We must become self-sufficient! We need to green-light oil production in US territories, liquefied coal conversion, solar, alternative fuels, and more efficient vehicles and technologies. ALL! While we’re attaining energy self-sufficiency, we can simultaneously work to improve processes, cost, the environment and carbon footprints, too.
Changing the speed limit does not address the core problem. In fact, the rule of unintended consequences for this remedy has been studied, and is a known. It didn't work, nor can it! This proposal, when taken in context of all the factors, would have the opposite effect.
Most people act in a reasonable and responsible manner; whereas, government runs on revenue and empire building… not rational thought. The last NMSL created a monster US agency of Public Myth and Propaganda AKA NHTSA, along with a parasite legacy of law enforcement, courts etc that continues today. Clearly at the expense of safety and due process. Expanding this entitlement access to your wallet is not an energy policy.
To reduce fuel consumption you need to optimize and reduce flow friction. Slowing traffic in urban areas causes reductions in roadway capacity and service levels. In terms of carbon footprint, how much energy is consumed by the reduced capacity, stop and go traffic jams etc, if you could actually get traffic to slow?
On rural roads what is the real cost of the few gallons saved, if the trucker, business man, traveler et al now has to spend 5 days on the road to accomplish what he used to do in 4. Besides the lost productivity, what does it cost in energy to staff hotels, restaurants, and to get their staff to work or the supplies delivered.
Transportation infrastructure, energy use, the ability to live and pay for these systems, and to do it safely is a process, not a slogan.
We can improve commerce and our economy, save lives, reduce energy consumption and improve the environment when those in charge are interested in the best interest of "We the People". Therein lies the true problem.
Speed limits are a red herring. Per a conversation with my senator's (Harry Reid) transportation staff member… none of the groups that come to see him say this. Precisely, all levels of Washington DC is run by self interest, not "We the People"!
Chad Dornsife, Executive Director
Best Highway Safety Practices Institute
Mr. Dornsife,
Thanks for telling me what the people stand for. Now I won't have to chime in.
You speak for your group, not all of us, and I'm betting you're serving your own self-interest as well.
Our own self interest? Yes! We are a non profit demanding our laws be based solely on empirical findings that have been fully vetted. There are protocols to test new thesis, but in all cases once the finding are known, public policy should reflect the actual findings.
Our group is made up entirely by those who donate their time. We have no paid positions or advocates.
First, how do you know that your idea would save 10 percent of fuel?
Vegas has lots of stop and go driving and your idea would only apply to traffic on freeways.
Rural areas with speed limits of 50 would see NO savings using your half-baked idea.
There has to be a bit of compromise. Cutting speed limits worked in the last gas crisis, to a degree; it's not a quick-fix, but it is a real solution that no one is talking about. This undoubtedly would provide the most immediate results in reducing the cost of fuel.
However, we should also work on alternative fuel sources, new refineries, and new fuel sources. As much as I think people are self-interested, wasteful, and excessive - like cdornsife, for instance - I also realize that this greed drives capitalism, which is a proven tool for resolving problems like the one we're facing. Indeed, we already see companies responding to the energy crisis globally, with GM building plug-in versions of all its cars, and leading in fuel cell technology.
I know that nothing I'm saying is new or controversial. However, it MIGHT surprise you that I am a Republican voting for John McCain.
HelenWeils wrote:
"Carter was voted out years ago. Get over it."
It was President Nixon, not President Carter, who imposed the nationwide 55 mph speed limit (in 1974).