Letter to the Editor:
Mortgage bailout unfair to majority
Tuesday, May 6, 2008 | 2:03 a.m.
Congress is considering financial assistance for home mortgage holders, who, for one reason or another, have slipped into foreclosure. This assistance is intended only for primary residences and supposedly would not apply to investors holding more than one residential mortgage.
Nationally, 2.04 percent of residential mortgage loans are in foreclosure. The question is: Why should the U.S. government expend taxpayer dollars to bail out this small group while the remaining 97.96 percent of home mortgage holders (many of whom are barely surviving in difficult to impossible financial situations) keep faithfully paying on their loans? Why should they keep paying in addition to taking a tax “hit” for the nonpayers?
What’s to keep others from defaulting in order to get in line for the government payoff? Why not give money to all taxpayers holding mortgages of less than, say, $750,000 and “cram” everyone’s mortgage down to a more reasonable level?
The federal government is living on fiat money anyway, so there must be plenty to go around ... just print more, right?
Discussion: 2 comments so far…
Post a comment
- Most Read
- Discussed
- Most E-mailed
- Police: 3 arrested in officer’s death have gang ties
- Corrections officer with Metro killed in U.S. 95 crash
- System fails to catch contractor’s family tie with county
- Where to watch UFC 106
- Fontainebleau contractors say sales process is flawed
- UNLV and Southern Illinois will be guarded tonight
- SEC sues former gaming exec for alleged insider trading
- Station Casinos, lenders agree to rent decrease at 4 properties
- Findlay guard Joseph scores 33, talks about UNLV
- Bishop Gorman takes Sunset Region title in win over Cimarron
Blogs
The Kats Report
For props, Lewis Black needs only his manic delivery and torrid material (3 Comments)
Elsewhere
Sands China raises $2.5 billion in Hong Kong IPO (1 Comment)
Marquardt v. Sonnen scheduled for UFC 109
Bloggity, Bloggity, Bloggity
Will a fourth consecutive title by Jimmie Johnson be good or bad for NASCAR? (3 Comments)
Top Chef: Las Vegas
The Jet Stream: And then there were four
Top Chef Episode 12: On keeping it simple
Miech Again
Chilly start for Chace, but Stanback says he'll warm up (2 Comments)
- Live chat
- Tuesday, noon PST
- Chat with Krista Creelman
- Problem Gambling Center executive director Krista Creelman will answer questions about gambling addiction from Las Vegas Sun readers from noon to 1 p.m. Tuesday, Nov. ... Submit question
Calendar »
- 22 Sun
- 23 Mon
- 24 Tue
- 25 Wed
- 26 Thu
-
UFC 106 at Mandalay Bay Events Center
Mandalay Bay Events Center | 7 p.m. to 11 p.m.
-
Julio Iglesias at the Las Vegas Hilton
Las Vegas Hilton
-
Natasha Wicks hosts at Hawaiian Tropic Zone
Hawaiian Tropic Zone | 10 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.
-
Tito Ortiz hosts at Tao
Tao | 10 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.
-
Hiroshima at Santa Fe Station
Santa Fe Station
-
Frank Mir hosts at LAX
LAX Nightclub | 10 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.
-
The Four Tops at The Orleans Showroom
Orleans Hotel-Casino
-
Amir Sadollah hosts at Prive
Prive | 10 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.
Technorati










I concur, and I will take this one step further. I just went into Chpt. 13 bankruptcy because I overstepped my limits. I blame no one but myself. I take responsibility and will be paying back plenty. (Trust me, the new laws are pretty intense.) As for my house, well, I owe a lot more than it's worth right now. But instead of walking away, I will continue to do the right thing and pay on it. We should not be bailing people out. If they messed up, there are legal options available to them right now. They should bit the bullet the same as many of us who are copping to our bad behavior.
not me i will file chapter 7 at the end of year