Las Vegas Sun

July 24, 2008

SUN EDITORIAL:

All washed up

A desalination plant is not the immediate answer to Southern Nevada’s water needs

Tue, Mar 25, 2008 (2:06 a.m.)

Opponents of the Southern Nevada Water Authority’s plan to draw water from rural Nevada to supply Clark County — including Gov. Jim Gibbons — have pointed to desalination as the answer.

They say that instead of building a pipeline to pull water out of rural Nevada, a desalination plant could be built in California or Mexico. Nevada could swap the water the plant produces for a larger draw of water from Lake Mead.

Problem solved? Not exactly.

The situation is much more complex than the Water Authority’s opponents make it out to be.

As Phoebe Sweet reported in Friday’s Las Vegas Sun, the Water Authority has been pursuing desalination as part of a broader plan for the long term. But desalination is certainly not a short-term option, given the expense of building and operating a plant, not to mention the environmental issues associated with desalination.

For now, the cost of water produced by desalination is prohibitive. The process requires a tremendous amount of money, and environmentalists note that the demand for more electricity means more power plants, which come with their own set of costs and environmental issues.

Desalination plants also produce brine and disposing of that can be an environmental problem. Trying to build a plant in California would be a difficult — and expensive — task. In California, environmental issues receive considerable scrutiny, particularly by the powerful Coastal Commission, which holds a tight rein on development along the Pacific Ocean.

Desalination certainly is something the Water Authority should be pursuing, but building a desalination plant would not ease Southern Nevada’s reliance on Lake Mead. The current drought threatens to curtail extra water supplies Nevada might otherwise use. As the lake level continues to drop, it is clear the region needs other sources of water that can be tapped more quickly and realistically than desalination.

Discussion: 1 comment so far…

  1. Several news articles on seawater desalination reveal
    that desalination technology is little understood by
    most journalists, local water managers, politicians
    and environmental groups. In searching for
    renewable potable water or supplementing current
    sources few are aware that there is more than one
    desalination technology.

    When evaluating a desalination project Reverse Osmosis
    is typically the process considered. Yet, there is a
    viable and proven alternative in distillation. The
    Advanced Vapor Compression Desalination
    Process is an advanced and highly environmentally
    friendly desalination process, an alternative, single
    performance, and lower maintenance process compared to
    Reverse Osmosis. The system is based on proven
    flash distilling principles but features an innovative,
    highly efficient, and compact design. Additionally,
    it offers a unique advantage in the treatment of salt byproducts.
    The system produces outputs of either valuable crystalline
    Salt or concentrated brine. The process is optimized for
    the desalination of seawater drawn from wells below the
    sea floor and not returning the brine to the sea.

    The process has modular abilities and can be expanded
    to meet future requirements in water demand or
    designed and built at the start for higher volume. A
    basic plant design can operate on solar, thermal,
    nuclear or traditional energy sources. Each unit is
    optimized from an initial engineering site study to
    account for different environmental and structural
    needs. A basic stand-alone unit of 1 acre-foot per day
    has a footprint of approximately thirty feet in
    diameter. The larger the plant water volume the lower
    the cost is per acre-foot. The plant energy
    consumption is on the order of about 5 to 21 kw per
    1000 gallons produced based on the design, volume
    produced and type of energy.

    The system can also be used in industrial treatment
    and recovery of effluent water. The life cycle of the
    plant is based on a 25 year time line which can be
    extended through proper preventable maintenance and overhaul.

Post a comment

Commenting requires registration.

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Full comments policy.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

OR Create an account (It's free)

  • Most Read
  • Discussed
  • Editors’ Picks

Calendar

Craig Ferguson

Craig Ferguson

Comedy with a Scottish accent. (9 p.m. MGM Grand)