SUN EDITORIAL:
Let’s ensure precision
Potential problems with 2010 census should be addressed aggressively and now
Mon, Mar 10, 2008 (2:05 a.m.)
Government auditors told Congress last week that the accuracy of the 2010 census could be in peril because the U.S. Census Bureau has not corrected some long-standing problems and has eliminated some of its precensus work.
Officials from the Government Accountability Office, the investigative arm of Congress, told the Senate Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee on Wednesday that of particular concern is the Census Bureau’s intention to equip census-takers with hand-held devices for managing and verifying information.
These devices were obtained through a $596 million contract that, because of delays and cost overruns, now stands at $624 million. What’s more, auditors say, the devices gave “slow and inconsistent data transmissions” during census “dress rehearsals” last year.
In addition, GAO auditors say the Census Bureau has failed to plan for how it intends to monitor and assess the performance of these devices and doesn’t have a clear idea of how much it is going to cost to make the necessary revisions. Rough estimates, the GAO says, run from $600 million to $2 billion.
The GAO went so far as to add the U.S. Census to its “High Risk” list, which is a list of federal programs or areas that need reforms to prevent waste, fraud and mismanagement. The GAO was not set to update the list until 2009. However, the continuing problems with the Census Bureau’s 2010 plan prompted the GAO to note the inadequacies sooner to give the Census Bureau time to make improvements.
The U.S. Census, taken every 10 years, affects all areas of government work, from the assignment of congressional seats and setting of policy priorities to the distribution of billions of dollars in federal funding for government programs.
Even when it works at its best, the U.S. Census can hardly keep up with the population trends that affect fast-growing areas such as Nevada. But the Census Bureau and the Commerce Department, which oversees the bureau, should take some serious action to make improvements to ensure the outcome of the 2010 census is accurate.
Discussion: 1 comment so far…
Post a comment
- Most Read
- Discussed
- Most E-mailed
- Why no principled conservative would seriously contend that Palin belongs on the ticket
- Photos show jail cell similar to Simpson’s
- Man who died in ATV crash identified
- Where does Gibbons work? Apparently not at his desk
- Kimbo Slice finished by virtual unknown in 14 seconds
- Rushed law threatens regulation
- Rain, lightning, thunder gone from Las Vegas
- Suspects sought in fatal shooting of wife, mother
- Oldest ‘footprints’ on Earth found in Nevada
- Romney visit rallies more than GOP base
Blogs
Politics: Ralston's Flash
The battle to save Beers begins (2 Comments)
Shark Bytes
(Almost) Itchin' for college hoops (1 Comment)
Gaming and Business
CityCenter secures $1.8 billion; Wynn avoiding worst of crunch
Politics: The Early Line
Nevada political roundup: Market meltdown and weekend highlights (1 Comment)
Bloggity, Bloggity, Bloggity
Tony tames Talladega (6 Comments)
Elsewhere
Oldest 'footprints' on Earth found in Nevada (4 Comments)
Kimbo Slice finished by virtual unknown in 14 seconds (4 Comments)
Sports: Upon Further Review
Ex-Gorman star Murray scores twice for No. 1 Sooners
Calendar
Conor McPherson's Shining City at the Judy Bayley Theater at UNLV
(8 p.m. to 11 p.m. Judy Bayley Theatre)
- Icons of Tiffany Collection on display at Tiffany & Co. (10 a.m. to 11:59 p.m.)
- Football Mondays at the House of Blues (5 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.)
- Jeff McBride Magic at the Edge at Palace Station (7:30 p.m.)
- Legends in Concert (7:30 p.m.)
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.

The use of sampling techniques to generate a census would be both less expensive and far more accurate. Unfortunately, the Republican Party has blocked efforts to do just this because the people undercounted by the census are traditional Democrats in states that are traditionally Democratic. Adding more people to such states could have the effect of giving them representation in Congress at the expense of Republican seats, not to mention the sending of federal dollars into Democratic districts. As is stands right now, Republicans in the Senate already represent far fewer people than do the Democrats. Feinstein and Boxer of California represent some 33 million people, while Enzi and Barrasso of Wyoming represent fewer than half a million. As we continue to undercount Democratic voters because of outdated counting techniques, we exacerbate the problem of one party wielding power in this country all out of proportion to their strength in terms of population.