Letter to the editor:
Profits are trumping patients’ interests
Tuesday, March 4, 2008 | 2:04 a.m.
Syringes being reused to save money? Doctors and nurses seeking a profit rather than upholding the Hippocratic oath to keep the sick from “harm and injustice”?
Are we really surprised? Medicine is a for-profit industry. It follows that when you cut costs, net profits rise. Obviously, doctors have to cut costs where they can, and it isn’t shocking that oftentimes a desire to make money comes before the best interest of the patient.
If police or fire departments (also essential to public safety) were in the business of making money, we would expect fires to go unheeded that weren’t worth the money to put out. Dangerous criminals would be running loose on the streets because keeping them locked up is too expensive.
The problem with operating a service essential to public safety for a profit (What about the staff members at the clinic who didn’t blow the whistle? Maybe they had bills to pay?) is that the best interest of the patient will always be left in the dust as long as there is money to be made.
Vote for a presidential candidate with a meaningful health care plan this fall. If you’re still alive.
Discussion: 1 comment so far…
Post a comment
- Most Read
- Discussed
- Most E-mailed
- Police: 3 arrested in officer’s death have gang ties
- Corrections officer with Metro killed in U.S. 95 crash
- System fails to catch contractor’s family tie with county
- Where to watch UFC 106
- Fontainebleau contractors say sales process is flawed
- UNLV and Southern Illinois will be guarded tonight
- SEC sues former gaming exec for alleged insider trading
- Station Casinos, lenders agree to rent decrease at 4 properties
- Findlay guard Joseph scores 33, talks about UNLV
- Bishop Gorman takes Sunset Region title in win over Cimarron
Blogs
The Kats Report
For props, Lewis Black needs only his manic delivery and torrid material (3 Comments)
Elsewhere
Sands China raises $2.5 billion in Hong Kong IPO (1 Comment)
Marquardt v. Sonnen scheduled for UFC 109
Bloggity, Bloggity, Bloggity
Will a fourth consecutive title by Jimmie Johnson be good or bad for NASCAR? (3 Comments)
Top Chef: Las Vegas
The Jet Stream: And then there were four
Top Chef Episode 12: On keeping it simple
Miech Again
Chilly start for Chace, but Stanback says he'll warm up (2 Comments)
- Live chat
- Tuesday, noon PST
- Chat with Krista Creelman
- Problem Gambling Center executive director Krista Creelman will answer questions about gambling addiction from Las Vegas Sun readers from noon to 1 p.m. Tuesday, Nov. ... Submit question
Calendar »
- 22 Sun
- 23 Mon
- 24 Tue
- 25 Wed
- 26 Thu
-
UFC 106 at Mandalay Bay Events Center
Mandalay Bay Events Center | 7 p.m. to 11 p.m.
-
Julio Iglesias at the Las Vegas Hilton
Las Vegas Hilton
-
Natasha Wicks hosts at Hawaiian Tropic Zone
Hawaiian Tropic Zone | 10 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.
-
Tito Ortiz hosts at Tao
Tao | 10 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.
-
Hiroshima at Santa Fe Station
Santa Fe Station
-
Frank Mir hosts at LAX
LAX Nightclub | 10 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.
-
The Four Tops at The Orleans Showroom
Orleans Hotel-Casino
-
Amir Sadollah hosts at Prive
Prive | 10 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.
Technorati










I completely agree with this letter. Medical services CAN'T work in a for profit environment, since the number one method of increasing profits is cutting costs. Imagine if our military, police, or fire departments were for profit. That would be somewhat of a farce.
In the old days, there were private fire departments. If you paid, they put the fire out on your property. If you didn't, your house burned down. Then some smart person figured out that if their neighbor's house burned down because of lack of payment, it might just burn your house down. In otherwords, it is in the best economic interest of both Republicans and Democrats to have government paid for fire departments.
The same analogy goes for medical care. It is economically bad for the USA to have for-profit healthcare. Especially when our businesses are competing with other countries.
So whoever you vote for, if they don't believe in a national health care solution, your candidate must like wasting money and endangering lives.