SUN EDITORIAL:
Revisit old mining law
House’s ban on uranium mining permits near Grand Canyon is a temporary fix at best
Monday, June 30, 2008 | 2:07 a.m.
A House committee has banned the federal government from issuing new mining claims on land abutting Grand Canyon National Park.
The House Natural Resources Committee has, but rarely uses, the authority to pass such a resolution, which Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne is required to enforce, the Las Vegas Sun’s Phoebe Sweet reported. The resolution passed 20-2 on Thursday.
The number of uranium mining permits issued on land adjacent to the Grand Canyon since 2003 has risen from about 10 to more than 1,100. Environmental activists and officials from the Southern Nevada Water Authority told the House committee that such an increase in mining operations could adversely affect the Colorado River and other features of the Grand Canyon.
The U.S. Forest Service came under heavy criticism this year when it approved a British company’s request to do exploratory uranium drilling in the Kaibab National Forest, roughly three miles from a popular Grand Canyon National Park overlook.
That approval came after an environmental review process that was less stringent than reviews required for coal, oil and gas exploration projects. A mining law passed in 1872 does not require a full public hearing or formal environmental assessment for ore operations.
Last week’s resolution would not affect the British company’s project or other existing claims. But it does stop new claims — unless, of course, the Bush administration ignores it, as Interior Secretary James Watt did back in 1983. Activists sued to force Watt to comply.
And we certainly wouldn’t be surprised if Kempthorne and White House officials choose to ignore the House resolution. President Bush has ignored orders from Congress and even the Supreme Court on other issues.
Still, Congress ought to use the permitting hiatus created by this resolution to revisit the 1872 mining law. Things have changed a lot since then. It seems reasonable that ore operations should be subjected to the same environmental scrutiny as any other project in which natural resources are extracted from public lands.
Most Popular
- Viewed
- Discussed
- E-mailed
- Fertittas putting another $73 million into Station Casinos
- ‘Peepshow’ at Planet Hollywood celebrates 1,000th performance tonight
- Living in the shadows: Immigrants struggle to access domestic violence services
- Our success may hinge on embracing a bohemian philosophy
- Tickets for Saturday’s San Diego State game selling quickly
- Our list of Las Vegas ties to this year’s Super Bowl
- After beleaguered caucus, GOP leaders consider switch to primary
- UFC photos: Carlos Condit, Nick Diaz, Georges St-Pierre, Fabricio Werdum, more
- President Obama was asking for it
- Las Vegas Mob Experience gets new name, owner and manager
Blogs
The Kats Report
A sophisticated look at line-moving and dog-show handicapping from Wynn's Johnny Avello
Elsewhere
Update 2: Caesars IPO pricing delayed due to "glitch" - underwriter
The Kats Report
A party replete with Carrot Top, 'AGT' contestants, a couple of Blue Men, deep-fried Oreos ... oh, and the Super Bowl (1 Comment)
High School Sports Scene
High School Hoops Picks: Week 7
The Kats Report
Motley Crue at the Joint: We've got a situation on our hands (4 Comments)
Elsewhere
Casino bill all but dies as Fresen postpones vote
The Kats Report
Presidential palate also includes margherita pizzas from Due Forni (1 Comment)
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.



Post a comment
Commenting requires registration.
Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy.
If you would like to submit your comment as a letter to the editor, you may submit it here.