SUN EDITORIAL:
Revisit old mining law
House’s ban on uranium mining permits near Grand Canyon is a temporary fix at best
Mon, Jun 30, 2008 (2:07 a.m.)
A House committee has banned the federal government from issuing new mining claims on land abutting Grand Canyon National Park.
The House Natural Resources Committee has, but rarely uses, the authority to pass such a resolution, which Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne is required to enforce, the Las Vegas Sun’s Phoebe Sweet reported. The resolution passed 20-2 on Thursday.
The number of uranium mining permits issued on land adjacent to the Grand Canyon since 2003 has risen from about 10 to more than 1,100. Environmental activists and officials from the Southern Nevada Water Authority told the House committee that such an increase in mining operations could adversely affect the Colorado River and other features of the Grand Canyon.
The U.S. Forest Service came under heavy criticism this year when it approved a British company’s request to do exploratory uranium drilling in the Kaibab National Forest, roughly three miles from a popular Grand Canyon National Park overlook.
That approval came after an environmental review process that was less stringent than reviews required for coal, oil and gas exploration projects. A mining law passed in 1872 does not require a full public hearing or formal environmental assessment for ore operations.
Last week’s resolution would not affect the British company’s project or other existing claims. But it does stop new claims — unless, of course, the Bush administration ignores it, as Interior Secretary James Watt did back in 1983. Activists sued to force Watt to comply.
And we certainly wouldn’t be surprised if Kempthorne and White House officials choose to ignore the House resolution. President Bush has ignored orders from Congress and even the Supreme Court on other issues.
Still, Congress ought to use the permitting hiatus created by this resolution to revisit the 1872 mining law. Things have changed a lot since then. It seems reasonable that ore operations should be subjected to the same environmental scrutiny as any other project in which natural resources are extracted from public lands.
- Most Read
- Discussed
- Most E-mailed
- Boy, 17, stabbed to death in church parking lot identified
- Casino win on Strip declines 8th straight month
- McCain’s absence vexes Nevada backers
- Court: Wynn tip dispute to be decided by Labor Commissioner
- Man arrested in deadly stabbing of mother
- Drug cartel’s hidden Nevada pot farm seized
- Wynn: Encore will take hit despite ‘position of strength’
- Gambler pursues very small claim
- Dust affecting travel on Interstate 15
- Obama rally brings Timberlake to town
Blogs
Sports: UNLV
Women's soccer match moved to noon Saturday
Sports: Upon Further Review
Lopez '100 percent' a Rebel; two ex-Pilots return to Findlay
Politics: Ralston's Flash
Group accuses Beers opponent of "fuzzy math"
Elsewhere
UFC's White upset by rumors of fixed fight (1 Comment)
Sports: Upon Further Review
Pardy is first Wranglers skater to play in NHL
Dyachenko nets a 2-2 tie for United in Costa Rica
The Greene Room
Mayne excited to do what he does best at Thomas & Mack next Friday (1 Comment)
Politics: The Early Line
Nevada political roundup: Stocks slide, VP candidates
Calendar
- Opeth at the House of Blues (6 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.)
- Safe Nest Capital Campaign Kick Off Dinner at Kennedy Tavern (6 p.m. to 10 p.m.)
- That's What She Said at Jillian's (6 p.m. to 10 p.m.)
- Yngwie Malmsteen at the House of Blues (7:30 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.)
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.


Post a comment
Commenting requires registration.
Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Full comments policy.