SUN EDITORIAL:
Tanning’s deadly risk
Inveterate tanners, usually young women, chance getting cancer, study shows
Sat, Jul 19, 2008 (2:04 a.m.)
In light of a report released last week, young women should be asking themselves: Is getting bronzed through prolonged tannning worth the risk of slowly dying from skin cancer?
It is a question, actually, for everyone, as ultraviolet rays from both the sun and tanning beds can harm skin cells without prejudice to age or gender. But the demographics of tanning are indisputable — far and away more young women participate than anyone else.
The report was written by Mark Purdue of the National Cancer Institute, whose research team reviewed 31 years of U.S. melanoma statistics.
Although the rate of melanoma — the deadliest form of skin cancer — was found to have remained steady among men, the results for young women were alarming. For every 100,000 women 15 to 39 years old there were 5.5 cases of melanoma in 1973. By 1980 there were nearly 11 cases. And by 2004 there were 16.5 cases.
The study suggested, naturally, that frequent use of tanning salons, patronized mostly by young women, could be a reason for the rising statistics. Others agreed. CBS News anchor Katie Couric interviewed Dr. Jeanine Downie, a dermatologist.
“Let’s say an average of 1 million people tan per day,” Downie said. “And of that, 71 percent of tanning salon patrons are young women. So there’s your answer.”
Newsday interviewed Dr. Colette Pameijer, a cancer surgeon. “I personally think tanning is absolutely related to it,” Pameijer said. “It’s like an addiction for women.”
The Los Angeles Times interviewed Dr. John Glaspy, a professor of medicine at UCLA’s cancer center. He spoke to the sources of harmful ultraviolet radiation. “The first is ... the sun ... and the other is tanning salons,” he said.
Downie also reminded viewers that pollution has depleted the atmosphere’s ozone layer, which protects Earth from the sun’s ultraviolet radiation. “This is not our grandmother’s sun,” she said.
We hope young women — and all those overexposing themselves to natural or artificial sunlight — begin weighing the short-term benefits of a nice tan against the possible consequences later in life.
Discussion: 1 comment so far…
Post a comment
- Most Read
- Discussed
- Most E-mailed
- Photos show jail cell similar to Simpson’s
- Man who died in ATV crash identified
- Suspects sought in fatal shooting of wife, mother
- Rain, lightning, thunder gone from Las Vegas
- Oldest ‘footprints’ on Earth found in Nevada
- 11-year-old bicyclist killed in collision identified
- Plaza owners in New York win naming fight in Vegas
- How times have changed: Now shopping center is news
- CityCenter secures $1.8 billion; Wynn avoiding worst of crunch
- Man dies in ATV crash south of Las Vegas
Blogs
Now and Then
Offensive lineman featured on video game box cover
Sports: UNLV
Kruger gets reserve time at the point for Bucks (1 Comment)
Shoughro continues to shine for women's soccer
Politics: Ralston's Flash
The battle to save Beers begins (6 Comments)
Shark Bytes
(Almost) Itchin' for college hoops (3 Comments)
Gaming and Business
CityCenter secures $1.8 billion; Wynn avoiding worst of crunch (1 Comment)
Politics: The Early Line
Nevada political roundup: Market meltdown and weekend highlights (1 Comment)
Bloggity, Bloggity, Bloggity
Tony tames Talladega (7 Comments)
Calendar
- My Time, My Story osteoporosis awareness event (9:30 a.m. to noon)
- The Mac King Comedy Magic Show (1 p.m.)
- Paseo Verde Book Discussion on the book "Marley & Me" (3:30 p.m. to 5:30 p.m.)
- "Shared Ideas, Stolen Spaces" at Left of Center Art Gallery (9 a.m. to 6 p.m.)
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.


Is living itself worth the risk of slowly dying? Sheesh - if we stop doing everything except eating exactly right, exercising the precise amount, and minimizing ALL self-inherent risk, we might live an extra five years ... Or we might get hit by a bus today. Everything in moderation, folks, because immortality is an impossible goal to chase.