Sun Editorial:
Penalized at 65
New rule that allows employers to dump retirees’ health coverage is unfair
Monday, Jan. 7, 2008 | 2 a.m.
The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has announced that employers can reduce or eliminate health benefits for retirees who have turned 65 and are eligible for Medicare.
The new policy creates two classes of retirees those younger than 65 who get the full benefits promised to them and those 65 and older, who could lose health coverage they have been using or had counted on when they retired.
Naomi Earp, EEOC chairwoman, told The New York Times last week that the new rule was designed to help companies continue offering benefits to the nation’s 10 million retirees who depend on employer-provided programs for primary coverage or to supplement Medicare.
Critics of the new policy say that rather than reducing benefits, companies more likely will opt to dump retirees 65 and older. A lawyer for the AARP told the Times that the new rule appears to contradict the 1967 Age Discrimination in Employment Act. The EEOC has said the 1967 law allows exemptions that are “necessary and proper in the public interest.”
It is obvious, however, that this new policy is in industry’s best interests. Federal officials are already trying to figure out how to sustain the Medicare program financially, and flooding it with millions of new participants who previously had private coverage is shortsighted.
This policy also is unfair to workers who may have based salary and benefits package decisions they made years ago on the fact that their companies would continue to offer them coverage when they retired. Even workers who planned are penalized by this change.
Medicare coverage is not the same as privately provided coverage, and retirees who were promised the latter should continue to receive it no matter what their age.
Benefits for existing retirees should be protected, and the new rules should apply only to younger people who are still working and have time to plan for their retirement health coverage.
- Most Read
- Discussed
- Most E-mailed
- Corrections officer with Metro killed in U.S. 95 crash
- System fails to catch contractor’s family tie with county
- Fontainebleau contractors say sales process is flawed
- Where to watch UFC 106
- UNLV and Southern Illinois will be guarded tonight
- Findlay guard Joseph scores 33, talks about UNLV
- The pull of a drug, a push to the brink
- Bishop Gorman takes Sunset Region title in win over Cimarron
- Fighters make weight, Dana White talks Rampage/Rashad
- Reid clears major health care hurdle, daunting weeks ahead
Blogs
The Kats Report
For props, Lewis Black needs only his manic delivery and torrid material (6 Comments)
Elsewhere
Sands China raises $2.5 billion in Hong Kong IPO (1 Comment)
Marquardt v. Sonnen scheduled for UFC 109
Bloggity, Bloggity, Bloggity
Will a fourth consecutive title by Jimmie Johnson be good or bad for NASCAR? (4 Comments)
Top Chef: Las Vegas
The Jet Stream: And then there were four
Top Chef Episode 12: On keeping it simple
Miech Again
Chilly start for Chace, but Stanback says he'll warm up (2 Comments)
- Live chat
- Tuesday, noon PST
- Chat with Krista Creelman
- Problem Gambling Center executive director Krista Creelman will answer questions about gambling addiction from Las Vegas Sun readers from noon to 1 p.m. Tuesday, Nov. ... Submit question
Calendar »
- 22 Sun
- 23 Mon
- 24 Tue
- 25 Wed
- 26 Thu
-
The Four Tops at The Orleans Showroom
Orleans Hotel-Casino
-
The Chase at Downtown Cocktail Room
Downtown Cocktail Room | 10 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.
-
Lady Gaga album release party at Revolution Lounge
Beatles Revolution Lounge | 10 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.
-
Food drive at Christian Audigier
Christian Audigier The Nightclub | 10 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.
-
Above & Beyond at Moon
Moon Nightclub | 10 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.
Technorati













Post a comment
Commenting requires registration.
Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Full comments policy.