Letter to the editor:
A preamble in Second Amendment?
Tuesday, Feb. 26, 2008 | 2:03 a.m.
I recently heard a gun advocate explain the Second Amendment in the following manner. I paraphrase: The first part of the amendment, the part that reads, “A well-regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free state,” is a preamble to “the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed.”
While I don’t embrace the concept of its being a preamble, I am willing to view it from that aspect for the sake of debate. First, we must establish just what a preamble is. The most commonly accepted definition of the word is “an introduction.” The American Heritage Dictionary defines it, in its first definition, as follows: “A preliminary statement, especially the introduction of a formal document that explains its purpose.”
If the first part of the Second Amendment is a preamble, then that means it explains the purpose of the second part. That means the purpose of the people’s right to “keep and bear arms” is to maintain a well-regulated militia in order to secure a free state. The states, then, are burdened with the responsibility of determining what is necessary to maintain a well-regulated militia.
I’ve never viewed the Second Amendment as being two separate parts. I have always thought of it as an assurance to the 13 states of their right to protect their federalist standing from the central government. Why the states have chosen to abandon the civilian army (militia) in favor of the National Guard which I view as part of the standing army is a mystery.
If this session of the Supreme Court determines that the Second Amendment has a preamble, then that would vindicate the decision rendered in 1939 in United States v. Miller.
Discussion: 1 comment so far…
Post a comment
- Most Read
- Discussed
- Most E-mailed
- The pull of a drug, a push to the brink
- Was there an ulterior motive in parking the stripper-mobile?
- CityCenter hotel welcomes new employees with gala
- Notebook: The Shark and LJ circle
- Harry Reid’s hopes hitched to health care reform bill
- Forrest Griffin writes his own ending at UFC 106
- Reid clears major health care hurdle, daunting weeks ahead
- Politicians waste no time spinning latest jobless numbers
- What might result from a national airing of Ensign’s dirty laundry
- Willis makes big difference in UNLV’s 78-69 victory
Blogs
Robin Leach's Las Vegas Celebrity Watch
Photo Gallery: Donny’s correct prediction of Osmond vs. Osbourne
Politics: The Early Line
Sen. John Ensign affair to resurface on 'Nightline' (1 Comment)
The Greene Room
MWC Winners and Losers: Week 12 (1 Comment)
Culture and Entertainment
UFC 106 walk-in music: Griffin changes his tune, secures win over Ortiz
The Kats Report
For props, Lewis Black needs only his manic delivery and torrid material (9 Comments)
Elsewhere
Sands China raises $2.5 billion in Hong Kong IPO (2 Comments)
Marquardt v. Sonnen scheduled for UFC 109
- Live chat
- Tuesday, noon PST
- Chat with Krista Creelman
- Problem Gambling Center executive director Krista Creelman will answer questions about gambling addiction from Las Vegas Sun readers from noon to 1 p.m. Tuesday, Nov. ... Submit question
Calendar »
- 23 Mon
- 24 Tue
- 25 Wed
- 26 Thu
- 27 Fri
-
DJ Scooter at Prive
Prive | 10 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.
-
Fabolous's birthday at Jet
Jet | 10 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.
-
Mixology Monday at Downtown Cocktail Room
Downtown Cocktail Room | 8 p.m. to 11 p.m.
-
DJ Red at Tabu
Tabú Ultralounge | 10 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.
-
The Automatic Tour at The Square Apple
The Square Apple
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.
Technorati














Note the operative word is "bear" not "shoot."
No person should be allowed to possess an operative weapon except in their official capacity as a member of the militia (military or law enforcement).