Las Vegas Sun

July 6, 2009

Currently: 88° | Complete forecast | Log in

THE ECONOMY:

We talk diversification, we don’t accomplish it

Nevada has failed in many attempts to lure nongaming industries

Sun, Dec 21, 2008 (2 a.m.)

Audio Clip

  • Steve Wynn on the economy in Las Vegas.
  • You need to upgrade your Flash Player

Identifying the challenge facing Nevada is a no-brainer for Jan Jones.

“We have to quit focusing on what we do well — we do resorts well — and focus on what we don’t do well: the quality of life and developing a city that is more than life support for gaming.”

In other words, diversify.

Jones, the former mayor of Las Vegas, issued that challenge not last week, as unemployment reached 8 percent, nor in January, when the recession was claiming its foothold on the Strip.

She made her assessment to the Los Angeles Times in 1997, when the gaming industry was halfway through an unprecedented 20-year expansion, opening at least a resort a year.

What’s changed in 11 years?

“Nothing,” said Jones, who’s now senior vice president of communications and government affairs for Harrah’s Entertainment.

Nevada’s efforts at economic diversification, however earnest, have failed. As one Nevada researcher put it, “We haven’t gotten very far. But we keep a lot of people employed working on it.”

Of course, there is no assurance, depending on the gravity of a recession, that a region with a diversified economy would weather an economic storm any better than a single-themed company town, as Las Vegas is with tourism.

But when a one-trick pony breaks its leg and there’s no horse in reserve, the ride can get a lot rougher. It’s an economic liability Nevada has acknowledged off and on over the years but never seriously addressed.

State leaders realized gaming wasn’t recession-proof more than a quarter-century ago, when the 1981-82 recession rocked the country and shook the casino industry, dramatically slowing Nevada’s growth. Exacerbating the problem, Atlantic City had just introduced gaming. Nevada lost its monopoly.

Richard Bryan, then running for governor, offered up a policy paper promoting economic diversification, titled “Nevada: Gaming and So Much More.”

But there wasn’t so much more.

“All of a sudden, we felt the impact,” Bryan said of the recession. “My first month in office, we weren’t sure the state payroll would clear.”

Diversification became Priority One and soon Bryan was on the hunt to lure nongaming companies here. Traveling to New York, he persuaded Citicorp executives to open a credit-card processing plant in Las Vegas. He even called a special session of the Legislature to repeal the state usury law, paving the way for Citicorp and a few hundred jobs.

Bryan instituted a jet-fuel tax to fund an office of economic development while, in Las Vegas, the Nevada Development Authority was trying to recruit new business to Southern Nevada.

There was talk of courting high-tech companies to Las Vegas when gaming not just recovered but exploded with a new wave of luxury resorts. On the state level, diversification was placed on the back burner.

Keith Schwer, director of the Center for Business and Economic Research at UNLV, summarized the prevailing view at the time: “We didn’t need anything other than gaming. It was on the ascendancy and we were very good at it. We were riding the fast horse.”

The Nevada Development Authority continued its efforts with scant funding, as did Henderson and North Las Vegas. The easy pitch: Nevada’s low-tax environment and business-friendly government. The state has no corporate income tax, no personal income tax and its worker compensation and power rates are considerably lower than those of adjacent states, such as California, says A. Somer Hollingsworth, president and chief executive of the Nevada Development Authority.

It seemed a simple elixir to attract out-of-state businesses here. Indeed, the recruiting agency’s phone number is 888-4-NO-TAXES.

Economists offer a more complex view.

Although recent economic studies show taxes are a rising concern for business, they generally remain low on the list of priorities of a company considering relocation.

More important is the availability of skilled, educated labor, says Robert Tannenwald, economist at the Boston Fed and director of the New England Public Policy Center.

And it’s usually found in communities with quality education, including research universities.

That’s why Colorado, with a first-class research university system, has emerged as a hub for the aerospace, biosciences and renewable energy industries.

Consider the past 18 months: Vestas, the Danish wind-power company, has committed to building three plants, employing up to 1,300 workers; RES, a British renewable energy developer, is setting up shop; and ConocoPhillips has purchased land to build a renewable-energy lab, employing as many as 7,000 people.

The synergy promotes still more economic growth.

“It feeds off itself,” said Gary Horvath, chief economist at the University of Colorado, Boulder. “That’s how it works.”

Nevada might seem a place to build a renewable energy industry, given its potential to power the entire country with solar.

And toward that goal, Nevada has had some success.

It’s home to Solar One, one of the world’s largest solar thermal power plants, and, this summer, Ausra opened a solar manufacturing plant in Las Vegas. But even those companies are building their new projects in neighboring states, partly because of Nevada’s weak workforce.

Johns Hopkins University recently characterized many of Clark County’s public high schools as “dropout factories,” meaning they lose at least 40 percent of their children between freshman and senior years. Just 13 percent of Clark County residents 25 or older have bachelor’s degrees, well below the national average.

Saddled with an educationally deficient workforce, the Nevada Development Authority’s overall recruiting successes are couched in terms of call centers (Citibank), warehouses (Amazon.com, Levi Strauss) and Ocean Spray’s bottling plant.

Soon, the authority will announce it has landed more call centers — including one with 1,000 seats — as those businesses return from overseas in droves because of language complaints from American customers.

In recent years, Hollingsworth’s staff has struggled to attract the three industries it most wants — high-tech, life sciences and renewable energy. Over the past year, the authority says, it has landed two renewable energy companies, one telecommunications company and 40 other companies, none with more than 100 employees.

And that is still small pickings by some civic leaders’ measure.

“The problem is we lack the appropriate infrastructure to hit home runs,” said Billy Vassiliadis, owner of the public affairs and advertising firm R&R Partners. “We hit a lot of singles.”

University system Chancellor Jim Rogers echoed the concern. “We have a first-class economy and a third-class culture,” he said. “And eventually a third-class culture will bring down a first-class economy.”

Investment in education must be paramount, said Rogers, who also serves as vice-chairman of the Nevada Development Authority’s executive committee. “The pitch we’ve always given is that we’re a no-tax state. It’s true people want to pay as few taxes as possible, but it makes no sense to pay no taxes and have no real education system. We are never going to get people to come here unless we’re serious about education.”

And if that means raising or introducing taxes, so be it, Rogers said. The chancellor promoted the idea of a lottery and a broad-based business tax in his weekly memo last week. He noted that more funding is particularly important for UNLV’s nascent research programs. Other schools, such as neighboring University of Arizona, are attracting hundreds of millions of dollars in research grants, he said.

“We started late, we have not adequately competed and we’re going to have to do extra things,” Rogers said. “If they’re going 80 miles per hour, we’ve got to go 100.”

Or not, says Steve Wynn.

Eleven years ago, the casino mogul challenged business leaders to think hard about where Las Vegas was going, and to consider diversification. Today, he seems resigned to the status quo.

“The rewards for the energy applied have been limited,” Wynn said. “Economic diversification is not going to take place here. Nothing new or startling is going to happen here.”

Jones was more optimistic, citing the planned performing arts center as one more recruiting tool. Jones said she hopes the economic crisis has been “real enough” this time to get business and political leaders to commit to a strategy of diversification.

“If you really want to diversify, you have to fix education, our competitiveness with other cities and states, build the cultural amenities. Quality of life is non-negotiable,” she said. “Are they really going to do it this time or are they just going to talk about it?”

For his part, Hollingsworth will march on. He concedes, begrudgingly, that the state’s educational system has been an obstacle to attracting his target industries. He recalled a recruiting trip to Silicon Valley, where he said entrepreneurs looked at him as if he were a “Neanderthal.”

But, UNLV’s science and engineering programs, in addition to the Nevada Cancer Institute and the Lou Ruvo Brain Institute, have changed that, Hollingsworth said. The Nevada Development Authority has newfound credibility when it recruits now, he said.

The state says it will try to help, but its Commission on Economic Development, like other state agencies, has been hit by budget cuts. Its executive director, Michael Skaggs, said 70 companies are thinking about moving to Nevada. Most are in the manufacturing sector and 14 are related to renewable energy, he said.

Still, he says, Nevada faces an uphill battle in part because “we just don’t have that name,” citing scientific research centers, such as Stanford University.

“We’re behind but it’s because we’ve started late,” he said. “We’ve got so much more to do to get this state to where it’s really diversified.”

Sun reporter Liz Benston contributed to this report.

Discussion: 12 comments so far…

  1. Key words: skilled, educated labor. The casinos prefer employees that aren't. Not only are they less expensive, but they don't/can't do critical thinking so it's easier to treat them as poorly as they do while telling them how they're valued. As long as we continue to kowtow to gaming, we will never be competitive. Oh, and the over-the-top corruption in both business and government doesn't help either.

  2. Many intelligent, educated people won't live here, especially if they want to send their kids to public schools.

    What is most lacking in education here is a will to improve it.

    Any city or state so dominated by one industry will have problems stemming from a lack of balance and diversity.

    Ditto to FTW comments.

  3. Lets raise taxes on all business activity.

    That will greatly encourage diversification.

  4. Jan Jones is very well known for her accomplishments or should I say failures. The Neonapolis and all of the foolishness associated with the obnoxious over head show on Freemont Steet has cost tax payers millions while doing very little to promte anything of value, while enriching her friends and cohorts.
    Jan Lones was a joke,is a joke and will always be a joke. She behaves as if she is an arsitocrat or part of the royal families monarchy. She did juice herself into a job with a once first rate gaming concern which will in time be broke.

  5. 1) Nevada cannot power the whole country with solar energy, that is nonsense and not even journalism
    2) Taxes aren't high on the list for companies because their competition, in state, pays it too. When it comes to interstate and international competition taxes matter a lot.
    3) yes education is important, but our economic diversification projects involve bringing high tech and green companies in who already have their own employees.
    4) Even if our education system was better, and more spending won't achieve that, all subsidies to attract new business will ONLY result in new companies unfairly competing against existing companies. Meaning we give new companies millions of dollars. They hire away the good workers from existing companies.

    If you want economic diversification, eliminate the MBT. That tax punishes companies from hiring more people AND paying employees MORE money. Keep taxes low and reduce Nevada's regulatory structure (we rank in the high 30s there) and for god's sake try real education reform.

  6. Research grants are partially nothing more subsidies to universities so it can peddle more research dollars...aka subsidies to rich people.

    Research grants DO NOT, and I repeat, DO NOT, enter the classroom. They DO NOT educate our children in college and they DO NOT prepare our college students for the real world.

    They are nothing more than subsidies for wealthy and intelligent people working in the science and academic community. Period.

  7. CORRUPTION and CRONYISM is also a major reason why diverse businesses steer clear of Las Vegas. Our judicial system has been called by the ATRA - as a "Judicial Hellhole". Government BY the casinos FOR the casinos - yet the Greenspuns and R&R partners are now thinking about diversity. The horse has left the barn.

  8. It's far, far too late in the game for NevaDUH to even think about becoming a university research center.

    The mold was cast long ago that this state would be nothing but a gambling/brothel/corporate tax haven so don't act all surprised now that this is all it turned out to be.

    And don't bet the farm NevaDUH's going to become some sort of a solar mecca since it certainly doesn't have a monopoly on the sun. The research grants will go to states which also have a lot of sun but also have the university system to turn grant $$$ into actual products.

    About all NevaDUH does have is a great abundance of precious minerals which are literally being stolen from under our noses. But you won't find Boss Reid doing anything about that!

  9. Solar power will not be able to supply even 30% of Nevada's needs.

    I tell you a little secret....the Sun does not shine 24/7 and not a whole lot during the winter.

    The expensive storage tech only has about a 4 to 6 hour life.

  10. Writing from Detroit. Yet this discussion sounds entirely familiar.

    Discussion of business diversification activity is hijacked by
    1) low-tax agenda proponents,
    2) protesters of corruption in present organizations {see UAW and Big3.}
    3) current power brokers discouraging anything but status quo.

    If Nevada wants to be like Michigan, just keep listening to these sources and to contributers like nay-sayer KDR81. Don't 'Low-tax' yourself into a 'one-trick pony' canyon.

    If you create a significant public utility based on your solar strength, it may well attract attention. If you make experts and property access available, they could create start-ups. The Fed may soon require electricity suppliers who burn coal to invest in low-emission sources. Let Nevada be the most prepared for this shift. Start an Institute for Conversion and Storage of Solar Energy. Produce engineers who can squeeze more power out of a collection cell and pack more power into a battery.

    Follow the status quo and you may end up like Michigan: few auto engineering or auto assembly jobs left, no significant mass transportation system, empty town centers with nice suburbs full of unemployed people, and sore ears from the never-ending rants of the nay-sayers who squashed civic action.

  11. Funny to read this story juxtaposed to the story about refusing to tax brothels. The industry that WANTS to be taxed!

    Here's a thought. Remember why people come to Nevada (Las Vegas). Then, let's do that well and stop pretending to be California.

    1. Tax brothels and allow them to promote.
    2. Legalize it! (Amsterdam like)
    3. Loosen the slots (notably looser than Indian casinos)
    4. More euro-style pools
    5. Legalize Gay marriage/divorce
    6. Re-establish Sin City image. What happens in Vegas...

    Just my 2.5 cents

  12. You cannot improve educational quality in Nevada without raising standards and that means standard based teaching on the part of teachers with accountability beginning with the superintendant down to the janitorial staff. You've got to keep kids in school to do that so the dropout problem has to be addrssed first. Raising taxes is a mistake. If tax dollars are not being effectively used now (witness the present student failure rate), more money will not solve the problem until the underlying reasons for failure are identified. Nevada can and should have a first class educational system. Money, by itself will not do the job. I speak from experience having worked for many years in money pits like the Los Angeles Unified School District which to this day has been unsuccessful in improving the educational success of its students, especially minority children.

Post a comment

Commenting requires registration.

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Full comments policy.

Username:
Password: (Forgotten your password?)

OR Create an account (It's free)

Email Edition

  • Most Read
  • Discussed
  • Most E-mailed

Calendar

Nove Italiano presents Get Corked

Nove Italiano presents Get Corked

(5:30 p.m. to 10:30 p.m., Nove Italiano)