Report: Wrong kind of resin helped Monte Carlo fire spread
Published Friday, Aug. 29, 2008 | 2:15 p.m.
Updated Friday, Aug. 29, 2008 | 2:53 p.m.
An analysis of materials involved in a fire on the outside of the Monte Carlo Hotel & Casino revealed the use of a non-approved resin in two areas helped spread the blaze, Clark County officials said today.
The Jan. 25 fire started when molten metal fell on the roof as workers used a hand-held torch to cut some metal, fire investigators said.
As a result of the county's analysis, MGM Mirage Corp., parent company of the hotel, is required to hire a Nevada-registered fire protection engineer to recommend a remedy to the issues raised in the analysis, said Ron Lynn, the county's development services director.
Tests on the foam used in the façade indicated it was fire retardant, as required, Lynn said.
The wrong kind of resin was used on two of the decorative bands near the top of the hotel and caused the fire to spread faster than expected in that area, Lynn said.
Fire retardant materials used in construction, fire suppression systems inside the building and rapid response by Clark County firefighters contained the blaze, Lynn said.
There were no serious injuries and fire damage was mostly limited to a small part of the exterior of the hotel, Lynn said.
The report, prepared by Hughes & Associates, was based on tests and analysis by MVA Scientific Consultants.
The lamina in some areas, the report said, is about one to two millimeters thinner than it should be and some decorative elements do not have lamina encasing the foam, the analysis said.
Parts of the exterior do not meet manufacturer's guidelines, as required by code, the report said. While those issues might affect the durability of the exterior materials, they didn't contribute to the fire's spread.
In a statement, Gordon Absher, spokesman for MGM Mirage Corp., said company officials are looking into the report's findings.
"Per the county's direction we will engage a certified analyst to further examine the materials in question. We will submit any recommendations to the county to discuss mitigation, if necessary. The Monte Carlo was built 16 years ago by a previous owner, so we may be able to take advantage of new construction techniques that were unavailable in 1992," according to the statement.
- Most Read
- Discussed
- Most E-mailed
- Police: 3 arrested in officer’s death have gang ties
- Corrections officer with Metro killed in U.S. 95 crash
- System fails to catch contractor’s family tie with county
- Where to watch UFC 106
- Fontainebleau contractors say sales process is flawed
- UNLV and Southern Illinois will be guarded tonight
- Station Casinos, lenders agree to rent decrease at 4 properties
- SEC sues former gaming exec for alleged insider trading
- Findlay guard Joseph scores 33, talks about UNLV
- Bishop Gorman takes Sunset Region title in win over Cimarron
Blogs
The Kats Report
For props, Lewis Black needs only his manic delivery and torrid material (3 Comments)
Elsewhere
Sands China raises $2.5 billion in Hong Kong IPO (1 Comment)
Marquardt v. Sonnen scheduled for UFC 109
Bloggity, Bloggity, Bloggity
Will a fourth consecutive title by Jimmie Johnson be good or bad for NASCAR? (3 Comments)
Top Chef: Las Vegas
The Jet Stream: And then there were four
Top Chef Episode 12: On keeping it simple
Miech Again
Chilly start for Chace, but Stanback says he'll warm up (2 Comments)
- Live chat
- Tuesday, noon PST
- Chat with Krista Creelman
- Problem Gambling Center executive director Krista Creelman will answer questions about gambling addiction from Las Vegas Sun readers from noon to 1 p.m. Tuesday, Nov. ... Submit question
Calendar »
- 22 Sun
- 23 Mon
- 24 Tue
- 25 Wed
- 26 Thu
-
The Four Tops at The Orleans Showroom
Orleans Hotel-Casino
-
Football specials at Diablo's
Diablos Cantina
-
Simon Says Brunch at Simon
Palms Place Hotel & Spa
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.
Technorati












Post a comment
Commenting requires registration.
Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Full comments policy.