DAILY MEMO: EDUCATION:
Funding cuts put schools on defensive again
They’re forced to make an age-old argument
Thursday, Aug. 28, 2008 | 2 a.m.
Teachers and administrators have argued for years that Nevada’s public schools could meet high expectations if they were properly funded.
For two years, they got additional money. Clark County educators said the boost helped the district meet state and federal No Child Left Behind requirements. Heartened by the progress, the Legislature last year approved another $56 million statewide for school improvement and innovation.
But then came the economic downturn and state budget cuts. The money evaporated, including more than $18 million for Clark County. Projects at most campuses won’t leave the starting gate without the money upfront to staff them.
Caroline McIntosh, superintendent of the Lyon County School District and chairwoman of the commission that handed out the grants, said it was devastating to watch Clark County’s money slip away. The cuts represent more lost opportunities than McIntosh cares to count, she said.
Perhaps just as important, they also mean a setback in the public debate. Once again, educators are left to argue, almost as an article of faith, that Nevada’s schools can make true, systemic change if given the money.
And critics again can argue, absent evidence to the contrary, that the issue isn’t whether schools need more money but how the money they have can be spent more wisely. Many schools would be better off financially if more of the budget decisions were made by principals, rather than central office administrators, the critics argue.
It’s the 1990s all over again.
But this time, the cuts keep on coming. After erasing the money for innovation and improvement, the state cut another 14 percent statewide — $133 million in Clark County.
Parents had hoped for more full-day kindergarten classes. Those dollars, $13.6 million, were among the first sliced from the budget.
Cuts were made to programs for gifted and talented students, career and technical education, and other programs that have helped students graduate and find success in life.
Fewer dollars will be available for school supplies. Field trips will be curtailed.
Higher costs of dairy and wheat products and fuel to deliver them mean students will pay more for cafeteria meals.
Many schools now say their first priority is making sure a child has food, shelter and medical care, necessary precursors to academic success. Little money is left over for such “extras,” and the schools often must turn to private donors for help. Principals are becoming fundraisers, with schools as charitable causes.
Perhaps part of the resistance to better funding for schools is that education is sometimes seen as important only to a closed circle: students, parents and teachers.
Educators and others argue that’s a shortsighted view. “I can’t help but think it will hurt the future prosperity of this community not to have an educational system we can brag about,” Clark County Schools Superintendent Walt Rulffes said Wednesday.
Some business leaders have argued that, instead of a financial burden, schools should be seen as an asset to be developed and nurtured — a draw for new residents and a reason for locals raising families to stick around during a downturn.
These business leaders ask: How will Clark County attract the new businesses and industries needed to diversify its economy without offering employers the lure of stellar schools, at both the K-12 and the higher ed levels?
And some of them note that the only businesses in this state that pay taxes are in the gaming industry.
Discussion: comments so far…
Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.
Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.
No trusted comments have been posted.
Post a comment
Most Popular
- Viewed
- Discussed
- E-mailed
- UNLV can move forward without the burden of losing streak to San Diego State
- A wife’s wisdom shows birth control issue needn’t be divisive
- Surprise links, negotiated deals addressed by commissioners
- Motorcycle accident claims life of man in northeast valley
- Hope and change and … what’s missing?
- New York mayor has the right idea
- We don’t need a CEO in charge
- Paying our own way
- Country has ‘given’ citizens a lot
- Jerry Tarkanian: Mike Moser impresses yet again on a day to remember former Rebel greats
Blogs
The Kats Report
Color from scene at Thomas & Mack: We have a wire job! Rebels win, and Louie Armstrong sings!
South Point owner Michael Gaughan's take on 'Vegas Stripped': 'I'll give it an 8' (4 Comments)
Author relishes writing the life story of ‘larger-than-life’ Oscar Goodman (3 Comments)
Elsewhere
Landowner: All roads could lead to Uxbridge casino
Revel reveals smoke-free casino opening
Cirque du Soleil show in Sands China casino to close this month
Meet the woman behind Sheldon Adelson
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.



Food, shelter and medical care should be taken care of by parents. It is not the responsibility of the school system to raise children. It is there responsibilty to educate them! We, the non gobvernment taxpayers, already pay for welfare, medicaid, food stamps, and housing assistance. I like China's 1 child law. If you can't fee them don't breed them. With 34% of the population paying taxws to support the government, it's employees and the 66% of the population, it is time to make some serious changes in how our tax dollars are spent. No more free rides and more accountability!
Uddegboda, giving away free tuition is stupid. All your country does is send kids off to party for several years as they wait for old people in your country to die so they don't get paid the pension anymore so a company now has room to expand. Its a stupid system that wastes money, time, and human capital.
American public education problems has nothing to do with our standards its that administrators have an incentive to waste money, and teachers don't get an incentive to teach as well as they could. We have a monopoly.
A monopoly, which by the way, has had its per pupil funds tripled since 1960.
Here's the memo on that http://npri.org/blog/just-the-facts in case you missed it.
Per Pupil funding must increase just as all things do. You can not get a gallon of gas for $.99 like you could in 1989 so why does anyone think that the cost of educating a child does not rise either. I would also hope that a teaecher making $6-9 thousand dollars in the 1960's is making more money in 2009 - 40+ years latter.
If we want the students in the US to compeate/compaire with other nations we must provide them quality tools - ie computers, and quality staff to teach them how to use those tools. Throwing money at every situation does not just by the act make anything better. BUT - If you want students educated to compeate in the wolrd class market place you must have world class teachers who teach them in a world class settings. SMALLER CLASSS SIZES - SMALLER SCHOOL ENVIRONMENTS - MORE TECHNOLOGY - These are all things that WILL improve student achievment and produce better US citizens that can compeate in the golbal market.
School should be funded as a socail nessesity - Like Police or Fire. Those who work in those fields are trained professionals who dedicate their lives to serving others. Teacher may not always have life or death situations to deal with but they are helping to mold the minds of the leaders of tomorrow. Their task is just as vital to our community.
Lets put funding education in it proper place!
It is unfortunate that the education budget is being cut however in a downward economy that is what must take place. The downward economy doesn't only effect the schools and government. It effects all taxpayers as well. Just look at all the foreclosed homes. Those taxpayer citizens have moved away so we have lost their taxes. Look at the unemployment, etc. All day Kindergarten is not necessary. If it was, they would have started 50 years ago or more.
The remaining taxpayers can not continue to absorb additional taxes. That is the way it is.