Facebook
Fark
Digg
Reddit
StumbleLETTER TO THE EDITOR:
Endangered Species Act is safe and sound
Saturday, Aug. 16, 2008 | 2:04 a.m.
Contrary to the hyperbole in an editorial in Thursday’s Las Vegas Sun, the Endangered Species Act is alive and well. The proposed minor changes in the implementing regulations will not threaten the existence of the act or make it “toothless,” nor will they result in the “extinction of countless species.”
Federal agencies have always been legally responsible for making independent judgments about their proposed actions, but are obliged to consult with the federal Fish and Wildlife Service, or the National Marine Fisheries Service, only on those projects that might affect listed species.
The proposed changes will not eliminate this link for proposed actions that might cause an adverse impact. They will eliminate the need to consult on projects that will affect protected species in either a positive or a neutral way. The changes will also relieve agencies from considering potential impacts that can’t be reasonably linked to their actions or are not reasonably certain to occur.
This is hardly a revolutionary change because it is based on common sense and years of case law. Dale Hall, director of the Fish and Wildlife Service, provided the rationale for the proposed changes when he said, “We are not being good stewards of our resources when we pursue consultation in situations where the potential effects to a species are either unlikely, incapable of being meaningfully evaluated, wholly beneficial, or pose only a remote risk of causing jeopardy to the species or its habitat.”
The Sun’s editorial does a disservice to the numerous environmental scientists working in the Las Vegas Valley for the Energy Department, the Bureau of Land Management, the National Park Service, the Forest Service and the Bureau of Reclamation who review their agency actions in the spirit and letter of the law every day. All of the science and expertise regarding the law isn’t confined to the Fish and Wildlife Service and the National Marine Fisheries Service.
Discussion: comments so far…
Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.
Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.
No trusted comments have been posted.
Post a comment
Everything Under the Sun
Blogs
The Kats Report
Las Vegas Philharmonic says search for new music director to begin 'immediately' (1 Comment)
With Shenandoah project stalled, Wayne Newton hits back legally (7 Comments)
Where does a Playmate play when she turns 21? Vegas! (3 Comments)
Ice Ice Billy
The road to six-toed cats and Mayor Bubba
The Kats Report
David Itkin tells L.V. Philharmonic officials he's on his way out (14 Comments)
Diamond Dave sells it well as Van Halen pours out the power at MGM Grand (2 Comments)
Entering debut at Tryst, Nick Hissom is a model for a rapid rise to prominence (3 Comments)
- Locally owned and independent since 1950; Winner of the Pulitzer Prize for Public Service, best news website in the nation & DuPont Award for broadcast journalism
Tom O’Farrell wrote:
“Contrary to the hyperbole in an editorial in Thursday’s Las Vegas Sun, the Endangered Species Act is alive and well. The proposed minor changes in the implementing regulations will not threaten the existence of the act or make it “toothless,” nor will they result in the “extinction of countless species.””
From Mr. Tom O’Farrell perspective I am in general agreement with his entire comment. That said, if the Endangered Species Act was limited to its origional Congressional intent I personally would be far less inclined to complain about its disasterious effect on personal property rights in the United States. But, on the other hand I do not see any clause in the Constitution that gives the US Congress the authority to write into law, laws such as the Endangered Species Act; in fact since the law wrongly takes away personal property rights, this law is a violation of the Constitutions Bill of Rights as it relates to the taking of personal property.
For the rest of my larger argument, some might call it a rant, please see my posts on this same subject from two days ago.
http://www.lasvegassun.com/news/2008/aug...
95% of all species that every existed on Earth are extinct. Why do we think we are in charge of nature. We keep interfering with nature as each cause of "Saving something" comes up when in fact it is a very natural part of the Earth to take them and make new ones. We are not in charge. Just enjoy your time here and quit playing God.