Sun editorial:
Crisis news gets worse
Report about hepatitis outbreak cites more evidence against Endoscopy Center
Thu, Apr 3, 2008 (2:06 a.m.)
An interim report released by health inspectors contains more stomach-turning allegations against the Endoscopy Center of Southern Nevada.
In addition to the reuse of syringes as well as vials of anesthesia clearly labeled for one use only practices all but confirmed as having caused the hepatitis outbreak announced in February the report cites evidence of other unsanitary practices.
Reviews of records and interviews with former staff members of the now-closed center suggest that biopsy forceps also labeled for use on a single patient were reused.
Additionally, devices called bite blocks, which are placed in a patient’s mouth during upper endoscopies, were reused, according to evidence cited in the report.
The report was authored by the Outbreak Investigation Team of the Southern Nevada Health District. The team is continuing to work on a complete report of the Endoscopy Center’s role in the hepatitis crisis.
Hampering the work, however, are incomplete, confusing or misleading records kept by the center. This is preventing investigators from establishing a definitive sequence of events on key days.
For example, on Sept. 21 the day when five patients are suspected of being exposed to hepatitis C at the center the report says records show that “on four separate occasions an individual doctor was performing two procedures at the same time.”
Interviews with former employees provided more insight. One told investigators that only four bite blocks were allowed “per day per procedure room despite the number of procedures performed.” Another told of quitting after one day of work, after complaining to no avail about equipment reuse and inaccurate record-keeping.
Las Vegas Sun reporter Marshall Allen asked a prominent local gastroenterologist, Dr. Frank Nemec, about his reaction to the interim report. Nemec said he was “totally disgusted.”
We certainly agree. Forty-thousand former patients of the center were advised to get their blood tested after February’s announcement, and people’s faith in health care has been compromised. What must come out of this are strong new regulations and a commitment by the state to hire enough qualified health inspectors to enforce them.
Discussion: 1 comment so far…
Post a comment
Email Edition
- Most Read
- Discussed
- Most E-mailed
- Fourth fireworks light up valley sky
- Ensign’s pal lacked usual qualifications for job as senator’s senior aide
- Jay-Z lights up Las Vegas, lives life to the max
- Cousins attracting attention from college football recruiters
- Strip performer is eBay high bidder for Elvis ring
- Las Vegas to sizzle for the Fourth
- Swarm of crickets descends once again on Northern Nevada
- Local conservative radio talk reflects right’s downcast state
- Henderson house fire displaces family of three
- Day 2 of the World Series of Poker main event
Blogs
Elsewhere
Goalie chooses Mudbugs over Wranglers
The Bull's-Eye
Real drama follows Desert Classic victory by 'The Power' (UPDATED)
Elsewhere
Spike TV's 'UFC's Ultimate 100: Greatest Fights' airs tonight
The Kats Report
LV Phil 'Spectacular' at Springs Preserve was great -- for the music
Punchy Points: UFC 100
No. 6: The Ref: Dean relishes role, making right calls (1 Comment)
The Bull's-Eye
Canadian is first in Desert Classic's final four, Barney joins him (UPDATED) (2 Comments)
Sports: Upon Further Review
July 4 at Wimbledon
Calendar
- Blues Monday at the House of Blues (9 p.m. to 11 p.m.)
- Industry Night at XS (10 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.)
- The Automatic Tour at The Square Apple (5 p.m. to 9:30 p.m.)
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.
Technorati
What makes the whole matter worse, is I am a former patient of Dr.Frank Farris of the Gastroenterology Center of Nevada, and no one has ever contacted me.
I had a procedure done at that clinic but because it was not done by an "owner" doctor, I guess it doesn't count? What about all the outside doctors that rented the clinic to do procedures on their own patients? Have they been contacted? My records are in storage. Has anyone checked those records? I really don't think this investigation is being done very thoroughly
Someone needs to check the outside doctor's records; along with the clinics.