Sun editorial:
Crisis news gets worse
Report about hepatitis outbreak cites more evidence against Endoscopy Center
Thursday, April 3, 2008 | 2:06 a.m.
An interim report released by health inspectors contains more stomach-turning allegations against the Endoscopy Center of Southern Nevada.
In addition to the reuse of syringes as well as vials of anesthesia clearly labeled for one use only practices all but confirmed as having caused the hepatitis outbreak announced in February the report cites evidence of other unsanitary practices.
Reviews of records and interviews with former staff members of the now-closed center suggest that biopsy forceps also labeled for use on a single patient were reused.
Additionally, devices called bite blocks, which are placed in a patient’s mouth during upper endoscopies, were reused, according to evidence cited in the report.
The report was authored by the Outbreak Investigation Team of the Southern Nevada Health District. The team is continuing to work on a complete report of the Endoscopy Center’s role in the hepatitis crisis.
Hampering the work, however, are incomplete, confusing or misleading records kept by the center. This is preventing investigators from establishing a definitive sequence of events on key days.
For example, on Sept. 21 the day when five patients are suspected of being exposed to hepatitis C at the center the report says records show that “on four separate occasions an individual doctor was performing two procedures at the same time.”
Interviews with former employees provided more insight. One told investigators that only four bite blocks were allowed “per day per procedure room despite the number of procedures performed.” Another told of quitting after one day of work, after complaining to no avail about equipment reuse and inaccurate record-keeping.
Las Vegas Sun reporter Marshall Allen asked a prominent local gastroenterologist, Dr. Frank Nemec, about his reaction to the interim report. Nemec said he was “totally disgusted.”
We certainly agree. Forty-thousand former patients of the center were advised to get their blood tested after February’s announcement, and people’s faith in health care has been compromised. What must come out of this are strong new regulations and a commitment by the state to hire enough qualified health inspectors to enforce them.
Discussion: 1 comment so far…
Post a comment
- Most Read
- Discussed
- Most E-mailed
- Ensign moves out of home on C Street
- Cada and Moon emerge as Main Event’s final two
- Fight snapshot: Reviewing “24/7 Pacquiao/Cotto,” episode 3
- Life in the Limelight: Wayne Newton
- Cities, county find buying valley homes isn’t easy
- Motorcyclist dies in Summerlin crash
- UNLV wins hoops scrimmage at Long Beach State
- Six people share their stories of what led them to jobs at CityCenter
- Fedor Emelianenko TKOs Brett Rogers in second round
- Two injured in shooting in central valley
Blogs
Elsewhere
Findlay Prep's Bradley fitting in at Texas
Now and Then
I went to a hockey game and a New Mexico women's soccer match broke out
Politics: The Early Line
Attention in D.C. focuses on health care proposals
Elsewhere
Fedor v. Rogers delivers solid ratings on CBS (4 Comments)
Bloggity, Bloggity, Bloggity
If you can rebuild the whole car, then why not allow an engine change? (1 Comment)
Sports: Upon Further Review
Fight snapshot: Pacquiao is a hit with Jimmy Kimmel, and vice versa (2 Comments)
The Greene Room
MWC Winners and Losers: Week 10
Calendar »
- 9 Mon
- 10 Tue
- 11 Wed
- 12 Thu
- 13 Fri
-
Jo Dee Messina at the House of Blues
House of Blues | 7 p.m. to 10 p.m.
-
The Revival Tour at Beauty Bar
Beauty Bar | 9 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.
-
DJ Tina T at Prive
Prive | 10 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.
-
The Automatic Tour at The Square Apple
The Square Apple
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.
Technorati









What makes the whole matter worse, is I am a former patient of Dr.Frank Farris of the Gastroenterology Center of Nevada, and no one has ever contacted me.
I had a procedure done at that clinic but because it was not done by an "owner" doctor, I guess it doesn't count? What about all the outside doctors that rented the clinic to do procedures on their own patients? Have they been contacted? My records are in storage. Has anyone checked those records? I really don't think this investigation is being done very thoroughly
Someone needs to check the outside doctor's records; along with the clinics.