I’d given up on Gonzales leaving, Bogden says
Monday, Aug. 27, 2007 | 10 p.m.
WASHINGTON -- Former U.S. Attorney Daniel Bogden climbed out of bed at 5 a.m. Monday for his morning run, clicked on the TV news and saw the improbable.
Attorney General Alberto Gonzales had resigned. Like many Washington observers, Bogden said, he had “kind of accepted the fact that Gonzales was going to ride out” the political storm.
Bogden flipped through the channels quickly at his Reno home. Every station was breaking the story. He clicked to MSNBC and saw his own face staring back at him, with good reason. Bogden was one of the prosecutors purged by the Bush administration, apparently ending a long career with the Justice Department.
As the news of the resignation sank in, Bogden reflected on the eight months since he learned of his firing. He offered a few details he had refused to share while Gonzales remained in the job.
Bogden said Gonzales had called at least three times in the spring offering support. And three times, Bogden said, he asked for his job back.
He didn't get it.
As the months rolled past, Bogden said, he finally understood that the decision wouldn't be reversed. He also came to an unexpected conclusion. After 24 years as a prosecutor, most of them for Justice, he no longer wanted to work at the department.
Since Bogden's departure, former Justice officials have admitted using political litmus tests in hiring. They have described an attempt to persuade a heavily sedated Attorney General John Ashcroft to sign off on a controversial wiretapping program. They have given contradictory explanations for firing Bogden and the other prosecutors.
Eventually, Bogden realized that “I didn't want to work under the leadership.”
Gonzales' departure is good for the department, Bogden said. It may help to repair the institution. “The public has lost confidence in the attorney general. When you lose that, it's time for someone else to take over.”
President Bush doesn't share that view. At 7:50 a.m., Bogden watched as Bush, in Waco, Texas, said how sad it is that a talented public servant was kept from doing his job because his name was dragged through the mud for political reasons.
Bush talked about how unfairly Gonzales was portrayed, and Bogden said he thought that the same could be said for the dismissed prosecutors. As Congress sought an explanation for the firings, Justice officials said the attorneys had not been performing well.
Bogden and others responded by producing glowing performance appraisals.
Monday, as Bush defended Gonzales, “The president didn't come forward and talk about our sullied names and reputations.”
Bogden added that he is no closer to understand why he was turned out. He would like to know what he did to earn the attention of those who Democrats think wanted to stack the offices with “loyal Bushies,” as one uncovered e-mail put it.
Maybe Bogden's office was handling cases that displeased his bosses in the Republican administration -- indicting a politically connected Reno doctor, investigating a Republican congressman's fundraising, raiding the home of a businessman close to the Republican congressman running for governor, among others.
Or maybe it was what his office wasn't doing -- pursuing voter fraud cases that were a Bush administration priority.
The White House has yet to appoint Bogden's replacement. Nevada Republican Sen. John Ensign has given the White House names of three candidates.
Would Bogden go back now that Gonzales is gone?
“It's not my call. It's President Bush's call.”
As for the future, Bogden will have a small place in history as one of the U.S. attorneys whose firing led to the downfall of an attorney general. He doesn't care for the rep.
“I thought I'd be remembered by the accomplishments our office would achieve, be known for hard work and dedication.”
So in the end, what did the Bush administration gain by the firings?
“Not much was accomplished,” he said. “I think a lot of harm was done.”
Lisa Mascaro can be reached at (202) 662-7436 or at lisa.mascaro@lasvegassun.com.
- Most Read
- Discussed
- Most E-mailed
- Corrections officer with Metro killed in U.S. 95 crash
- System fails to catch contractor’s family tie with county
- Fontainebleau contractors say sales process is flawed
- Where to watch UFC 106
- UNLV and Southern Illinois will be guarded tonight
- Findlay guard Joseph scores 33, talks about UNLV
- The pull of a drug, a push to the brink
- Bishop Gorman takes Sunset Region title in win over Cimarron
- Fighters make weight, Dana White talks Rampage/Rashad
- Reid clears major health care hurdle, daunting weeks ahead
Blogs
The Kats Report
For props, Lewis Black needs only his manic delivery and torrid material (6 Comments)
Elsewhere
Sands China raises $2.5 billion in Hong Kong IPO (1 Comment)
Marquardt v. Sonnen scheduled for UFC 109
Bloggity, Bloggity, Bloggity
Will a fourth consecutive title by Jimmie Johnson be good or bad for NASCAR? (4 Comments)
Top Chef: Las Vegas
The Jet Stream: And then there were four
Top Chef Episode 12: On keeping it simple
Miech Again
Chilly start for Chace, but Stanback says he'll warm up (2 Comments)
- Live chat
- Tuesday, noon PST
- Chat with Krista Creelman
- Problem Gambling Center executive director Krista Creelman will answer questions about gambling addiction from Las Vegas Sun readers from noon to 1 p.m. Tuesday, Nov. ... Submit question
Calendar »
- 22 Sun
- 23 Mon
- 24 Tue
- 25 Wed
- 26 Thu
-
The Four Tops at The Orleans Showroom
Orleans Hotel-Casino
-
The Chase at Downtown Cocktail Room
Downtown Cocktail Room | 10 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.
-
Lady Gaga album release party at Revolution Lounge
Beatles Revolution Lounge | 10 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.
-
Food drive at Christian Audigier
Christian Audigier The Nightclub | 10 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.
-
Above & Beyond at Moon
Moon Nightclub | 10 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.
Technorati













Post a comment
Commenting requires registration.
Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Full comments policy.