Editorial: Tribunals questioned
Saturday, July 15, 2006 | 7:48 a.m.
Less than a month after the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that Geneva Conventions protections apply to terrorism suspects detained by the United States, confusion abounds in Congress and the White House about how that applies to military tribunals.
According to a story by The Washington Post on Thursday, some House Republicans said this week that Congress should "just ratify" the special military commission trials set up by the Defense Department, as President Bush and Defense officials favored before the Supreme Court's ruling.
Many key members of the Senate, meanwhile, have embraced a more literal - and, we think, more correct - interpretation of the ruling and called for following the standards set forth by the Geneva Conventions.
Unfortunately, the Bush administration's stance on the issue has not been clear. Consider that House Republicans said Wednesday that the administration supported their view on establishing military commission trials, but on that same day Sen. John McCain, an Arizona Republican and former prisoner of war, said White House officials had told him that the administration favored the Senate's position.
Meanwhile, Bush administration officials told the Post on Wednesday that the court didn't find any actual problems with the tribunals, but simply wanted the rules passed by Congress.
Such doublespeak and lack of leadership aren't acceptable. The Geneva Conventions, which prohibit "outrages upon personal dignity, in particular humiliating and degrading treatment," are what we expect to be extended to U.S. soldiers who are captured. We should abide by them as well. Doing so does not suggest, as Republican hard-liners in the House claim, that the United States is soft on terrorists. It shows that our nation values fairness and humanity.
Congress needs to stop wasting time with inflammatory rhetoric and establish rules that are clear, humane and fair. And it needs to do so soon. Waiting until next year to figure out how the United States is going to treat those its military detains is irresponsible.
archive
- Most Read
- Discussed
- Most E-mailed
- Shooting in parking lot of CVS leaves man dead
- Man, 26, dies in collision with truck traveling at 100 mph
- Holiday shoppers skip turkey for Strip stores
- Casino venue in Singapore will have Las Vegas flavor
- Nevada’s just not for us, many top high schoolers say
- Fontainebleau retail component seeks bankruptcy
- CityCenter completion might spur home foreclosures
- MGM Mirage: CityCenter not affected by debt woes
- Holiday Auction 2009 items
- Real estate experts cautiously optimistic about market
Blogs
The Kats Report
Could a savior of shuttered Las Vegas Art Museum be ... Peter Max? (4 Comments)
For Paul Stanley and KISS, rock and roll is not over (4 Comments)
Twenty years ago today, Human Nature took root on the farm (1 Comment)
Robin Leach's Las Vegas Celebrity Watch
Photo Gallery: Donny Osmond’s triumphant return to the Flamingo
The Kats Report
'DWTS' champ Donny Osmond still deft afoot in return to Flamingo (8 Comments)
Politics: The Early Line
Meeting of GOP governors draws challengers, not Gibbons (5 Comments)
Politics: Ralston's Flash
Oscar loves forcing developers to sign labor peace agreements, Culinary loves the city's downtown plans and all is forgiven (10 Comments)
Calendar »
- 28 Sat
- 29 Sun
- 30 Mon
- 1 Tue
- 2 Wed
-
KISS at the Pearl
The Pearl at the Palms
-
Joe Perry Project at the House of Blues
House of Blues | 8 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.
-
Stevie Wonder at MGM Grand
MGM Grand Garden Arena | 8 p.m. to 11 p.m.
-
Vicente Fernandez at the Mandalay Bay Events Center
Mandalay Bay Events Center | 9 p.m. to 11 p.m.
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.
Technorati










