Letter: America comes before liberal media’s grudge

Wednesday, July 5, 2006 | 7:19 a.m.

It should come as no surprise to regular readers of the Las Vegas Sun that its editorial page writers have managed to fully assume the mantle of the anti-war, anti-Bush and anti-America crowd with the inking of the June 30 editorial, "High court humbles Bush."

Many of the typical liberal fringe talking points make an appearance. However, I am a bit disappointed by the absence of "Bush lied - people died." The subheading contends that the recent court ruling clarifies that the president is not all-powerful during wartime. Apparently, the Sun would prefer a president have no power whatsoever (unless it is a Democratic president), and that the Fourth Estate should be the all-powerful entity, making critical decisions about the defense of our country.

Your lead editorial takes President Bush to task for "habitually" scolding the press for disclosing classified information. However, if the press were not "habitually" publishing military secrets in time of war, there would be no need for rebuke. Additionally, if the commander in chief "considers" information classified, then it is classified, as he is the supreme classification authority. Exposing secret information is a far cry from challenging the classification itself through appropriate channels.

I will admit that the press has the right and, arguably, the responsibility to report information they obtain if they feel the "people's right to know" will be served. But, does it transcend the people's right to live, in an era of extreme danger from Islamic extremists? Ignoring the liability of the media, there should be no confusion about the necessity to bring those who provided the information to the New York Times before the courts and prosecute for treason, which during time of war should include the death penalty.

Gary Conary, North Las Vegas