Editorial: Banning brutal interrogations
Monday, Dec. 19, 2005 | 8:44 a.m.
Bush administration's long-overdue acceptance of a ban on torture comes with compromise and guarded relief
President Bush's acceptance of Sen. John McCain's amendment to ban torture of foreign terrorist suspects should be viewed with measured relief.
Certainly, we are glad that America's image may slowly be cleansed of the stain left by reports of harsh treatment of prisoners at the U.S.-operated Abu Ghraib facility in Iraq and the U.S. detention center at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. It is difficult to promote America's values and democracy as the high road when widespread reports say the U.S. leadership regularly ignores international rules banning cruel treatment of foreign detainees and performs these deeds in secret overseas prisons.
But even though the Senate and House already had approved McCain's proposal, which is an amendment to the overall defense spending bill, McCain appeased Bush and a handful of Republican critics Thursday by adding a compromise. It allows CIA agents and other civilian interrogators who are accused of breaking the ban the right to claim they had a reasonable belief that they were obeying a legal order -- a defense currently extended only to members of the U.S. military.
And we shouldn't forget that last week's about-face came from the same Bush administration that sidestepped the rules to begin with. After the Sept. 11 attacks, administration lawyers legalized the cruel treatment of war detainees with memos declaring that the United Nations Convention Against Torture treaty, which bars torture, applies only on domestic soil.
The fact is, McCain didn't really need Bush's approval. The Arizona Republican -- a former Navy pilot who was detained and tortured in a North Vietnamese prison camp for more than five years -- had enough votes in both the House and Senate to override the veto Bush had threatened to issue if the defense bill included McCain's amendment. The Senate had passed McCain's amendment 90 to 9 in October, and the House supported it with a nonbinding resolution 308 to 122 on Wednesday.
With his own public approval ratings in the pits and public support for the war in Iraq fading, Bush had nothing to gain with a veto. It wouldn't exactly improve the score at home or abroad. The recent U.S. policy on brutal interrogation techniques has always been a no-win proposition. But the Bush administration hasn't been adept at recognizing that.
archive
- Most Read
- Discussed
- Most E-mailed
- Trainers scuffle at Manny Pacquiao, Miguel Cotto weigh-in
- Hooters reports loss, says Chapter 11 possible
- Live Blog: Pacquiao wins by TKO in round twelve
- Clubs want to be ‘good citizen,’ so stripper-mobile ends its run
- Police seek man who stole $2,000 worth of clothing
- Las Vegas club agrees to halt promotion featuring live dancers on truck
- Nuclear plant in Ely could complicate radioactive waste, water issues
- Manny Pacquiao says he feels stronger than ever
- Las Vegas Hilton reports wider loss in quarter
- Now we can all see Islamic extremism for what it truly is
Blogs
The Kats Report
New face of Monte Carlo includes all the faces of Caliendo
The Greene Room
Predicting this weekend's Mountain West football slate (1 Comment)
Top Chef: Las Vegas
Top Chef Episode 11: Child's play
Miech Again
UNLV prez Smatresk is ready for some basketball (9 Comments)
Politics: The Early Line
Harry Reid's fourth TV ad begins running today
The Greene Room
Chad Ochocinco vs. Anderson Silva? That would be a sight ... (5 Comments)
Top Chef: Las Vegas
The Jet Stream: The three stages of chefdom
Calendar »
- 15 Sun
- 16 Mon
- 17 Tue
- 18 Wed
- 19 Thu
-
Actor's Expo at Rave Motion Pictures
Rave Motion Pictures Town Square 18 | 3 p.m. to 5 p.m.
-
Lily Tomlin at the Hollywood Theatre
Hollywood Theatre at MGM Grand
-
Neil Sedaka at the Orleans
Orleans Hotel-Casino
-
Supernatural Santana – A Trip Through the Hits at The Joint
The Joint
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.
Technorati





