Las Vegas Sun

November 15, 2009

Currently: 49° | Complete forecast | Log in

Schools weigh total ban on tobacco use

Monday, May 10, 2004 | 11 a.m.

Clark County School District officials want to ban the use of tobacco products on campuses, in facilities and even by employees while driving school vehicles.

The district currently prohibits employees from smoking except in designated areas. Students are not allowed to smoke even if they meet the state's minimum age of 18.

The new regulation would ban use of all tobacco products -- including chewing tobacco -- on all properties as well as at district-sponsored events. To be adopted by the district, any change in regulations must be approved by the Clark County School Board in two separate votes. The first vote on the matter is slated for Thursday.

"We must have absolute consistency in our message if we expect our students to listen when we tell them tobacco is a killer," said School Board member Denise Brodsky. "Children model themselves after adults, and children who see smoking as typical adult behavior are more likely to become smokers themselves."

The ban would mean that parents watching a sporting event or an after-school theater production couldn't take a smoke break on campus. It also means that teachers and other employees couldn't smoke during a break unless they left campus.

If approved, the ban would mean a healthier environment for students and staff, said Brodsky, past executive director of the Nevada Tobacco Prevention Coalition.

"We'll be limiting secondhand smoke exposure and hopefully encouraging our employees to quit," Brodsky said.

Stephen Augspurger, executive director of the Clark County School Administrators Association, said he had heard no complaints from his union's membership about the proposed ban.

"Even with designated areas, the school is one building with one air system that circulates the smoke," Augspurger said. "I can understand why that would be a problem for some people."

Lawmakers during the last legislative session approved giving local school districts the authority to set such bans. Other local agencies, including those at the county and city level, are still prohibited from passing tobacco regulations stricter than those set by the state.

An amendment that sought to allow local governments to ban smoking in public buildings, public waiting areas of medical facilities and in public elevators, died in a legislative committee.

On an advisory ballot question in 2002, two-thirds of voters in both Clark and Washoe counties said they favored banning smoking in public settings such as restaurants, convenience stores and schools. On the same ballot, 57 percent of those counties' voters said local agencies should have more say in setting limits on smoking in public places.

Joe Furtado, president of the district's support employees' union, said he planned to discuss the proposed ban with his executive board and decide whether they believed the district was overstepping its bounds.

"I'm sure they (the district) look at it as a health issue but tobacco isn't illegal in this state," Furtado said. "Banning it on campuses I can understand, but the rest may be going too far."

California's Legislature prohibited tobacco products at public schools in the mid-1990s. The federal Centers for Disease Control and Prevention is in the midst of a major campaign urging local school districts to ban all tobacco products on all property and at school-sponsored events. Districts have signed on many states, including Colorado, North Carolina and Oklahoma.

"We're starting to catch up to the other states," said Maria Azarelli, senior educator for the Clark County Health District. "A comprehensive community tobacco control plan has to cover the workplace and that includes schools. It's the only way you're going to see people's behavior change in the long run."

  • Most Read
  • Discussed
  • Most E-mailed

Calendar »

  • 15 Sun
  • 16 Mon
  • 17 Tue
  • 18 Wed
  • 19 Thu