Editorial: Reagan’s legacy surely will endure
Tuesday, June 8, 2004 | 9:56 a.m.
President Ronald Reagan's conservatism -- especially his belief that government is the problem, not the solution -- provoked strong passions among both Democrats and Republicans during the 1980s. Not many Americans were passive when it came to Reagan's often polarizing ideas, including his hawkish foreign policy. Still, Reagan's boundless optimism and belief that America's greatest days were just ahead earned him the public's admiration and disarmed many of his critics.
Ultimately, if it hadn't been for the success of the Reagan Revolution, it's hard to imagine conservative Republicans subsequently getting elected governor in states that were solidly Democratic or Republicans capturing control of the House of Representatives in 1994. The popular two-term president, who died over the weekend, was one of the most important figures of the 20th century, transforming American politics. Indeed, Reagan's standing as a leader in the modern-era Republican Party rivals that of Franklin Roosevelt's role in establishing the Democratic Party's dominance in American politics from the New Deal through the 1960s.
In the area of foreign policy, Reagan's greatest achievement was his resoluteness in standing up to, and working to end, the spread of communism engineered by the Soviet Union. The ultimate breakup of the Soviet Union was accelerated by the president's willingness to engage it in an arms race, which helped bankrupt an already unstable, state-run Soviet economy. There were some missteps in foreign affairs, though, most notably the Iran-Contra scandal. But Reagan's resolve in fighting communism -- something he had in common with Democrat Harry Truman and which helped him politically, earning him the votes of conservative Democrats -- endeared him to tens of millions of people living in those former totalitarian countries in Eastern Europe.
The sharpest break from his predecessors in the Oval Office -- including Democrats and Republicans -- was in the area of economics. Reagan was an ardent believer in supply-side economics, a theory that holds that economic prosperity is tied to huge tax cuts. Congress did pass Reagan's tax-cut package in 1981, and the economy ultimately rebounded, setting the stage for his landslide re-election win in 1984. But while taxes were being cut, it was at the expense of true fiscal conservatism: The federal debt, even after some subsequent tax increases to try to stem the flow of red ink, nearly tripled during Reagan's administration. Reagan's Republican successor, George H.W. Bush, was forced to raise taxes, which made him a one-term president. Bush's successor, Democrat Bill Clinton, showed that economic prosperity can be gained in other ways, too, by raising ta xes and restraining government spending to seriously cut the deficit. Clinton's fiscal policies created an economic boom th! at lasted until George W. Bush took office in 2001.
While Reagan spoke about the need for sweeping cuts in government, he was a pragmatist and never really fought to slash government spending, something that shouldn't be too surprising. Americans like to talk about less government, but when it gets right down to it, they want Social Security to be there for them and their children when they retire, they want Medicare to be there for them when they're sick and elderly, they want decent funding for education to make sure that our nation's children have the same opportunities that they did, they want a strong military to make sure that we're protected and they want people who pose a threat to society to be locked up. But all those essential programs at the federal, state and local level require money -- in the form of taxes.
Nevertheless, Reagan, with his ability to masterfully communicate his conservative ideas, changed the nature of the political debate in Washington and in statehouses all across the country. The burden, more and more, has fallen on Democrats to prove why more government spending is necessary -- even for programs as vital as public education and Social Security -- a sea change in American politics due largely to Reagan.
archive
- Most Read
- Discussed
- Most E-mailed
- Live Main Event blog: Cada and Moon set to square off heads-up
- Ensign moves out of home on C Street
- Cada and Moon emerge as Main Event’s final two
- Fight snapshot: Reviewing “24/7 Pacquiao/Cotto,” episode 3
- Cities, county find buying valley homes isn’t easy
- Life in the Limelight: Wayne Newton
- Temperature to hit 80 today in Las Vegas
- Everclear’s Art Alexakis finds Hard Rock Cafe feels like home
- UNLV wins hoops scrimmage at Long Beach State
- Six people share their stories of what led them to jobs at CityCenter
Blogs
Sports: Upon Further Review
Fight snapshot: Pacquiao is a hit with Jimmy Kimmel, and vice versa
The Greene Room
MWC Winners and Losers: Week 10
The Kats Report
Buchanan was one of the city's truly flamboyant characters
Sports: Upon Further Review
Fight snapshot: Reviewing "24/7 Pacquiao/Cotto," episode 3
The Kats Report
Life in the Limelight: Wayne Newton (4 Comments)
Politics: Ralston's Flash
An entire campaign in one mail piece for Harry Reid (5 Comments)
Miech Again
On the road to Long Beach, UNLV hoops style (13 Comments)
Calendar »
- 9 Mon
- 10 Tue
- 11 Wed
- 12 Thu
- 13 Fri
-
Jo Dee Messina at the House of Blues
House of Blues | 7 p.m. to 10 p.m.
-
The Revival Tour at Beauty Bar
Beauty Bar | 9 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.
-
DJ Tina T at Prive
Prive | 10 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.
-
The Automatic Tour at The Square Apple
The Square Apple
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.
Technorati










