Letter: Petition process unfairly amplifies smaller counties
Friday, Nov. 28, 2003 | 8:34 a.m.
Your recent editorial surprisingly defended an undemocratic initiative petition process that gives more power to one sparsely populated rural county than to populous Clark County with over two-thirds of Nevada's population.
For example, in 2000 I circulated an initiative petition that would have given the voters of Clark County the right to break up our oversized and poorly performing school district into smaller, more responsive community-based districts. Although we obtained enough signatures overall (most of them in Clark County), because we did not gather sufficient signatures in tiny Mineral County, the citizens of Clark County were denied the right to make changes in our own school district.
Whatever happened to the concept of one-man-one-vote?
The initiative petition procedure that currently gives one tiny county with a few hundred voters more power than populous Clark County is the last vestige of an unfair system that was declared unconstitutional decades ago. There was a time in Nevada when each county had one state senator irrespective of its population. The state assembly was also weighted in favor of the less populated counties to the detriment of Clark County.
However, in 1965, the U.S. District Court in Nevada, in the case of Dungan v. Sawyer, ruled that both houses of our Legislature must be apportioned on a strict population basis.
It is now time to conform our initiative petition process to the one-man-one-vote requirement applicable to legislative apportionment. That's why I have joined as a plaintiff to overturn the current initiative requirement that discriminates against the voters of Clark County.
The 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals has already ruled that a similar undemocratic initiative requirement in Idaho violates the equal protection clause of the U.S. Constitution. I am confident that the federal court will also overturn the discriminatory Nevada requirement.
SANDRA TIFFANY
Editor's note: Sandra Tiffany is a Republican state senator whose district includes Henderson.
archive
- Most Read
- Discussed
- Most E-mailed
- Scientology foe’s arrest raises issue of rights
- ‘Stripper-mobile’ with live dancers raises safety, decency concerns
- Miguel Cotto camp says big cut in June fight an asset now
- Cada cherishes moment as poker’s youngest champ
- Manny Pacquiao, Miguel Cotto arrive at MGM Grand
- $5.1 million later, life goes on for Darvin Moon
- Vegas resorts get new places on Monopoly game board
- Fight snapshot: Arum takes a pot shot during Pacquiao training
- Rebels old and new celebrate anniversary of 1990 title
- Live Main Event blog from the Rio
Blogs
Sports: Upon Further Review
Fight snapshot: Predictions for Pacquiao-Cotto
The Kats Report
A lesson in information dissemination, with a little Twitter and a lot of Agassi
Now and Then
Ichabods were tougher than they sound
Politics: Ralston's Flash
I shudder to think what the “amazing door prize from the governor” might be (3 Comments)
Pew Center report finds what others have: Nevada's economy depressed, future in doubt (5 Comments)
Elsewhere
Kelly Pavlik to fight in hometown on Dec. 19
Lobos soccer and Lambert continue to draw attention
Calendar »
- 11 Wed
- 12 Thu
- 13 Fri
- 14 Sat
- 15 Sun
-
Foreigner at Star of the Desert Arena
Star of the Desert Arena
-
Days of the New at Wasted Space
Wasted Space | 10 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.
-
DJ Boris at Godskitchen
Body English | 10:30 p.m. to 11:30 p.m.
-
Holding on to Sound at Beauty Bar
Beauty Bar | 10 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.
-
Rockabilly Wednesay at Revolution Lounge
Beatles Revolution Lounge | 10 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.
Technorati












