Editorial: Yes, Virginia, there really is a taxman

Wednesday, Jan. 29, 2003 | 9:06 a.m.

The need for new and higher taxes in Nevada has rekindled a superficially valid argument from people who declare themselves to be essentially self-sufficient. A significant number of people who have no children enrolled in public schools ask why their taxes should increase to cover rising education costs. Many people who live in neighborhoods ruled by homeowners' associations, where hefty private dues are paid to provide security, landscaping, road repairs, clubhouses and other amenities, ask why they should support increased taxes for police protection, transportation and parks.

Looking back on our own childhoods, we're happy that these questions didn't gain a following among the adults at that time. As we see it, it's now our turn to care for the coming generations, just as we were cared for by the previous generations. We're guessing that those who do not have children in school are happy to receive correct change at stores, properly filled prescriptions, accurately figured interest payments and other services -- all provided by people educated in the public schools. And those who live in secluded neighborhoods must drive out for doctors' appointments, grocery shopping, entertainment and many other reasons. It's our guess that during those outings, they're very glad that policemen are on duty, that urban planning is in evidence and that kids are playing in parks and not loitering in the streets -- all amenities paid for with tax es.

If these are not enough reasons to feel good about sharing in the costs of community, here's another one: The time will come when all of us will need care and those providing it will be the little ones we now see each morning heading to school. We guess the cost of their education will not be an issue then.

archive