Audit recommends revival of medical screening panel
Thursday, Dec. 11, 2003 | 10:48 a.m.
CARSON CITY -- The medical-dental screening panel, which was abolished in the overhaul of Nevada's medical malpractice laws, should be revived, an audit by a national organization says.
The panel, which was composed of doctors and lawyers, reviewed malpractice claims before they went to trial to judge whether they had merit or were frivolous. Malpractice lawsuits had to be reviewed by the panel before going to trial.
A special session of the Legislature in 2002 eliminated the panel after there were complaints it took too long to review cases and was an impediment to quick settlements.
The Federation of State Medical Boards, in an audit of the Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners, says the Legislature should consider reestablishing the screening panel. But the audit said it should be "properly funded."
"Although there is a distinct difference between what constitutes a basis for a malpractice judgment and grounds for prosecutable disciplinary action, the medical-dental screening panel's findings were useful to the (examiners) board as a prescreening tool," it said.
The examiners board is responsible for disciplining errant physicians.
Sen. Ann O'Connell, R-Las Vegas, is among the appointees on a legislative subcommittee that is reviewing the audit. She said reestablishing the screening panel "is a good idea as long as we do it right." She said the previous panel had no way to enforce its findings.
Under the old system, if the screening panel found there was no malpractice, the patient could still sue.
O'Connell also said the membership on the panel was voluntary which made it difficult to fill the positions.
The federation said medical malpractice complaints submitted to the examiners board have "increased dramatically" since the screening panel was disbanded in October 2002. It suggested this can be partially attributable to a number of frivolous claims.
But the federation found there were often long delays between the filing of a case with the screening panel and its decision.
archive
- Most Read
- Discussed
- Most E-mailed
- Corrections officer with Metro killed in U.S. 95 crash
- The pull of a drug, a push to the brink
- Was there an ulterior motive in parking the stripper-mobile?
- Harry Reid’s hopes hitched to health care reform bill
- Reid clears major health care hurdle, daunting weeks ahead
- Notebook: The Shark and LJ circle
- CityCenter hotel welcomes new employees with gala
- Politicians waste no time spinning latest jobless numbers
- Forrest Griffin writes his own ending at UFC 106
- Willis makes big difference in UNLV’s 78-69 victory
Blogs
Culture and Entertainment
UFC 106 walk-in music: Griffin changes his tune, secures win over Ortiz
The Kats Report
For props, Lewis Black needs only his manic delivery and torrid material (9 Comments)
Elsewhere
Sands China raises $2.5 billion in Hong Kong IPO (2 Comments)
Marquardt v. Sonnen scheduled for UFC 109
Bloggity, Bloggity, Bloggity
Will a fourth consecutive title by Jimmie Johnson be good or bad for NASCAR? (4 Comments)
Top Chef: Las Vegas
The Jet Stream: And then there were four
Top Chef Episode 12: On keeping it simple
- Live chat
- Tuesday, noon PST
- Chat with Krista Creelman
- Problem Gambling Center executive director Krista Creelman will answer questions about gambling addiction from Las Vegas Sun readers from noon to 1 p.m. Tuesday, Nov. ... Submit question
Calendar »
- 23 Mon
- 24 Tue
- 25 Wed
- 26 Thu
- 27 Fri
-
The Automatic Tour at The Square Apple
The Square Apple
-
Football specials at Diablo's
Diablos Cantina
-
Rhumbar presents Pink Sugar Mondays
The Mirage Hotel and Casino
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.
Technorati











