Agency cites LV eminent domain case
Monday, March 4, 2002 | 9:50 a.m.
WASHINGTON -- A Las Vegas eminent domain case made a top 10 list of the nation's most egregious examples of a government agency unfairly ousting people from their homes or businesses to make way for another private development, a nonprofit group said today.
The case involves a long-running dispute between the Pappas family of Las Vegas and the Las Vegas Downtown Redevelopment Agency. The agency seized 7,000 square feet of downtown commercial property from the family in 1993 to clear space for the Fremont Street Experience parking garage.
Lawyers at the Washington-based Institute for Justice, a private group that helps small businesses, churches and families fight eminent domain cases, said the Pappas case ranked among the worst abuses, because the city agency seized and razed the property quickly without giving the family due process.
"We felt the case really showed abuse of power to help political favorites," Dana Berliner, the institute's senior attorney, said. "Sadly, these 10 cases are just the tip of the iceberg."
Institute lawyers released their list today at the National Press Club. They announced a new initiative called the Castle Coalition, a nationwide network of activists and property owners united to fight eminent domain abuses. The institute has compiled more than 100 examples of governments that inappropriately took private property since 1998.
Government agencies of all sizes and types have power of eminent domain to take private property if the property is needed for public use projects. But governments increasingly are misinterpreting their power and taking homes and small businesses to hand them over to other larger, private interests such as large corporations, the group says. Governments will argue that a corporation -- or a parking lot -- will benefit the public.
The Pappas case caught the attention of the institute in part because District Court Judge Don Chairez in 1996 ruled that the Las Vegas agency did not have the power of eminent domain, and the case may be headed for the Nevada Supreme Court. A $4.5 million settlement with the city fell through in 2000.
archive
- Most Read
- Discussed
- Most E-mailed
- Corrections officer with Metro killed in U.S. 95 crash
- The pull of a drug, a push to the brink
- Was there an ulterior motive in parking the stripper-mobile?
- Reid clears major health care hurdle, daunting weeks ahead
- Harry Reid’s hopes hitched to health care reform bill
- Notebook: The Shark and LJ circle
- CityCenter hotel welcomes new employees with gala
- Politicians waste no time spinning latest jobless numbers
- Willis makes big difference in UNLV’s 78-69 victory
- Forrest Griffin writes his own ending at UFC 106
Blogs
Culture and Entertainment
UFC 106 walk-in music: Griffin changes his tune, secures win over Ortiz
The Kats Report
For props, Lewis Black needs only his manic delivery and torrid material (7 Comments)
Elsewhere
Sands China raises $2.5 billion in Hong Kong IPO (2 Comments)
Marquardt v. Sonnen scheduled for UFC 109
Bloggity, Bloggity, Bloggity
Will a fourth consecutive title by Jimmie Johnson be good or bad for NASCAR? (4 Comments)
Top Chef: Las Vegas
The Jet Stream: And then there were four
Top Chef Episode 12: On keeping it simple
- Live chat
- Tuesday, noon PST
- Chat with Krista Creelman
- Problem Gambling Center executive director Krista Creelman will answer questions about gambling addiction from Las Vegas Sun readers from noon to 1 p.m. Tuesday, Nov. ... Submit question
Calendar »
- 23 Mon
- 24 Tue
- 25 Wed
- 26 Thu
- 27 Fri
-
The Automatic Tour at The Square Apple
The Square Apple
-
Football specials at Diablo's
Diablos Cantina
-
Rhumbar presents Pink Sugar Mondays
The Mirage Hotel and Casino
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.
Technorati














