Editorial: TV cameras not suitable for jurors
Monday, Dec. 2, 2002 | 8:43 a.m.
Subjecting a jury to experimental filming when a man's life is at stake would be a new low for America's courtrooms. It's already troubling that certain cases are selected for gavel-to-gavel televised coverage more for their entertainment value than for anything to do with educating the viewer. Out of the thousands of criminal cases tried every year, only a few are televised and their common thread is sex, celebrity, or ghoulish details. Now a crew from the public TV show "Frontline" is seeking permission to film jury deliberations in a Texas murder case. The defendant is 17 and faces the death penalty for an alleged carjacking in which a person was killed.
A news story in the Los Angeles Times described the filming request as an "unprecedented courtroom experiment." It became a news story because a state district judge in Houston decided to grant the film crew's request. The judge's decision is being appealed, as it should be. The request should be denied, if for no other reason, because potential jurors would be excused if they didn't want to be filmed. Should we dismiss otherwise perfectly capable jurors just because they don't want to be part of a nationally televised experiment?
There are many other reasons, of course, for jury deliberations to remain private. Many jurors who would support a guilty finding might hold back, fearing retribution by the defendant's family. It's also possible that a juror who would otherwise speak up for the defendant might fear a backlash from the public. Then there would be the grandstanders and people contemplating book deals. Justice is sacred and should not be drawn in to the reality TV genre that is proving so popular. Although "Frontline" is planning to air the segment after the trial and verdict, the next step would be "real time" filming. Do we really want to exchange justice for entertainment?
archive
- Most Read
- Discussed
- Most E-mailed
- CityCenter unveils Crystals high-end retail district
- Sarah Palin wasn’t a disaster, but Obama is
- Freeze warning issued for LV
- Fontainebleau lenders sue construction companies over liens
- CityCenter’s Mandarin Oriental makes Vegas debut
- Limo drivers’ suit over wages gets class action status
- Kruger may soon seek more disciplined shot selection
- AG says any Station Casinos trustee must be licensed by regulators
- Kimbo Slice not enjoying cutting weight for first time
- As national jobless rate improves, LV sees signs of trouble
Blogs
Politics: Ralston's Flash
Superintendents want state to immediately seek Race to Top funds
Top Chef: Las Vegas
The great Jennifer debate (1 Comment)
The Kats Report
From Eva Longoria Parker to a cluster of execs, crowd takes a shine to Crystals (2 Comments)
Elsewhere
Harry Reid's recipe for getting health-care deal done (8 Comments)
UNLV in at No. 11 in SI's college hoops power rankings (3 Comments)
Top Chef: Las Vegas
Top Chef Episode 13: A few good chefs
Gray Matter
Fight weekend in Las Vegas and Thanksgiving (3 Comments)
Calendar »
- 5 Sat
- 6 Sun
- 7 Mon
- 8 Tue
- 9 Wed
-
The Ultimate Fighter 10 Finale at the Pearl
The Pearl at the Palms | 4 p.m. to 10 p.m.
-
Willie Nelson at Planet Hollywood Theatre for the Performing Arts
Planet Hollywood Resort and Casino | 9 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.
-
Cash'd Out at Aliante Station
Aliante Station Casino and Hotel | 9 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.
-
Brooks & Dunn at the Hilton
Las Vegas Hilton
-
Ron White performs at the Mirage
Terry Fator Theatre
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.
Technorati











