Editorial: No tears for judges over pay
Wednesday, March 21, 2001 | 9:16 a.m.
Nevada Supreme Court Justice Bob Rose isn't happy that some of his fellow justices receive a bigger paycheck. Currently justices on the Supreme Court can make up to $107,000 a year, but Chief Justice Bill Maupin makes $22,000 more annually than Rose, which Rose deemed a "gross inequity." In fact, some justices of the peace make more than he does, Rose last week told a legislative panel that is considering legislation to raise judicial salaries. Despite Rose's displeasure, the Nevada Constitution -- for good reason -- bars pay increases before a term expires.
Certainly if this were the private sector, Rose would have an excellent argument to make, which is that two people doing the same job should be paid equally. But since Rose is an elected official, this is a much different matter. It has been a long-standing principle in government that elected officials shouldn't receive a pay increase until they face the voters again. There is no reason why judges or justices on the Supreme Court should be treated any differently than the governor, the Legislature or locally elected officials.
What's intriguing about Rose's complaint is that not only did he know when he was elected what the pay would be, but that he also understood that the Nevada Constitution prohibited pay increases during his term. It also should be mentioned that judges can supplement their base salaries with longevity pay: As the Sun's Cy Ryan noted in a story last week, judges also earn a 2 percent per year increase in salary after four years in office, an amount that is capped at 22 percent. And while up to six years might seem like a long time to wait, judges and justices have indicated they like the lengthier terms, insulating them from the political dervish that other elected officials must frequently face.
It also seems picayune for Rose to raise this beef in light of how much an independent commission is recommending that pay be raised. Salaries for Supreme Court justices would go from $107,000 to $150,000 while those in District Court would be hiked from $100,000 to $130,000. It would seem quite a small price to pay, waiting a few years to see a salary increased so handsomely.
archive
- Most Read
- Discussed
- Most E-mailed
- CityCenter unveils Crystals high-end retail district
- Sarah Palin wasn’t a disaster, but Obama is
- Freeze warning issued for LV
- Fontainebleau lenders sue construction companies over liens
- Limo drivers’ suit over wages gets class action status
- CityCenter’s Mandarin Oriental makes Vegas debut
- Kruger may soon seek more disciplined shot selection
- AG says any Station Casinos trustee must be licensed by regulators
- Kimbo Slice not enjoying cutting weight for first time
- As national jobless rate improves, LV sees signs of trouble
Blogs
Politics: Ralston's Flash
Superintendents want state to immediately seek Race to Top funds
Top Chef: Las Vegas
The great Jennifer debate (1 Comment)
The Kats Report
From Eva Longoria Parker to a cluster of execs, crowd takes a shine to Crystals (2 Comments)
Elsewhere
Harry Reid's recipe for getting health-care deal done (8 Comments)
UNLV in at No. 11 in SI's college hoops power rankings (3 Comments)
Top Chef: Las Vegas
Top Chef Episode 13: A few good chefs
Gray Matter
Fight weekend in Las Vegas and Thanksgiving (3 Comments)
Calendar »
- 5 Sat
- 6 Sun
- 7 Mon
- 8 Tue
- 9 Wed
-
The Ultimate Fighter 10 Finale at the Pearl
The Pearl at the Palms | 4 p.m. to 10 p.m.
-
Willie Nelson at Planet Hollywood Theatre for the Performing Arts
Planet Hollywood Resort and Casino | 9 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.
-
Cash'd Out at Aliante Station
Aliante Station Casino and Hotel | 9 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.
-
Brooks & Dunn at the Hilton
Las Vegas Hilton
-
Ron White performs at the Mirage
Terry Fator Theatre
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.
Technorati











