Columnist Mike O’Callaghan: Ignoring voters and Constitution
Friday, June 8, 2001 | 4:53 a.m.
Mike O'Callaghan is the Las Vegas Sun executive editor.
Twice in the last two months the alert citizens of Boulder City have gone to the polls and told the mayor and City Council they can't give themselves pay raises without first facing the voters. In fact, 61 percent of the voters also decided that some of the other goodies the city fathers had voted for themselves should be removed.
While the people of Boulder City were watching the store, their legislators in Carson City were participating in a political scam that has been in the political sausage grinder for years. What the 2001 Legislature accomplished was to spit in the eyes of Nevadans by subverting their expressed will and the Nevada Constitution.
The story began back in 1970 when voters answered the pleas of District Court judges and justices of the Nevada Supreme Court and extended their terms of office from four to six years. This was the right thing to do, but within the next two decades the beneficiaries of the term extension began to complain about waiting six years for pay raises. So they played illicit games of hiding money to be paid for "additional duties." These dollars were made available to justices who didn't benefit immediately from pay raises. It is, according to the Nevada Constitution, required that elected state officials must face the voters again before getting a pay increase. This requirement was being ignored by both the legislators and justices.
Then the justices and judges went to the Legislature to get a Joint Resolution passed that proposed to amend the state Constitution and allow increases in salaries of justices and judges during their terms in office.
Less than seven years ago, in the 1994 general election, the state's voters got a crack at the request. Question No. 3 asked, "Shall the Nevada Constitution be amended to allow an increase in the salaries of justices of the Supreme Court and District Court judges during their term of office?" Nevada voters answered with 309,137 NO votes to 58,363 YES votes. The justices, judges and legislators had their question answered.
Not being easily persuaded, some of the justices went back to the old game of special "extra duty' payments. That's when the court's conscience, then-Chief Justice Tom Steffen, told them it was unconstitutional.
During the 2001 Nevada Legislature the justices and judges went back to their legislative pals, some of them lawyers, for help in getting around the state's Constitution and the will of the people. Two justices and one Las Vegas District Court judge spent more time in the Legislature this spring than they did in their offices or on the bench.
From their efforts came Senate Bill 184, which says that certain justices shall be appointed to "the Supreme Court commission on law libraries" and be entitled to receive $32,400 yearly above their base salaries. The recipients of the extra dollars would be those who don't become eligible for pay increases granted by the Legislature because they don't face the voters for another few years. The same arrangement is made for some District Court judges.
Very simply, the Legislature has, along with the state's judicial system, created a scam to get around the will of the people and the state Constitution.
No doubt that the pay raises also provided by the 2001 Legislature are both healthy and deserved. The justices got raises from $107,600 to $140,000 and district judges from $100,000 to $130,000. These increases are earned and most proper. It's just a shame that the keepers of our precious legal system stooped so low to get under a barrier wisely written into our highest legal document and strongly supported by the people of Nevada.
Boulder City voters jerked the chain on their runaway city officials. Now it's time for every Nevadan to ask their legislators why they treated the Nevada Constitution so shabbily. Why didn't they send the justices and judges back to the voters for a constitutional change? Because they knew that such a change isn't what Nevadans want or would approve. Now it's on the governor's desk.
Voters, your legislators sent you a message. Did you get it?
archive
- Most Read
- Discussed
- Most E-mailed
- Kruger hoping his team will play with grit
- Ten minutes with Chelsea Handler is better than no minutes with Chelsea Handler
- Pricing out wagers on the Pacquiao-Cotto fight
- RTC bus driver fired, arrested after allegedly attacking woman
- Two second-graders involved in shooting at bus stop
- CityCenter Realtors hit with cut in commissions
- Privé owner files for bankruptcy protection in Florida
- Trainers scuffle at Manny Pacquiao, Miguel Cotto weigh-in
- Shanghai’s maglev: Flying with both feet on the ground
- Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs among stars in Las Vegas for Manny Pacquiao-Miguel Cotto fight
Blogs
The Greene Room
Predicting this weekend's Mountain West football slate
Top Chef: Las Vegas
Top Chef Episode 11: Child's play
Miech Again
UNLV prez Smatresk is ready for some basketball (5 Comments)
Politics: The Early Line
Harry Reid's fourth TV ad begins running today
The Greene Room
Chad Ochocinco vs. Anderson Silva? That would be a sight ... (4 Comments)
Top Chef: Las Vegas
The Jet Stream: The three stages of chefdom
Miech Again
Rebels rookie Lopez says redshirting is his best move (12 Comments)
Calendar »
- 14 Sat
- 15 Sun
- 16 Mon
- 17 Tue
- 18 Wed
-
Pacquiao vs. Cotto at the MGM Grand Garden Arena
MGM Grand Garden Arena | 6 p.m. to 11 p.m.
-
Friends of India Diwali Celebration at Cashman Field with Dan Nainan
Cashman Field | 7:30 p.m. to 10 p.m.
-
Norm MacDonald at the House of Blues
House of Blues
-
Boulder City Art Guild Winter Fest Fine Art Show
Boulder City Parks & Recreation
-
John Fogerty at the Star of the Desert Arena
Star of the Desert Arena | 8 p.m. to 11 p.m.
-
Emeril Lagasse Foundation’s 5th annual Carnivale du Vin
The Venetian Resort Hotel Casino | 6 p.m. to 10 p.m.
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.
Technorati








