Columnist Sandy Thompson: Child support boost may be a bust
Friday, July 13, 2001 | 4:17 a.m.
Sandy Thompson is vice president / associate editor of the Las Vegas Sun. She may be reached at 259-4025 or e-mail at thompson@lasvegassun.com
DID THE 2001 Legislature address the issue of child support?
Well, sorta.
Will it result in more money going to kids?
Well, maybe not.
According to community activist Knight Allen, only the richest children may see an increase. The vast majority of children whose noncustodial parents earn $50,000 or less will see no increase, he says.
The original bill draft sought to raise the monthly child support cap per child from $500 to $785. Allen says the proposal was clean and clear. Although the cap had not been raised in 14 years, lawmakers did not have the appetite for such an increase.
The Senate Judiciary Committee didn't address the issue at all, and let the proposal die, Allen says. The Assembly Judiciary Committee altered the amounts from the original proposal and sent a revised Assembly Bill 37 to the full Legislature, which then approved it. The new amounts will kick in July 1, 2002. Thereafter, they will be adjusted based on the Consumer Price Index.
The new maximum monthly amounts, based on the following monthly gross incomes of noncustodial parents, are:
* $0-$4,167 -- $500
* $4,168-$6,250 -- $550
* $6,251-$8,333 -- $600
* $8,334-$10,417 -- $650
* $10,418-$12,500 -- $700
* $12,501-$14,583 -- $750
So if a noncustodial parent earns $50,000 a year, the maximum amount of support he/she may pay for one child each month is $500.
That figure, though, can be adjusted upward or downward by a Family Court judge based on certain factors: the cost of health insurance and child care; special education needs; the age of the child; the value of services contributed by either parent; public assistance paid to support the child; the amount of time the child spends with each parent; the relative income of both parents; any expenses reasonably related to the mother's pregnancy and confinement; the cost of transportation of the child to and from visitation; any other necessary expenses for the benefit of the child; and the legal responsibility of the parents for the support of others.
The Legislature added the word "legal" to the last circumstance. The thinking is that a court doesn't have to consider a person's support of an aging parent or stepchildren when figuring child support. So there is wiggle room in determining actual child support amounts. The rub in some cases will be collecting the support.
Elana Hatch, chief deputy district attorney with the district attorney's Family Support Division, says the new law won't be more difficult to enforce, but it will be more labor intensive.
She says the Family Support Division is working to make its system more user-friendly. The division has voice response units whereby people can call in and get certain information about a case such as court dates and payment histories. Call 1-800-992-0900, ext. 6845171, for a PIN number. That will allow you to get information about your case when you call 486-1646.
The goal is to cut down on the amount of calls and the time callers are on hold waiting for information about payments. Of course, not all the information about the case will be available, and you still may have to speak to a live person for other details.
It's unclear as to who or what agency will be responsible for notifying noncustodial parents of any increases based on the new law or the CPI.
Although critical of the new law because he says it only helps children in high-income brackets, Allen admits it's better than no legislative action at all. He laments that the law was based on the parents' perspectives rather than the kids'.
To be fair, the Legislature made great strides in some children's issues. But lawmakers alone aren't responsible for making children a priority.
That's something we all must do. Let's start with parents who care enough to provide their children with the necessary emotional and financial support.
archive
- Most Read
- Discussed
- Most E-mailed
- General Growth moving subsidiaries out of bankruptcy protection
- Man on death row for 1990 Vegas murder kills self
- Justin Hawkins is a Rebel with many causes
- When did Binion’s $1 million display appear?
- Metro officer remembered as ‘protector’ of family, community
- 6th arrest made in officer’s death; 5 face formal charges
- Marcus Jones finds his true passion in hunt for UFC contract
- Sen. Steven Horsford parked in handicap spot for hours
- Henderson educator named Nevada Teacher of the Year
- Harrah’s working on plan to take over Planet Hollywood
Blogs
The Kats Report
Twenty years ago today, Human Nature took root on the farm
'DWTS' champ Donny Osmond still deft afoot in return to Flamingo (2 Comments)
Politics: The Early Line
Meeting of GOP governors draws challengers, not Gibbons (2 Comments)
Politics: Ralston's Flash
Oscar loves forcing developers to sign labor peace agreements, Culinary loves the city's downtown plans and all is forgiven (2 Comments)
Now and Then
Underdog is open on a post pattern
Miech Again
Kruger contract altered in September (6 Comments)
Robin Leach's Las Vegas Celebrity Watch
Photo Gallery: Donny Osmond brings DWTS trophy to Las Vegas
Calendar »
- 26 Thu
- 27 Fri
- 28 Sat
- 29 Sun
- 30 Mon
-
Food drive with Adam Hunter at Bonkerz Comedy Club
Bonkerz Comedy Club | 8 p.m. to 10 p.m.
-
DJ Battle at Drai's
Drai's Afterhours | 10 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.
-
2012 at Cheyenne Saloon
Cheyenne Saloon | 10 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.
-
Sampson's Army at the Double Down Saloon
Double Down Saloon | 10 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.
Technorati












