Las Vegas newspapers split on presidential endorsements

Monday, Oct. 23, 2000 | 11:02 a.m.

Reflecting the sentiment of undecided voters statewide, Las Vegas' two daily newspapers Sunday were split in their presidential endorsements.

The Las Vegas Review-Journal endorsed Texas Gov. George W. Bush for president, saying his policies offer the best chance for prosperity in the future.

The Las Vegas Sun backed Vice President Al Gore, saying his experience, knowledge of the issues and policies would serve America the best.

The Review-Journal sided with Bush's policies to privatize part of Social Security, improve education, offer tax relief and slow rising prescription drug costs.

"The new economy and the new century demand a new vision," the newspaper wrote. "On issues including entitlements, education, tax policy, the environment, and the role of the federal government, Mr. Bush has put forth innovative proposals that break from the typical beltway perspective. Mr. Gore has largely embraced the status quo."

The Sun praised Gore's policies on tax relief, health care, Social Security and foreign affairs, saying they're in the best interests of Nevada and the nation. The newspaper notes the economy has dramatically improved under President Clinton and Gore.

"If there is an emerging theme in this presidential race, it is that Bush's plans would tend to benefit either the wealthy or powerful special interest groups," the newspaper wrote.

"Gore's policies are more fair, ensuring that all Americans would continue to share in the fruits of this nation's robust economy."

The newspapers differed on which candidate would best help Nevada officials block a federal proposal to store high-level nuclear waste in the state.

The Sun said Gore has stood with Nevada on the issue, while Bush has waffled.

"If Gore isn't elected, then the gravest threat to this state's health and safety will be one more stop closer to reality," the newspaper wrote.

The Review-Journal notes members of both parties want to store nuclear waste in Nevada.

"In fact, single-issue voters on the matter of (storing waste at) Yucca Mountain would be far better off casting a ballot for Ralph Nader - the only candidate to say he'd fight long-term storage - than for either Mr. Bush or Mr. Gore," the newspaper wrote.