Editorial: Not ready for school vouchers
Monday, Nov. 13, 2000 | 10:09 a.m.
It should be clear to politicians by now that the public is not ready for tax-supported school vouchers. California and Michigan defeated voucher proposals in their general elections last week, bringing to 10 the number of statewide voucher initiatives that have been rejected across the nation. A voucher bill also died during Nevada's 1999 legislative session.
Vouchers as currently proposed are a bad idea because proponents have never clearly explained how they can work without destroying public schools, particularly in the inner cities. Proponents argue that, because vouchers are intended to give parents a choice of schools, public education would actually improve because it would be forced to compete with private schools. We do not buy that argument.
The result will actually be a sharp division between educational haves and have-nots. The California proposal would have given parents the option of using $4,000 in state tax revenue per child to help defray the tuition of a private school. That is revenue that otherwise would have gone to fund public schools. The money, in essence, would have followed the child.
Such proposals would enable affluent families to supplement vouchers with their own money to send their children to the best private schools. But lower-income families would not have enough money of their own to supplement the vouchers and would be left behind in public schools forced to operate with even less funding.
The hallmark of public education is that it affords children equal opportunity to develop the building blocks needed to achieve the American Dream. But vouchers would create an uneven playing field. Instead of making public schools more competitive, the tax revenue allocated to finance vouchers would actually suck money out of those schools. There would be less money for teachers, buses, classroom computers, books and chalk. There also would be no public accountability for the way tax money is spent in private schools.
The more prudent idea is to continue to increase funding for public education, where we have already made a major investment. We cannot ignore the fact that there are problems in public schools, such as disappointing reading scores and dropout rates here in Nevada. But turning our backs on public education for the sake of gimmicks such as vouchers would not be wise.
archive
- Most Read
- Discussed
- Most E-mailed
- Wynns agree on ‘amicable’ split of assets in divorce
- Report details events leading to officer’s fatal shooting
- Golden Nugget opens $150 million, 500-room tower
- Could the game be partly to blame for addiction?
- Sluggish starts plague Rebels in early games this season
- Hundreds mourn slain Metro officer, denounce violence
- Report: LV home prices fall despite increases nationwide
- Funeral procession for slain officer includes Las Vegas Strip
- Boyd Gaming sues man over Internet domain name
- General Growth moving subsidiaries out of bankruptcy protection
Blogs
Politics: The Early Line
Meeting of GOP governors draws challengers, not Gibbons (1 Comment)
Politics: Ralston's Flash
Oscar loves forcing developers to sign labor peace agreements, Culinary loves the city's downtown plans and all is forgiven (1 Comment)
Now and Then
Underdog is open on a post pattern
Miech Again
Kruger contract altered in September (1 Comment)
Robin Leach's Las Vegas Celebrity Watch
Photo Gallery: Donny Osmond brings DWTS trophy to Las Vegas
High School Sports Scene
Prep Football: State Semifinals Picks (1 Comment)
Shark Bytes
Sharing some Thanksgiving traditions (3 Comments)
Calendar »
- 25 Wed
- 26 Thu
- 27 Fri
- 28 Sat
- 29 Sun
-
Food drive at LAX
LAX Nightclub | 10 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.
-
Judge Jules at Godskitchen
Body English | 10:30 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.
-
Univision TV hosts at Blush
Blush Boutique Nightclub | 10 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.
-
Mischieve Wednesdays at T&T
Tacos and Tequila
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.
Technorati













