Letter: Prove Limbaugh to be malicious

Friday, June 16, 2000 | 9:31 a.m.

James Hilliard's June 7 letter, "Limbaugh most malicious of all," has to be one of the dumbest arguments ever on your letters page. Why? Because there was no argument there at all, although some readers might believe there was.

To advance an argument, there should be a point, supported by example and reason. While the writer made the point of attacking radio talk show host Rush Limbaugh as blinded by "hate and maliciousness," the attempted argument fails due to the lack of either example or reason.

It would have been enlightening to have seen a complete argument here.

If Limbaugh is indeed hateful and malicious as charged, where is the evidence?

LEO D. TAFOLLA

archive