Editorial: Legislature needs testimonial limits

Friday, Dec. 1, 2000 | 11:03 a.m.

Traditions die hard -- so the Nevada Legislature is finding it hard to curb the resolutions it bestows on people who have made noteworthy contributions. But the trouble with these testimonials, which can run an hour or more, is that they take up valuable time that otherwise could be spent debating important legislation.

The resolutions have especially become troublesome since a constitutional amendment passed in 1998 requires that legislative sessions be limited to 120 days, which has trimmed nearly two months off the lawmakers' calendar. A number of resolutions honor national organizations, but as the Sun's Cy Ryan reported Wednesday, those taking the most time are testimonials honoring prominent Nevadans. This, in turn, prompts many legislators to speak about the citizen's contributions, which often includes the presentation of a memorial to family members if the honoree is deceased.

A legislative committee addressing the issue of resolutions didn't settle on final recommendations, leaving it up to the leadership in the Senate and the Assembly. To save time, the Legislature should all but eliminate public ceremonies that involve national groups. And for those Nevadans who are being recognized, the Legislature should follow the suggestion of Assembly Minority Leader Lynn Hettrick, R-Minden, limiting remarks to just two lawmakers instead of letting everyone speak. For that matter, what the Legislature doesn't need anymore are designations such as naming April 21 as E. Clampus Vitus Day at the Legislature. For those unfamiliar with E. Clampus Vitus Day, it is most noted for its dedication to partying.

archive