Judge-elect suing ethics committee
Monday, Nov. 30, 1998 | 11:10 a.m.
Family Court Judge-elect Robert Lueck, one of three judicial candidates who was chided by a state judicial ethics committee over campaign ads, filed a federal court lawsuit today claiming his free-speech rights were violated.
He joins Family Court Judge Gary Redmon and attorney James Mahan in challenging the constitutionality of the actions by the the Standing Committee on Judicial Ethics and Election Practices.
Redmon and Mahan also were chastised by the committee over statements they made during their campaigns.
If the three win, it could gut the power of the committee, which was created by the Nevada Supreme Court in 1997 as a way of cleaning up judicial elections. Those elections have been some of the most contentious and drawn considerable criticism from the legal community and the public.
The intent was to provide an avenue of immediate recourse for questionable campaign practices that could unfairly skew an election.
But the three Clark County candidates who felt the committee's wrath say the committee has gone too far and stepped on the candidates' First Amendment rights.
Lueck was found on Oct. 30 to have violated a canon of judicial ethics by stating in a campaign ad that his opponent -- incumbent Family Court Judge Fran Fine -- had been "convicted" of judicial misconduct and removed from office.
The committee concluded the term "convicted" improperly implied a criminal violation had occurred when that was not the case.
In his lawsuit, Lueck charged that the committee "engaged in intentional and deliberate acts of censorship."
"The content of the advertisements were factually and legally correct," the lawsuit stated.
Although Lueck and his lawyer, John Watkins, concede the committee's action did not have an effect on the election's outcome -- Lueck won with 68 percent of the vote -- they contend the action taints the new judge's stature.
"The committee's decision is false and defamatory in that the decision states that Lueck did violate a canon of judicial ethics ... by knowingly misrepresenting a material fact," the lawsuit stated.
Lueck said he did not misrepresent any facts but still changed the wording.
The lawsuit argues that federal action is necessary, because there is no judicial review of the committee's actions at the state level. In addition, the suit argues, the declaration of ethical wrongdoing could be used against Lueck in future elections.
Lueck wants a court order stating the committee's opinion about him cannot be enforced and an injunction "prohibiting the committee from conducting itself as a censorship body for political advertisements for judicial candidates."
In the case of Mahan, who ran unsuccessfully for District Court Department 17, the committee concluded he did not maintain "the dignity appropriate to judicial office" by running ads implying his opponent was likely to sympathize with criminals.
Mahan was ordered to remove a television commercial showing defendants joyful at the prospect of Special Public Defender Mike Cherry becoming a judge.
Cherry won the election.
In the case of Redmon -- a current Family Court judge who was running for a newly created Department 19 seat on the civil-criminal court -- the committee stated that his ads implied he was the incumbent.
He changed his ads and won the election over longtime attorney Drake Delanoy.
archive
- Most Read
- Discussed
- Most E-mailed
- Wonder drug for men no success story
- Metro admits to improper release of criminal history data
- CityCenter: One man’s concept of a real city
- If Palin’s book is so bad, then why is it a best-seller?
- Was a foiled bank heist a cry for help?
- Bellfield tolls again for UNLV in 76-71 win over Louisville
- Metro corrections officer remembered for his love of family
- Notebook: UNLV prospect Polee likes what he sees, and hears, at the Mack
- UNLV recalls last year’s close shave at Louisville
- Live game blog: Bellfield, UNLV come through late, upset No. 16 Louisville
Blogs
The Kats Report
If the message is 'rock out,' then KISS is indeed a message band (1 Comment)
Could a savior of shuttered Las Vegas Art Museum be ... Peter Max? (6 Comments)
For Paul Stanley and KISS, rock and roll is not over (6 Comments)
Twenty years ago today, Human Nature took root on the farm (1 Comment)
Robin Leach's Las Vegas Celebrity Watch
Photo Gallery: Donny Osmond’s triumphant return to the Flamingo
The Kats Report
'DWTS' champ Donny Osmond still deft afoot in return to Flamingo (8 Comments)
Politics: The Early Line
Meeting of GOP governors draws challengers, not Gibbons (5 Comments)
Calendar »
- 29 Sun
- 30 Mon
- 1 Tue
- 2 Wed
- 3 Thu
-
Tahoe Takeover at The Bank
The Bank | 10 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.
-
Playboy Club model search
Playboy Club | 10 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.
-
Queen of Queens at Revolution Lounge
Beatles Revolution Lounge | 10 p.m. to 11:59 p.m.
-
Zowie Bowie's Vintage Vegas Show at Monte Carlo
Lance Burton Theater
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.
Technorati











