Editorial: Court gives dial tone for privacy
Friday, Dec. 11, 1998 | 12:25 p.m.
In a 3-2 decision, the Nevada Supreme Court upheld the sanctity of privacy rights Wednesday when it ruled that the state's wiretap law prevents someone from secretly tape recording telephone conversations. Justice Bill Maupin said that, absent a court order, the intent of the Legislature was clear in that both parties must consent to the recording of a conversation for it to be legal.
Wednesday's ruling arose from an age discrimination suit filed in 1992 by Randy Lane, who was fired by Allstate Insurance Co. in Washoe County. The insurance company sought to dismiss Lane's suit, alleging that he illegally tape-recorded more than 700 telephone conversations with two of the company's executives and more than 180 witnesses.
District Court Judge Deborah Agosti, who in November was elected to the Nevada Supreme Court, correctly determined the illegality of Lane's actions and dismissed his suit. Upholding Agosti's lower-court decision, Maupin noted that the Legislature "prohibited surreptitious intrusion upon in-person, private conversations by means of any listening device."
Justices Charles Springer and Bob Rose dissented. Splitting legal hairs, Springer argued that a conversation cannot be intercepted if only two people are involved; only if a third party is listening in can the law be broken. Rose, meanwhile, believes the law only applies to public officials and law enforcement officers, not to private citizens.
Springer and Rose are both wrong. Springer should realize that one person alone can violate another individual's right to privacy; Rose misinterprets the law and fails to acknowledge that corporations and individuals are just as capable of violating privacy rights as governments are.
Some might see this as an attempt by an employee to gather information to right a wrong. The problem is that the method used violates someone else's right. While the Supreme Court is to be commended for its decision, the razor-thin vote is troubling and should serve as a warning to the precariousness of privacy.
archive
- Most Read
- Discussed
- Most E-mailed
- ‘Stripper-mobile’ with live dancers raises safety, decency concerns
- Report: State’s economy worse off than any other
- Freddie Roach: Miguel Cotto not the same since knockout
- Rebels survive scare from Division-II Washburn
- Study cites challenges of Nevada’s financial problems
- Tourism companies embrace social media strategies
- Fans float replacement for UNLV football coach
- Six search warrants served on Hells Angels
- Analysts say Dean Heller’s arguments on health care don’t add up
- County budget cuts expected, but how much?
Blogs
Top Chef: Las Vegas
The Jet Stream: The three stages of chefdom
Miech Again
Rebels rookie Lopez says redshirting is his best move (11 Comments)
Politics: Ralston's Flash
Lawsuit filed to block "personhood" initiative
Elsewhere
Rumors of Matt Hughes v. Renzo Gracie
The Kats Report
Ten minutes with Chelsea Handler is better than no minutes with Chelsea Handler (2 Comments)
Business Notebook
Meeting cancellations prompting suits; economic diversification vs. growth
Now and Then
Antoine Walker doesn't know when to hold or fold 'em (1 Comment)
Calendar »
- 12 Thu
- 13 Fri
- 14 Sat
- 15 Sun
- 16 Mon
-
Las Vegas Wranglers vs. Utah Grizzlies
Orleans Hotel-Casino
-
Lily Tomlin at the Hollywood Theatre
Hollywood Theatre at MGM Grand
-
Leonard Cohen at The Colosseum
The Colosseum | 8 p.m. to 11 p.m.
-
Football specials at Diablo's
Diablos Cantina
The Sun
Locally owned and independent for more than 50 years.
Technorati











