Letter: O.J. double jeopardy trials violated constitutional rights
Tuesday, Feb. 18, 1997 | 11:59 a.m.
The Fifth Amendment of the Constitution protects against such double jeopardy and, in 1969, the Supreme Court found that the 14th Amendment brought the applicability of the Fifth to the states. Do we ignore the Bill of Rights because the unanimous verdict of the first jury was widely unpopular? Is this a trend we want to see propagated -- criminal-case acquittals being retried in civil court for plaintiffs with either the funds or enough press for a second trial to be profitable for attorneys?
Is this what we, as a nation, have reduced ourselves to?
Skip Folden
archive
Most Popular
- Viewed
- Discussed
- E-mailed
- Photos: Holly Madison celebrates MDW at Sugar Factory, Chateau
- Photos: Bachelorette Meagan Good at Pussycat Dolls Burlesque Saloon
- Photos: Incubus wishes you were here (at The Joint in the Hard Rock Hotel)
- Brock Lesnar, Alistair Overeem could remain players in UFC heavyweight class
- Riviera CEO Andy Choy takes a gamble with classic casino






Facebook Connect