Las Vegas Sun

June 19, 2013

Currently: 91° | Complete forecast | Log in

Adelson to DCCC: Retract your “Chinese prostitution money” comments or I’ll sue

Tuesday, July 17, 2012 | 1:16 p.m.

In a scathing letter to the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, Sheldon Adelson's lawyer accused the organization of "maliciously branding Mr. Adelson as a pimp" and demanded the DCCC either retract and apologize or be sued.

The three-page missive to DCCC press secretary Jesse Ferguson refers to a claim already rated "Pants on Fire" by PoitiFact because it is a claim made in a lawsuit against the Las Vegas Sands chairman, who is dominating the headlines this cycle with his SuperPAC donations. The letter demands the claim be scrubbed from the DCCC site as well as an apology -- "a prominent statement, in a form approved by Mr. Adelson, retracting and apologizing for your false claims."

I have posted it at right.

Waiting for response from DCCC.

Discussion: 16 comments so far...

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. If he sues this could allow the DCCC to get access to video tapes at his property and they may find something else, Who knows

    Law suits have a way of evolving into something else.

  2. As the Plaintiff in a high profile libel/defamation action (MILLER v. JONES), I can attest that the DCCC clearly committed libel per se in this instance. Their actions were indefensible.

  3. Uh, Shelly? I say if the shoe fits, wear it, and wear it proud. Life is too short, especially at his age to be so litigious at the risk of exposing/incriminating himself if he is indeed what the DCCC say he is.

  4. Adelson has forgotten about the trial of Peter Zenger on Aug 4, 1735 which was the cornerstone for Freedom of the Press, Freedom to Publish and to Speak.

    "Extra Extra - Read all about it."

    It's time that Sheldon Adelson learned to be an American instead of a surrogate for Israel and Macau. Lots of jobs in Macau, right Sheldon?

  5. SunJon, apparently you forgot to read Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc. (1974)

    Zenger only applies if the DCCC can prove their statement to be true. Otherwise Gertz applies towards a finding of defamation.

    And contrary to casinokid's dream of "access to video tapes", case law requires that the DCCC support the truthfulness of their statement with evidence already in their possession.

Post a comment

Commenting requires registration.

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy.

If you would like to submit your comment as a letter to the editor, you may submit it here.

Most Popular