Las Vegas Sun

May 25, 2013

Currently: 81° | Complete forecast | Log in

Fire chief who asked for sick days off three months in advance made $200,000 that year

Wednesday, Feb. 16, 2011 | 3:51 p.m.

Fire battalion chief Gina Hall, who in emails posted elsewhere on this blog is seen asking for sick days off three months in advance, made $200,000 in that year, 2009, according to payroll records I have obtained. The records show how firefighters, under their contract with the county, were able to augment their base pay with a variety of methods, including sick, overtime and longevity pay.

And the recipient of Hall's email, fellow chief Renee Dillingham, made $250,000 in 2009.

We will have more on this on "Face to Face" on Thursday, and we will have the county's expert on sick leave abuse, Ed Finger, on the program on Friday.

Discussion: 28 comments so far...

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. Another example of waste, fraud and abuse of public money. Governments have not been good stewards of our tax dollars. Tax increases cannot be justified until we have expenses under control.

  2. Bet these two broads never were on a firetruck - at least not going to fight fires.

  3. A little sexist are we Det_Munch? I don't know what gender has to do with anything. There were plenty of firefighters of the male persuasion doing the same. This is about lack of morals not about skill levels. Try to stay on topic.

  4. Unless she can prove she was in a hospital, or otherwise seeking medical attention (who know's they're going to be sick on an exact date 3 months from now?), she should have to pay back, double the amount and have a week docked from the amount of days worked toward pension for every day "stolen" in this way. She needs to go read the article about the minimum wage workers on these pages, maybe she'll realize things could be A LOT worse.

  5. I think it would be best to eliminate sick pay altogether. If you don't get sick you still have that time available so you are entilited to it. So if Joe was sick (really sick) 7 days last year and got paid for it Bill was not sick at all but he has 7 days due him for sick leave now. It is the system. Give everyone x number of days per year off, making a portion of them flexible. As it is they use the system to get thier days off they did not use being sick resulting in overtime pay for others, this is the part that needs to stop. They need to call a body to replace them at the same rate of pay, this is how the airlines do it.

  6. The tip of the iceberg folks. The tippy tip of it.

  7. There are several things that can be done to remove the incentives to abuse the system and eliminate fraud.

    First and foremost, make sick time a use it or lose it proposition. Much of the fraud stems from employees close to retirement trying to cash in as much as possible of accrued sick time.

    Second, do not include anything other than base pay in PERS calculations.

    Third, require a medical clearance for any absence longer than 3 shifts or if more than 6 sick days have been used in a calendar year.

    Fourth, and this one will really upset a few, no OT rates should be paid on callbacks until an amount of time equal to any sick time used has been worked on callbacks. In other words, you should have to work off the time used if possible before collecting OT for being called back. I could be using the wrong terms but the intent should be clear.

    But beyond this, the county negotiators and commissioners should have seen the potential for this abuse and fraud and taken steps to prevent it in the first place.

  8. Chunky says:

    He worries this issue will slowly and silently get swept under the carpet and off our radar!

    Thanks to Mr. Ralston for keeping this in the news.

    That's what Chunky thinks!

Post a comment

Commenting requires registration.

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy.

If you would like to submit your comment as a letter to the editor, you may submit it here.

Most Popular