76 Comments
Facebook
Fark
Digg
Reddit
Stumble
Steve Marcus
Republican U.S. Senate candidate Sharron Angle, center, greets supporters during the grand opening of her North Las Vegas campaign headquarters, 5710 Simmons St.
Published Thursday, Aug. 12, 2010 | 2:19 p.m.
Updated Thursday, Aug. 12, 2010 | 6:57 p.m.
Republican Senate candidate Sharron Angle chalks up her shift -- some say flip-flop -- on Social Security to gathering more information.
Angle said today during the opening of her North Las Vegas headquarters that she never wanted to privatize Social Security. Instead, she said, she wants to "personalize" it.
But during a debate in May on the public affairs show “Face to Face With Jon Ralston,” Angle said, “We need to phase Medicare and Social Security out in favor of something privatized.”
Democratic Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid has assailed his opponent for the comment. He opposes Social Security privatization.
President George W. Bush also tried to privatize a portion of the Social Security program in 2005. The move was defeated, and Republicans saw their popularity plummet.
"When I said privatize, I thought we'd have to go to the private sector for a model" that would protect people's money, Angle said today.
Angle said she now has learned that some public employees -- she named Reid -- have retirement accounts that also are safe from government intervention. Hence, she changed her verbiage, she explained.
"Before her D.C. handlers put a muzzle on her, Sharron Angle spent her entire political career loudly and proudly denouncing Social Security and promising to dismantle the program entirely," Reid spokesman Kelly Steele responded. "At this point, she must believe that Nevada voters...are ignorant or they have amnesia."
Earlier in the day, Angle released a television ad in which she accuses Reid of raiding the Social Security fund for "his own pet projects."
Any comment by Angle and the Sun runs with it. Reed says he doesn't know how any hispanic could vote republican and not a mention of it here. What if it's a hispanic that speaks with a negro dialect?
My wife was born and raised in Mexico. She is now a US citizen and is a devout capitalist and republican. If Harry Reed would like to speak with her directly she will gladly explain why.
VIVA Sharon Angle!
Behind the rhetoric: Sharron Angle's real position on social security (hint: kill it) http://bit.ly/cKNMRU
Yes Sharron. Give Wall Street our Social Security money.
We can all gamble on how much money we will have each month to live on after we retire. All that new money will give Walls Street more power to control our government and our lives. How will I live if I make bad investment decisions and have no monthly Social Security check???
Do you want the people to gamble with their retirement security, Sharron??? Sharron, what was that word of knowledge God gave you concerning gambling?????
Did she poll the Tea Party before making this shift?
I doubt it. That is if we're to believe what the TP
was saying exactly a year ago this month in all those town hall meetings.
On the other hand, given the Tea Party's close alliance with the GOP, its Seniors will probably walk in lockstep with her.
Anyway, I've been on Social Security for 3 years and as is it's one great program. Well worth having paid into it all those years.
Make no mistake about it, Sharron Angle wants
to privatize Social Security.
This crazy idea will dismantle and distroy
Social Security.
SAVE SOCIAL SECURITY,
VOTE HARRY REID.
This woman has a new catch word each week for turning over Social Security to the Wall Street vampires. I agree teamster,
SAVE SOCIAL SECURITY. VOTE REID.
Greedy republicans made this MESS and they
want to continue down the SAME GEORGE BUSH PATH.
These greedy republican liars will say anything
to get back into power.
SAVE SOCIAL SECURITY,
VOTE HARRY REID.
There are those who say; to save Social Security you should vote for Harry Reid. My one question is how can they save Social Security when the Democrats are borrowing and spending money faster than ever before? Social Security is broke and all the money that should have been saved intio the Social Security trust fund rests now in the form of IOUs. There is no more money. And what is being paid out is more than what they are taking in. How long can that last?
Wow. There are people that will vote for her.
Republicans want more Wal-mart greeters! Keeps wages low for their corporate overlords! Dubya wanted to privatize social security too! Can't believe anyone over 40 and 1/2 a brain would vote for this stupid, stupid, woman!
I pay a little over 250 a month on ss. Over 40 years that equals 120,000 dollars. If I start work at age 20 and retire at 60. How much will the government give me a month? What if I just invested the 250 a month, compounded the interest. How much real money would I have?
Let's say I die at 65. I can leave the money that I worked for to familly. What do u get with ss? 0
Harry Ried knows how to spend our money better than us, that's basically what he is saying. Sounds like Angel wants us to keep our own money? Sounds fair doesn't it?
anthony......
We're not going to let you greedy republicans
kill our Social Security.
Don't even think about it.
@ airweare. Your post doesn't male sense? Maybe I only put in 100 a month, but I could put in 350 if the government didn't take my money. Why should I give it to the government when all they do is "mostly" waste it. Although, government is ok to a point, national security is one, not the wars we got going on now.
@Teamster. That's your response? What a joke. You must be in a union, can't think for yourself.
I am surpised Mrs. Angle claims to know so little about federal pensions -- I believe her husband had a 30 year job created by the federal government (the must despised BLM) from which he and Sharron enjoy a taxpayer funded pension. Social Security on the other hand is funded by private sector payroll taxes paid equally by employers and employees who also pay for Medicare. Federal employees get both health care and retirement and don't have to pay into Social Security or Medicare. Interesting that she started off wanting to wipe out those two programs but overlooked the fat benefits provided to retired federal employees by the taxpayers. Oh, I forget, she gets those benefits, just not the ones that the rest of us get and pay for from our income earned in the private sector. She only changed her position today because her new "advisors" from GOP Headquarters in Washington saw the poll numbers showing how much her real plan of wiping both Medicare and Social Security is scaring the voters. Watch out for her other crazy ideas.
The smearing of Sharron Angle continues. If you like the way things are, keep voting for Reid. Why did the Sun ignore the story about Reid's comments about hispanics?
@Teamster
Hey idiot! Haven't you been reading the papers, or watching the news? Social Security just went into the red, 6 years ahead of what they were estimating it would (2016) Or do you even read your SS Quarterly Statement that mentions that they would be in the red by 2016? The Statement even mentions that if there are not any serious changes made to the system, Social Security will be completely exhausted by 2037. The system is already broken! Get real!
Just another instance of Republican politicians always trying to get their grubby fingers on Social Security. All throughout recent history, it is Republicans, and ONLY Republicans, that come up with idiotic rocket scientist ideas to destroy a popular program.
When Social Security was first made, it was not looked at solely based upon money (as Republicans always seem to portray it as). It was meant for people to pay into, in order to assist other Americans in their golden years. It was meant only for people to take care of people; a system that America was founded upon.
Social Security is not a scam. It's not a Ponzi scheme. It's not a racket. It's not a "free ride." It's not all those other nonsensical terms that Republicans all seem to blatantly lie about. It's people taking care of people. And it has proved throughout the years to become wildly popular.
It may have some faults to it, but the general principle is intact.
My point I'm leading up to is that...I really notice that creepy Republicans seem to be the only ones who want to get ahold of it.
Thank God President Bush was slapped away from it. Because if he had got ahold of it back in 2005, it would have been turned over to Wall Street. And, as evidenced by the economic meltdown of 2007-2008, it would have been picked clean all the way down to the bone much like a buzzard on a coyote carcass. Social Security would have been dead if he had his mismanagerial way.
Now, yet another creepy Republican says she can do something. No, don't want to get rid of it. No, don't want to "privatize" it. No, don't want to "personalize" it. It all sounds like word games to me. Anything to hide the fact she will grab it and screw it up beyond all recognition.
I guess I'm saying...don't let these power mad and money hungry fiscal idiotic Republicans get ahold of a very popular system. Because they will screw it up worse than Godzilla on PCP.
Crazy Angle had to flip flop on Social Security and Medicare since 85% of her teabagging supporters recieve those benefits each month.
Of course Psycho Sharron still wants to do away with all socialist programs (Dept of Education, EPA, Dept of Energy, etc.) and let "free markets" take control -- same as every other far-right wacko -- except for those getting a check, that is.
Social Security has 2 Trillion plus. It is not "broken" or in the red, this is a lie. Also all borrowing from Social Security must be and is paid back with interest so actually adds to Social Security's balance. This has been going on since its inception.
NPR had a good program on Social Security today correcting misinformation. It is solvent and will be when you retire. In order to keep it solvent beyond 2037 most likely very small changes, e.g. a few months re full eligibility , could be made over a period of many years. Social Security will be there for you unless you let Sharron Angle and her ilk destroy it. HANDS OFF OUR SOCIAL SECURITY.
gbigs wrote "Social Security is in the red this year...blah blah blah..."
Like Dorothy in the Wizard of Oz gbigs hopes that by repeating something over and over it'll majically become true and he'll get back to Kansas.
From the 2010 Report of the Social Security Administration:
"The financial outlook for Social Security is little changed from last year. The short term outlook is worsened by a deeper recession than was projected last year, but the overall 75-year outlook is nevertheless somewhat improved primarily because a provision of the ACA is expected to cause a higher share of labor compensation to be paid in the form of wages that are subject to the Social Security payroll tax than would occur in the absence of the legislation. The Disability Insurance (DI) Trust Fund, however, is now projected to become exhausted in 2018, two years earlier than in last year's report. Thus, changes to improve the financial status of the DI program are needed soon.
Social Security expenditures are expected to exceed tax receipts this year for the first time since 1983. The projected deficit of $41 billion this year (excluding interest income) is attributable to the recession and to an expected $25 billion downward adjustment to 2010 income that corrects for excess payroll tax revenue credited to the trust funds in earlier years. This deficit is expected to shrink substantially for 2011 and to return to small surpluses for years 2012-2014 due to the improving economy. After 2014 deficits are expected to grow rapidly as the baby boom generation's retirement causes the number of beneficiaries to grow substantially more rapidly than the number of covered workers. The annual deficits will be made up by redeeming trust fund assets in amounts less than interest earnings through 2024, and then by redeeming trust fund assets until reserves are exhausted in 2037, at which point tax income would be sufficient to pay about 75 percent of scheduled benefits through 2084. The projected exhaustion date for the combined OASI and DI Trust Funds is unchanged from last year's report.
The long-run financial challenges facing Social Security and those that remain for Medicare should be addressed soon. If action is taken sooner rather than later, more options will be available and more time will be available to phase in changes so that those affected have adequate time to prepare."
How many hours a day do you suppose these new "HANDLERS" have to spend with "Crazy Angle" practicing their mantra:
Say ONLY what we TELL YOU to say!
Avoid ANY REFERENCES to your PRIOR STATEMENTS. Deny, Deny, Deny!!!
You may, on occasion, throw in a "WHAT I MEANT TO SAY WAS"...
IF AND ONLY IF you have a CUE CARD WITH THE ANSWER WE GAVE YOU!!! Read it VERBATIM!
and for goodness sakes,
WIPE THAT GOOFY GRIN OFF YOUR FACE!
All you Right-Wingers and Tea Partiers do know that her husband is a retired federal employee don't you....the same federal government that is in the way.
If we lose Social Security and medicare how will all the teabaggers survive?!
They won't have the money to attend rallies to protest against the Social Secuity and Medicare benefits they recieve every month!
Oh my!!
gbigs, click you heels together and repeat what OxyRush said today lol!
sincityidiot.......
You're just another stupid republican who has
no clue about the economy or Social Security.
If you think Angle can fix anything you're
letting your republican goons do your thinking
for you.
Right now, Social Security is sound and will
be until 2037.
Only slight changes will be needed to improve
it.
Republicans need to keep their greedy hands
away from it.
SAVE SOCIAL SECURITY,
VOTE HARRY REID.
Great once AIG and Citibank get ahold of our retirement, we are done. Angle is a NUT and will damage this country.
Privitize or personalize sounds orwellian scary and manipulative. Social Security , Medicare and Harry Reid forever !
My theory is that she is Eva Braun reincarnated.
Teamster,
Can u prove your statement? What has Harry Reid done for Nevada? You resort to name calling and you keep saying bad republicans, but you offer nothing as far as an aswer, you keep calling out for Reid to be your savior. Kinda sickening. Then again he takes care of his union boys, people who can't make their own decisions. Gotta join a gang basically
.
When you give up security for freedom you deserve neither.
I will vote Angel, and a lot of my friends are too. Were far away from rich, but we don't rely on government. Democrats just want your money!!!!
Totally and completely agree with Nick's comment above.
I say again.
Keep these creepy Republicans grubby fingers off of Social Security!
Because they are the only ones who want to change it around. And they want to change it around in order so they make money off of the billions of dollars that are there.
I have never seen a Democrat willing to touch it. Other than to recommend minor changes to make it better. Why? Because it is a successful program that was created for people to take care of people. Not to make money off of.
KEEP THE DAMN REPUBLICANS FROM TOUCHING IT! Because they only want to make money off of it, not to help anyone.
And believe me, Sharron Angle is not a learned politician who has incredible ideas on what is to be done to benefit Nevada. She only wants to benefit herself. No one else. Period.
This woman only runs on attacking Senator Reid. She is complete unable to come up with any ideas to benefit Nevada. Her only goal to win is to slap Senator Reid. And to slap him on stuff that is nonsensical. According the Sharron Reid, Senator Reid is responsible for EVERYTHING that has went wrong in Nevada. No more tourists coming to the Strip in Las Vegas? IT'S SENATOR REID'S FAULT! The road in front of your house has potholes and no one seems to care? IT'S SENATOR REID'S FAULT! It gets ridiculous. But that is the entire basis of her campaign.
Don't let that bat guano crazy woman in. Because things will get worse more than they will get better. She would prove to be an utter embarrassment to Nevada.
Hey teamster dumb a$$!
This is taken directly from the Social Security statement dated March 2010. Very first page:
"About Social Security's future...
In 2016 we will begin paying more in benefits than we collect in taxes. Without changes, by 2037 the Social Security Trust Fund will be exhausted and there will enough money to pay only about 76 cents for each dollar of scheduled benefits. We need to resolve these issues soon to make sure Social Security continues to provide a foundation of protection for future generations."
You can also read this statement from Social Security's own website www.socialsecurity.gov to verify this. And, they announced last week on national news (not Fox news)that they just went into the red.
So, who's stupid now? & I can't wait until we vote that dumb a$$ Reid out in November!
The Sun as we know is a very liberal news organization so take what you read with a grain of salt. Reid runs negative TV ads because he cannot run on his own agenda. Reid-Obama-Pelosi equals a socialist, open border, trillion dollar stimulous spending deficit boot in your neck, looking for whos ass to kick government.
Angle may not be perfect but she vows to keep the entreprenurial American dream alive.
Vote for Reid and say Bye Bye to the America we know...
Privatize, personalize, get rid of... why do you guys have to quibble over every little thing?
If God wants us to have Social Security he'll let Sharron know, alright? Alright then, I'll go back to my "best of Matlock" on the Blue Ray now.
teamsters scribbles: "Make no mistake about it, Sharron Angle wants to privatize Social Security."
Yes as we see here, that the "TEAMSTERS" are not capitalists but communist.
Hail the leader!
http://tinyurl.com/2eynb43
"We Socialists" vs "We The People"
I heart Nevada Wonk by reporter Delen Goldberg.
I heart you too, narf, even though we disagree about religion so you're prolly doomed to burn in H-E-double hockey sticks for eternity. Too bad for you that my God does lots of smot'n because he's jealous, capricious, and vengeful. But other than that, I heart you.
"Jammed down our throats" is narfspeak for--passed by the majority of our representatives.
Today, every greedy republican crawled out from
under the wood work, like dirty cock roaches.
The fake reverend is the worst of the bunch.
This low-life is anti-American..
We Teamsters are hard working AMERICANS.
We live the American dream.
No low-life republicans will ever stop the
Teamsters Union.
Republicans are the ones who sent our jobs to
COMMUNIST CHINA.
We Teamsters support American workers.
@okra
Not wanting to be a fly in the ointment, but as of the August 2nd. Rasmussen Poll, 57% of Americans were against the Health care reform bill passed by Congress. But that was just one site. If anyone could post more recent data, that would be great!http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/healthcare/august_2010/57_say_health_care_plan_bad_for_the_country_59_favor_repeal
sincityidiot......
Rasmussen is a greedy republican.
His polls are useless.
Any American who is against health care reform
for his fellow American is the lowest life form
on the face of this earth.
@teamster dumbass
Your last post about teamsters made you the butt of your own joke! Teamsters never supported any one but themselves! Your almighty teamster union tells you how to think, how to vote, even how you should wipe your own ass. You guys couldn't come up with an independent thought if your very lives depended on it. All for the teamsters, & the teamsters are all, and to hell with what the rest of America thinks about you!
How conservative of you. The value of the dollar can be changed. Sound principles of lending can be changed, though conservatives object. Health care can move from private to public, though 60% object. Candidates who die can have their wife stand in their office without a special election. Federal immigration can overlook legal status in sanctuary cities but local law enforcement can't look at legal status anywhere else. Marriage need not be between a man and a woman.
You'll swallow all this and more because 'change' is good, 'change' is your platform.
But mention that Social Security could use a change up in this the digital age and y'all have a choking convulsion.
What, is Social Security a proprietary patented vote collecting machine that only the Democrats can tinker with?
Talk about a lynching. Sharron Angle clearly wants to preserve the institution of retirement planning under the oversight of responsible leaders. She doesn't care for the trough that our retirement monies are presently slopped into. She notes that a lot of hogs seem to indiscriminantly feed at that trough under present Federal oversight.
Under the startling premise that our money is ours and is not slop, she proposes to change (choke!) the manner in which our money is cared for. CHOKE!
I mean lots of places have health cards tapping into health accounts (our money, matched perhaps). Why so hard to think that money (ours) could be kept in an account (again, ours) until some day it could be accessed with a card (ours) for retirement (ours or our spouses)? Nobody said the money had to go to Wall street.
But you gotta say that its all gonna get lost if we 'change' it. Like it's not getting lost now.
Heard of hacking? Heard of government files getting hacked? Heard of government investments getting lost?
It's not the concept of managed and secured trust accounts that Sharron proposes to eliminate, though you howl that it is. It's the hog trough model ('50's style Social Security), presently failing, that Sharron wants to - take a breath - change.
MICHELE BACHMANN (R), Minnesota
.
.
Did I scare you?... I knew I could.
.
My 6th District of Minnesota has proven that even a raving lunatic can get elected to Congress. Twice.
Why is it that when God talks a right-winger into politics it's a divine thing, but when he talks to a schizophrenic it's proof of mental illness?
bringer.......
Sharron Angle is not going to change anything.
This nut-case is not going to be elected.
Greedy republicans have been against Social
Security from the beginning and privatizing it
will dismantle it.
NOT GOING TO HAPPEN.
If I was hispanic, I'd be pretty pissed by now.
E-veify is a great way of showing you are hard working "Americans". Harry Reid killed that bill. Pay your dues and bow down to your King, instead of being free from Union/political agendas. I wonder what bail-out money got spread though the unions? I'm not down with republicans 100 percent, maybe 80. Jobs sent over seas also have been because of unions and excessive demands. There was a time for unions, not so much nowadays. Unions do build, but they also destroy
No worries unless your "kids look Hispanic," BCDave.
Sincity: polls can be deceiving as I'm sure you already know. When asked about prison terms, most people say sentences should be longer. Ask about raising taxes to pay for more prisons though, and most people say no.
When people are polled people about the individual mandates in the bill, most are in favor of the provisions on a line by line basis. We like the idea of being able to keep dependents on the parents plan longer, and we like that it will be harder for companies to drop people for pre-existing conditions. Finally, as AP likes to say in these threads, the American people had a poll in 08, and they overwhelmingly decided to elect the guy who ran on reforming health care--not the ditzy talibunny from Wasilla and the pathetic old flip flopper guy.
anthony.......
Our Teamsters Union is solid, we don't need any
bail-out money.
Our union offers us a secure job with health
care and a real retirement.
Food industry workers DO NOT make high wages.
Our benefits are what makes the difference.
We put food on your table and our jobs can't
be sent to COMMUNIST CHINA.
"When I said privatize, I thought we'd have to go to the private sector for a model" that would protect people's money, Angle said today. Yes, Frau Angle ... sehr gut!!! Herr Madoff and his buddies on Wall Street are the perfect model to "protect people's money". The plutocrats, and their trailer park supporters, have been flogging this "privatize social security" idea for decades. Privatizing social security is a super TARP-bank bailout for the wall street plutocracy.
I don't know what food service workers make, guess it depends on where one worked.
http://www.howestreet.com/articles/index...
thought you said Teamsters didn't need a bailout?
Yup, BCDave, that narf guy is pretty embarrassing trying to write in Spanish. What I do think about Angle to get elected is the following:
There's no smoke without fire,
No storm without rain,
Sharron might have reached higher,
if she had had a brain.
She only wants fresh banana,
to have fun in her bus,
como ninguna putana,
before she's off to buzz.
There's no smoke without fire,
No storm without rain,
Sharron might have reached higher,
if she had had a brain.
She only wants fresh banana,
to feel the heat in her bus,
como ninguna putana,
complaining 'bout all the fuzz.
There's no smoke without fire,
No storm without rain,
Sharron might have reached higher,
if she had had a brain.
She only wants fresh banana,
to make it hot in her bus,
to splish-splash over her pillow,
and testify 'bout her lust.
There's no smoke without fire,
No storm without rain,
Sharron might have reached higher,
if she had had a brain.
She only wants fresh banana,
to make it tall in her bus,
como ninguna putana
creates a rainfall of lust.
(Let political hypocrites like Angle spend 2% of their private income on social projects like donating to "Straight from the streets" or sending a kid to camp.)
It's very simple, Angle wants to "personalize" Social Security.
Reid wants to give what is effectively amnesty to illegal immigrants.
Who is more likely to succeed if elected?
If you're not rich, why would you ever vote for a Republican? You're just getting suckered to vote against your own economic interests!
Actually it's pretty obvious.... Angle is philosophically against Social Security, and for good reason. She understands just as well as anyone who is under the age of 35 that Social Security is a bankrupt concept and that it will not be there in 30 years time. At the same time, she understands that those who have lived with the expectation of Social Security should be spared as much as possible the brunt of damage from this paradigm shift. So fulfilling the needs of those with the expectations created by Social Security must be tempered against the reality to future generations that the Ponzi scheme cannot persist indefinitely. Those who were sold the bill of goods by prior generations must have something to show for their belief in the impossible while those faced with the truth of the impossible must have a way out of perdition. She understands that the future generations cannot persist in the myth.
"Pay no attention to my previous positions!!! I say what my new "handlers" tell me to say, because, well, my previous positions were NOT GOING TO GET ME ELECTED; HELLLOOOO!!!"
"Isn't my smile PURRRDY???"
Far from going broke, Social Security is probably the only thing thats going to save the middle class.
Lets worry about the "insolvency" of Social Security and Medicare. While were at it lets worry about the deficit. I really can't get anymore fearful waiting for my unemployment to run out. Can we really trust the bean counters after the ENRON/Arthur Anderson fiasco and the Credit Default Swap/ TARP great Recession ?
This woman is just doing what she is told by her campaign people and the the Republicant Party. Otherwise, she is just another woman out there trying to be recognized for what she is. In this case a raving lunatic! She is so heavily coached that she has to the state Republicant representative with her at all times to keep from killing whatever remote chance she has at winning an election. She has demonstrated double standards and no formidable knowledge of any of the things she speaks against or she would not say what she does. She is just another Republicant trying to destroy the US government, because if they cannot have it their way then it will be no way at all. It reminds me of the Bush legacy, crazy beyond everything that was responsible.
<...and that it will not be there in 30 years time>
And there is a cance in 30 years time, Sharron Angle may not be here either.
Sorry - mean "chance", not "cance".
The article is meaningless. Let's get to the real issue at hand which is that HARRY REID is INCOMPETENT and must be FIRED - Preferably Right Now. REID is a total JOKE !!!
gbigs
You're either some lacky for the repub party or you're unemployed and have nothing better to do with your time than "multiple post".
(Yeah - keep repeating "there's not place like home; there's no place like home". Don't forget to click you ruby red slippers, too)
privitize=personalize=pickpocket
Sharron Angle is a SNAKE OIL salesman.
She wants to KILL SOCIAL SECURITY.
NEVER TRUST A GREEDY REP[UBLICAN.
SAVE SOCIAL SECURITY,
VOTE HARRY REID.
Hey Noindex, I too am an american Mexican homegrown, I am also a democrat, always will be, However, most people White, Black Mexican or any other color have a tendency to go CAPITALIST, put 5 thousand dollars in the bank and suddenly They're REPUBLICAN!! What's with that?? It seems to me that Capitalism becomes a state of mind with all you money makers, Harry is right, Hispanics have no reason going GOP.!!!
How stupid does Angle think the seniors of Nevada are? lol
Harry is correct, the average worker and the low
wage worker, OF ANY RACE, should NEVER be a
republican.
We middle class workers are only helped by
Democrats and labor unions, PERIOD.
VOTE HARRY REID.
JustinBReidCampaign: I understand what Sharron Angle is saying, not only that she couldn't do anything with Social security without the rest of Senate. I can understand you wanting to help Senator Reid, but Justin it's over, Republicans, Democrats, the Libs, we all are sick of Senator Flip Flopper, He even Voted to allow illegal Aliens the right to Social Security, "illegal" Aliens" that is madness, Then voted not to build a border fence, then voted for English NOT to be the official language for the U.S Government, and Democrats are calling Sharron Angle nuts, he also voted in favor of federal dollars going to "Sanctuary Cities, if there was a vote for Las Vegas to become a "Sanctuary City", how do you think he'd vote, I personally don't want to wait to see how he would vote, Comes November Senator Reid will be out of a Job, like so many of us who are not working, you know what ILLEGAL ALIENS are working. Thanks to Senator Reid
Hey teamster, Harry's been senate majority leader for 3 1/2 years. His party has had control of the house and the senate and the white house for 18 months. When is the help supposed to get here?
daren.......
Things are getting better.
President Obama, Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi
have done more good than any three in history.
No greedy republican will ever come close.
SAVE SOCIAL SECURITY,
VOTE HARRY REID.
Hey Sharron:
Keep your dirty, grubby Politician hands off my Social Security. Our jobs are being outsourced. Our pensions are being changed to 401k accounts for Wall Street to gamble with and now you want screw up Social Security and Medicare.
"Any word of knowledge yet from God concerning gambling" you will be representing the gambling industry and all the jobs it produces in the state of Nevada.
only in nevada could you come up with an idiot, sorry have to put alaska in that category to. if you vote for sharron and make under 200k a year your a complete imbesile.
Poor Sharron Angle. She just can't figure out what she means when she talks about Social Security -- privatize, personalize, phase-out? Maybe God could talk to her and get this straight.
If she would only keep her mouth shut she would stop putting her foot in there.
YAWN. Vote none of the above. Your state deserves better than reid and angle. Or maybe it doesnt lol. Arent there any other office for election on election day? Reid, Sandoval, Reid, Angle... What about the others? This continuous obnoxious coverage reads like a trashy novel.
Sharron is winning, that's all that matters.