Discussion: 10 comments so far...

1. By LVWranglersHockeyRocks

   1/15/08 at 9:38 p.m.

   Suggest removal

   She may be ready to debate it, but she was WEAK (despite how Chris Matthews is trying to spin it) in tonight's debate.

   I'll tell you what, I was glad to have the Las Vegas Sun website to read while she was rambling tonight. She was hard to listen to.

   Go Obama!
   Go Wranglers!

2. By lepush

   1/15/08 at 10:22 p.m.

   Suggest removal

   Obama won, hands down.

   No contest.

3. By NickD

   1/15/08 at 11:04 p.m.

   Suggest removal

   Hillary Clinton did really well in the debate tonight, I thought. And, I was happy to hear some of the contrasts between her and Obama and Edwards. The fact that Edwards voted agains Yucca Mtn twice makes me realize he's just alot of hot air and what the heck was Obama thinking in voting FOR George Bush's Energy Policy? Why would Obama be so stupid to give the Oil Co's $13 billion in tax subsidies?

   Clearly Clinton was the winner of the debate, but also of the issues.

4. By tomdc

   1/15/08 at 11:57 p.m.

   Suggest removal

   I am a life-long Democrat and was an enthusiastic Clinton supporter before the Iraq war. Now I have nothing but contempt for what the Clintons have become-vile oozing slime.
   I join the great majority of Americans who would vote for a dead dog before I'd vote for another Clinton.

5. By kcee

   1/16/08 at 2:28 a.m.

   Suggest removal

   Hillary's position against the Yucca waste dump is consistently the same and I trust her more than Obama and Edwards on this issue. Same goes for Bill who vetoed the measure.

6. By Theresa

   1/16/08 at 5:08 a.m.

   Suggest removal

   HRC talks out of both sides of her mouth.
   The question that should have been presented to Clinton was. Why do you have the most earmarks than any other Senators? Why do you have the most costly earmarks as well?
   Also Why did she attach an earmark to a bill that would benifit a developer in Sryacuse NY at tax payers expense? And the developer happens to be a donor to your campaign.
   She is very corrupt and manipulating. Hillary no thanks, our country has had enough of the Bushs & Clinton dynasties.
   We need true change. Not a repeat of bad divisive years.. Any one but Clinton.

7. By slbk

   1/16/08 at 5:52 a.m.

   Suggest removal

   Hillary has always opposed by the Yucca Mountain dump site. Obama's campaign is funded by it's owners. You decide.

8. By democratsrus

   1/16/08 at 10:16 a.m.

   Suggest removal

   lol. GOP IS GOING DOWN. No matter what they bring out about Hillary or Barack, you are still going down. So you can pretend that you're happy about Hillary doing well all you want. We will unite against you this november. Sorry Charlies. :D

   And we'll be taking Nevada back this year too. :)

9. By jfritzuy

   1/16/08 at 1 p.m.

   Suggest removal

   lvwranglers.....
   On more than a couple of occassions Obama was stumbling for words not HRC. Put down the paper and pay attention!

   lepush........
   I'm puzzled at how you arrived at that conclusion, did you watch the debate?
   
   Theresa....
   I guess you're ready to vote for Romney or McCain.
   Four more years of Republican Presidency.

   Michael........
   The Republican candidates are mimicking the Democratic platform. I wonder why?

   I have been reading comments from here and other major news outlet blog and websites and this is what most of the people are saying.
   The Obama supporters will not vote for Clinton if she wins and the Clinton supporters will vote Republican if Obama wins. The Republicans couldn't have planned it any better.

« Previous TenNext Ten »