Las Vegas Sun

June 19, 2013

Currently: 89° | Complete forecast | Log in

Reid, Ensign earmarks, Part II

Published Monday, March 16, 2009 | 2:33 p.m.

Updated Monday, March 16, 2009 | 2:34 p.m.

WASHINGTON -- Several of you asked, after reading the weekend story about the earmarks secured by Nevada Sens. Harry Reid and John Ensign secured in the $410 billion omnibus spending bill, for a fuller accounting of what they got for the home state.

As the story mentioned, Reid outlines the more than $100 million he secured for pet projects in Nevada in a press release you can read here.

Ensign earmarked $50 million for special projects in Nevada, mostly those he co-sponsored with Reid or others. Ensign’s list is not readily accessible on his Web site.

But the folks at Taxpayers for Common Sense have compiled a compiled a database of earmarks obtained by all lawmakers.

You can access the Taxpayers for Common Sense report and scroll through to see what Reid and Ensign and the rest of the Nevada delegation put their names on as earmarks in the omnibus.

The file is searchable by bill, by lawmaker or in various combinations. Pour yourself a cup of coffee and check it out.

Discussion: 5 comments so far...

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

Post a comment

Commenting requires registration.

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy.

If you would like to submit your comment as a letter to the editor, you may submit it here.

Most Popular