9 Comments
Facebook
Fark
Digg
Reddit
Stumble
Published Thursday, June 26, 2008 | 8:30 p.m.
Updated Tuesday, Oct. 28, 2008 | 10:15 a.m.
Could this be a not-so-short, not-so-bipartisan special session?
Dueling speeches by Gov. Jim Gibbons and House Speaker Barbara Buckley cast a couple of big questions heading into the special session slated to begin at 9 a.m. Friday.
In the speech tonight, Gibbons promised no new taxes and proposed a spending cap for future budgets.
He also said he would not support cutting money for textbooks — a $45 million piece of the plan negotiated by Senate Majority Leader Bill Raggio and Buckley.
But the real thing that might lengthen the session came during Buckley's speech, in which she took some pretty big shots at the governor. She praised Raggio for his bipartisan cooperation, then said: "I cannot say the same for our governor."
She continued, "This governor has rarely consulted the Legislature, and after categorically stating he would not call a special session, reversed himself 24 hours later."
She also said that in 2009, she would push for reform to the state's tax system.
"It's sad and pathetic to have to even consider these kinds of cuts," she said. "And so here's my pledge to you beyond this special session: I will do everything in my power ... to never do this again."
Ben Kieckhefer, the governor's spokesman, said Buckley's shots wouldn't affect negotiations.
"The governor is focused on public policy matters," he said. "If other people want to turn to political finger pointing, they can do so."
Other observations:
In the governor's office with Gibbons were his highest political advisers, including Sig Rogich, Monte Miller and Robert Uithoven. When Gibbons emerged from the office, he said there were negotiations between his administration and the Legislature and he did not "want to jeopardize them" by revealing details.
He said however that closing the Nevada State Prison in Carson City "is off the table," meaning the prison will remain open. This week, he had emphatically said that closing the prison would be one of his recommendations.
Gibbons also said that his administrators have talked with legislative leaders and have been working together to reach consensus.
As for the textbooks, Buckley said the suggestion came from the school districts. She pointed out there would still be about $45 million for new textbooks, and that the money would be released once certain economic triggers kick in.
She expressed hope the governor would come around to delaying money for textbooks. Kieckhefer said Gibbons "does not want to touch textbook money." Buckley said she decided to take a more aggressive tack about four or five days ago.
"I had enough thinking about what vital service to cut," she said. "I was frustrated by a lack of dialogue."
The LovGov should turn in his resignation on June 30. He is not playing with a full deck.
Buckley's correct in her assessment. Gibbons' failure in communication - whether it be during the Mazzeo mess, his bungled midnight oath of office, or the mixed signals he gave the the Legislature about the special session - is exacerbating his problems unnecessarily. During his speech, he disingenuously claimed all options were on the table, and then, a few sentences later, said he would veto any tax increases "on Nevadans." His inability to see his own contradiction proves the ineptitude of our Governor.
The Legislature will move forward on the agreed cuts. It WILL be bipartisan, but only with a bipartisan consensus between Buckley/Horsford/Raggio/Gansert. Gibbons has kept himself outside of the loop.
We need a Governor with the ability to lead this state, not someone who cowardly screens his calls.
Buckley is a lot of hot air. She and her Democratic friends constantly bitch, moan and complain like little brats. She was totally undignified in her speech and does not deserve to be in leadership.
Buckley is in the union’s right hand pocket.
Instead of delaying a $31 per worker after tax COLA raise for one year, they choose to cut $140 million from the budget. In the real world, that would not happen. It makes absolutely no sense.
She is going to show “leadership” after the election by slamming Nevadans with another round of tax increases.
Speaking of hot air and "bitch" what can we make of this: http://www.nevadaappeal.com/article/2008...
Isn't that a Ban-Lon shirt? Jeez....haven't seen one of those in 40 years.
Tex, Gibbons doesn't seem to have a very good track record with young females in dark parking lots, does he?
Mazzeo claimed assault, this one is crying, according to Gibbons himself in the article. Huh, must be a coincidence.
And Nance, how do you reconcile Raggio and Gibbons allowing COLA to go into effect? In fact, glassy-eyed Gibbons explicitly said during his "address" last night that COLA was not to be touched. More cognitive dissonance, I presume.
I do have to give due credit that the standing up Kama Sutra position is one of the toughest of all to master.
"And Nance, how do you reconcile Raggio and Gibbons allowing COLA to go into effect?"
It is still a dumb thing to do. I think they did not want to fight that battle for the union drones--I mean the Democrats---will never vote for it.
Hey! For once we agree on something, Nance: the Republicans are spineless!
You may not be so bad after all.
Why?