Print
E-mail
Share
delicious
digg
Newsvine
Facebook
Stumble
Technorati
reddit
Fark
twitter
A group against illegal immigration, Americans 4 America, is planning a
rally this afternoon at Hillary Clinton's campaign headquarters in Las
Vegas.
Clinton, who is leading Barack Obama in recent polls of likely Democratic
caucus voters, is being targeted because the organization contends she at
one point said: "No woman is illegal."
Americans 4 America has encouraged supporters to bring illegal immigration
signs and American flags in an effort "to clearly send our message to
Hillary and the world."
The rally on East Tropicana is scheduled to last two hours, starting at 1
p.m.
Hey Hey! Ho Ho!
Obama's Got to Go!
Hey Hey! Ho Ho!
Obama's Got to Go!
Hey Hey! Ho Ho!
Obama's Got to Go!
Hillary All the Way!!!
OBAMA'S RECORD ON YUCCA:
On April 18, 2002, the Illinois State Senate passed SR342 urging the U.S. Congress to support Bush on Yucca:
Illinois State Senate Resolution 342 "urges Congress to sustain President Bush's affirmative decision on Yucca Mountain's suitability as a permanent federal repository for high-level radioactive materials." [S.R. 342, 4/18/02]
Sen. Obama had the opportunity to speak out against the resolution but remained silent. From the State Senate transcript:
"Is there any discussion? Is there any discussion? If not, Senator Rauschenberger moves for the adoption of Senate Resolution 342. Those in favor say Aye. Opposed, Nay. The Ayes have it and the resolution was adopted." [Pg. 26, Illinois senate transcript, 4/18/02]
In contrast, when a similar resolution came before the U.S. Senate in July 2002, Hillary voted against the resolution and issued a press release underscoring her opposition.
Yeah, we know Barack Hussein Obama hates illegals. He is getting desperate.
Sun-Times Exclusive: Obama surfaces in Rekzo's federal corruption case
Source confirmed Obama is the unnamed "political candidate" referred to in document which outlines case against Rezko
January 19, 2008
http://www.suntimes.com/news/politics/ob...
sometimes you get what you deserve girls, bill for 4 more years. hillary gets the nomination, bloomberg runs and the republicans win. just a fact, clinton group started this dirty junk, but can't take it.
What I regret about these recent weeks of dirty politics, is that Barack Obama, through no fault of his own, has been painted, in lurid colors, by the Clinton's(cause let's face it, Bill is running with Hillary this time:)) into a person he is really not. It's obvious that many people didn't know about Obama before this election heated up.
I'm not trying to sway anyone's vote, because we are all going to vote the way according to our own reason. All these heated exchanges and bare naked attempts to appeal to each other's emotions for the benefit of our chosen candidate are not likely to change our minds. But with that said, and no matter if Hillary winds up destroying Barack, or if magically people wind up supporting him in wild numbers again, Barack Obama has honestly led a remarkable political life, and has largely worked toward helping the poor, fighting corporate power, and working to improve health care.
Now, you may be skeptical of that, given all the press coverage and rumors that have been floating around, but it really is true. Read Time Magazines article - http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/...
Time's article is clear and concise, but if you'd rather read just a listing of facts on Obama, read the Wikipedia Encyclopedia entry on him: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obam...
Barack has lived a fairly noble life, as far as politicians go. So I just don't think its fair the way the media, and the Clinton's are trying destroying his image. he's lead a good life, and honestly believes in the idea that our government would better if we'd minimize bipartisanship polarization. He's one of our better politicians, and even if he doesn't win, he's still going to keep fighting for the common good.
Here's a question that Hillary Clinton's supporters cant answer. Why is it that so many high level politicians have given their backing to Obama.
Why is it that John Kerry, Senior Sen. Patrick Leahy, and even Ted Sorenson, President Kennedy's Special Counsel & Adviser, and primary speech writer-- the same guy who wrote "Ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country", all support and have endorsed Obama? Why is it that Al Gore is rumored to soon support Obama as well.
Do you think these seasoned political vets, with numerous years of experience under their belt, and with reputations to protect, would endorse Obama if they did not have good reason? Do you think they would just blindly choose Obama, without seriously scrutinizing his past and his record?
If you do, then you really need to turn off CNN and start reading more.
And why did these same figures not support Hillary. if Hillary is such a great candidate, such a great leader, if she is so about change, if she has so much experience, then why wouldn't they endorse her. Hasn't she been a US senator longer, and worked closely for longer with many of these people?
If you want to know why, then why not watch them explain in their own words. I think your eyes will be opened up -- http://youtube.com/watch?v=ReDCmk2c2g8
Despite what these candidates try to do, truth will always trump lies. I site my sources so that the intelligent among you may follow the sources and judge them for yourselves. My claims?
1. Obama has been fighting for the common man since his earliest years, and has won praise as a skilled negotiator. He really does believes in non-partisanship as a way to operate better government, and a presidency under him would not leave republicans or independents out. --http://www.time.com/time/nation/article/0,8599,1704117,00.html
A listing of his record is at: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barack_Obam... -- everything at wikipedia is well cited, and any claim can be followed to it's source.
2. Hillary Clinton's hilarious assertion that she helped pass the Children's Health Insurance Program was the biggest lie this whole campaign season. Senator Ted Kennedy, democrat in a partnership with Senator Orrin Hatch, conservative republican, wrote the bill and sponsored it together. True bipartisanship. This was in 1997 people, Hillary was not in office at the time, she was a first lady living under the Monica Lewinsky scandal. So how did she help pass any legislation? Lol, talk about taking other people's credit. --http://query.nytimes.com/gst/fullpage.html?res=980CE4D81E39F937A25750C0A961958260
Change we can believe in...Obama!!!
Say no to the dirty tricks of the Clintons...this is a new day!
Obama never said he hate illegals. If the individual was unnamed how can they put a name all of a sudden. Stop lying, maybe you decided to as his name. He is not desperate. Hillary did say that and now people are responding.
It looks like the Chicago sun is revealing a few facts on Barack Hussein Obama as well. My bet, the Clintons did not do it..Looks like he is making his own bed and has been for some time.
Clinton in to! She list Reagan as one of her favorite prez. See:http://www.hillaryclinton.com/news/release/view/?id=4674
"But no president can do it alone. She must break recent tradition, cast cronyism aside and fill her cabinet with the best people, not only the best Democrats, but the best Republicans as well.. We’re confident she will do that. Her list of favorite presidents - Washington, Adams, Jefferson, Lincoln, both Roosevelts, Truman, George H.W. Bush and Reagan - demonstrates how she thinks. As expected, Bill Clinton was also included on the aforementioned list."
How can Obama say he hates illegals when he is considered a minority, just like illegals!
Stop telling falsehoods on Obama! He more than any other candidate know what its like to be looked at and treated diffrent.
Stop with your negativity Hillary! No one wants that in their nominee choice. Try some class Hillary, cause you haven't shown any all this time.
Clinton specifically says (exaggerated rhetoric) whatever is necessary to a group (pandering) for GAIN at the time. With ALL the experience that is professed, WHY? This is NOT the 90's. "Youtube" is amazing.
Most of the candidates are stating all they are going to do for us...I want to know how! The house and senate are responsible. And, whenever they say how the "government" is going to help with healthcare etc, we the people forget that's you and me...if you make over $30,000 a year. Don't vote by feeling - review your candidate's voting record well.
No one is going to control illegal immigration-the CURRENT and the past rules have not been followed.
Hi Dranfu! Are you an employee from Obama campaign?
http://commentisfree.guardian.co.uk/rich...
Ronald Reagan of course died in 2004. And when he did, he was praised "for the way he personified the indomitable optimism of the American people", a statement issued by - you guessed it - Bill and Hillary Clinton. (Not that anyone should hold it against them, it was a eulogy after all.) Krugman decried Reagan's tax policies, but did have this to say: "Still, on both foreign and domestic policy Mr Reagan showed both some pragmatism and some sense of responsibility."
Lol, no, but I can see how you would think that. I'm just truly disgusted by evreything Clinton has done. Suing to supress people's vote, what is that about? Is this 2007 or not? Is she a democrat or not?
She's lied about Barack this whole time. She keeps toting around black celebrites to bring up the ideas of race.
Here's something to think about:
Bush's Strategy for win: FEAR OF WAR
Clinton's Strategy: FEAR OF RACE
Obama's strategy: UNITED WE CAN CHANGE OUR COUNTRY
I respected Clinton before this race started, and she was just as viable in my eyes as Edwards and Obama. Edwards had a good chance of getting my vote, but he just couldn't muster large support.
Obama has led a brillant career, and unlike many people, I've known about him long before this election.
But when Clinton started all these dirty politics, and especially after she sued(in the name of the Teacher's Union) to stop union workers from voting...she lost me completely.
That is tactics of George Bush in Florida. That is not the way of the democrats, and she should take note.
Presidential candidates do not want to address the big problem looming out in the very near future. That is the fact that 20 million plus illegals and their families, if rewarded with amnesty, will immediatedly qualify for welfare, food stamps, housing subsidies, school tuitions and free medical. The majority of the 20 millions coming here illegally are illiterate, unskilled, uneducated and low-wage earners. Who will be paying for these services? Yes, the American taxpayer. This is one reason candidates will not address this problem so as not to scare the people from voting for them. I will stick with Fred Thompson who is against the illegal immigration.
But alas, millions have broken our laws to steal the American dream from honest citizens.
Get your Senator or Congressman to sponsor "The Save Act" , because its the right course for all taxpayers, who carry the burden of pariah employers. When the state of California is on the verge of bankruptcy, because the Governor, state congressman and city officials see nothing wrong with aiding and abetting the pro-illegal immigrant special interest groups? Whereas Georgia and Oklahoma have had enough and its legislators have enacted into law strict statutes to stop the bleeding of their treasuries. Right now the impact has been thousands of illegal aliens fleeing these states. California on the other hand has a massive budget deficit of $14.6 billion, which impact is causing a wide spectrum of cutbacks including education, social services. They are even going to release 22,000 low-risk inmates out of the prison system?
Taxpayers have to supplement thousands of rogue businesses who pay low wages and offer no health-care or any other benefits. Hence taxpayers are forced by Federal and state law to support the California population of foreign nationals with their large families, who need subsidized shelter, health-care and other government handouts they have never paid.
Right now the "Save Act" has a 138 signers, which includes 49 Democrats (which surprises me) and 90 Republicans. Found out more at NUMBERSUSA. It is the best compromise? Not perfect! But it's the best Washington can do?
Tell your do-nothing Senators to do the same and co-author "The Save Act."
The annual cost to taxpayers is about $22 billion a year according to Center for Immigration Studies and the tax burden will grow -- because 15 million more immigrants are set to arrive by year 2017 according to their latest research.
More than 10 million immigrants have arrived since year 2000; it is estimated that nearly 6 million are illegal. All told, the group of immigrants now account for 38 million at the moment according to the White House's own census bureau.