Las Vegas Sun

May 18, 2013

Currently: 67° | Complete forecast | Log in

Angle says Sandoval could have told governor ‘no’ in 2003

Published Tuesday, Aug. 31, 2010 | 1:26 p.m.

Updated Tuesday, Aug. 31, 2010 | 1:29 p.m.

On the campaign trail, Republican Senate candidate Sharron Angle has been trumpeting her decision to appeal a 2003 Nevada Supreme Court decision that cleared the way for the Legislature to pass a tax increase without the constitutionally-mandated two-thirds vote.

In 2003, Angle was one of 15 Assembly members who temporarily blocked a tax hike until one of their members changed his vote.

Angle was so angry at the Nevada Supreme Court, which invalidated the voter-passed constitutional amendment requiring the two-thirds vote, that she recruited a constitutional lawyer to appeal the case in federal court.

Angle says voters punished the Nevada Supreme Court justices who made the initial ruling by voting them out.

So, that raises the question: How much should voters hold Republican gubernatorial candidate Brian Sandoval responsible for his role as attorney general in bringing the lawsuit on behalf of Gov. Kenny Guinn in the first place?

I posed the question to Angle this morning. She laughed nervously for a good 30 seconds before saying she holds the governor more responsible for initiating it.

“(Sandoval) has said he felt that was his job as attorney general to do what the governor had asked him to do because he was the governor’s attorney,” Angle said.

Should Sandoval have just said no?

“I think there was an opportunity probably for him to say no, but I don’t know,” she said. “That’s difficult for me to answer.”

She quickly noted, however, that Attorney General Catherine Cortez Masto recently told Gov. Jim Gibbons no when he asked her to join other states in suing to halt the federal health care legislation.

“I certainly would have liked to see her (join that suit),” Angle said.

Discussion: 27 comments so far...

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy. Additionally, we now display comments from trusted commenters by default. Those wishing to become a trusted commenter need to verify their identity or sign in with Facebook Connect to tie their Facebook account to their Las Vegas Sun account. For more on this change, read our story about how it works and why we did it.

Only trusted comments are displayed on this page. Untrusted comments have expired from this story.

  1. Rhino (Republican Hispanic in Name Only) vs. Cheshire Cat Tea-person.

    Where's the "Chicken Lady?" Where's Republican Unity? Looks like the Republican News Radio Station will have to intervene.

  2. gbigs, You know why Angle won't get elected? Because she has backers like you that helped get her this far. You guys should have picked someone that could beat Harry if you want him out. Instead your group ran a nut case for office. Next time try running someone that does not scare their own party leaders.

Post a comment

Commenting requires registration.

Comments are moderated by Las Vegas Sun editors. Our goal is not to limit the discussion, but rather to elevate it. Comments should be relevant and contain no abusive language. Comments that are off-topic, vulgar, profane or include personal attacks will be removed. Full comments policy.

If you would like to submit your comment as a letter to the editor, you may submit it here.

Most Popular