3 Comments
Facebook
Fark
Digg
Reddit
StumblePublished Tuesday, Aug. 25, 2009 | 8 p.m.
Updated Tuesday, Aug. 25, 2009 | 8 p.m.
It’s as plain as the nose on your face. The racing at Bristol has changed. But has it changed for the better?
Critics of the old Bristol contend that the track produced single-file racing that only allowed cars to pass by using their front bumpers as battering rams. They argue that the racing at Bristol was nothing more than a demolition derby. Sure there were wrecks, but I think the aggressive nature of the racing at this track is what made it unique. Drivers had to use their bumpers to gain track position. And effective use of those bumpers to nudge other cars out of the way was an art form.
Not every race at the old track was a wreckfest. I attended a race at the track before it was reconfigured and there was a mountain of scraping, rubbing and retaliation, but very few cautions.
Drivers seem to like the new, wider and multi-banked track surface that allows for two-wide racing. That’s not surprising. Since the racing isn’t as physical, drivers think it’s easier to pass. Nevertheless, Mark Martin led 240 of the laps last Saturday night.
One thing that is missing from many of the tracks on the Sprint Cup schedule is personality. Bristol was a track with a volcanic personality that made the events at this track some of the most anticipated in the season. Since the track was reconfigured, much of its personality has been diminished. Saturday’s Sharpie 500 was an entertaining race to watch and the final laps were exciting, but the energy level of the race wasn’t on par with the intensity we saw with the old track. In addition, the COT may also be partially responsible for the more subdued racing at the track.
According to a recent issue of NASCAR Scene, the average number of lead changes has dropped from 17 for the four races prior to the track’s reconfiguration to 11.5 in the four races since. And a recent poll conducted by Scenedaily.com asked participants if a perfectly good track has been ruined by the changes. 54 percent said the racing is worse, 33 percent said the racing is better and 13 percent said the racing is no different.
bristol becoming another snoozer track. this cot and tracks on schedule have ruined sport. nascar has no clue how to right the ship and drivers are afraid to speak their minds. jr. pipes up and gets shunned by mike helton.
Bristol will always have personality - the racing is different - not as aggressive....... but there was some good racing last weekend. I grew up in NC and have been to several Bristol Races - and even with the "new" track it will always hold a special place for me.
I wanted to talk about Kantowski and My Mother The Car but I think I clicked on the wrong thing...
sPoRt'S!